Star Trek: Deep Space Nine
"Time's Orphan"
Air date: 5/18/1998
Teleplay by Bradley Thompson & David Weddle
Story by Joe Menosky
Directed by Allan Kroeker
Review by Jamahl Epsicokhan
"I'm disappointed in you, chief. If anyone could break a prisoner out of a holding cell and get them off the station, I'd have thought it would be you."— Odo, before letting the O'Briens continue on their way
Note: This episode was rerated from 3 to 2.5 stars when the season recap was written.
Nutshell: Not great, but nice, with some poignant little touches.
I'm beginning to wonder if the only time O'Brien gets the lead in stories anymore is when the writers want to torture him—as if a story break meeting for an O'Brien episode comes down to people asking each other, "Well, how would O'Brien react to this particular personal tragedy?"
Take this week's example, "Time's Orphan." Poor Miles, after nearly a year of being separated from his family because of the Dominion War, is finally reunited with his wife and two children, takes time out from his busy schedule to have a family picnic on a nearby planet ... only so his daughter can fall through a mysterious time portal and vanish before his eyes. She's transported 300 years back in time, and when Miles pulls her back with a complicated tech procedure, she's 18 years old (played by Michelle Krusiec), having been stranded in isolation for ten years.
So now O'Brien has been switched with a different version of himself in an alternate timeline (where he also saw the station destroyed), has suffered through memories of lengthy incarceration, has wrested through a high-pressure assignment while his wife was taken hostage by an evil entity, has been forced to send a family man not unlike himself to walk straight into his death ... and now faces the prospect of not being able to see his daughter grow up. And that's not all; because she has spent ten years in isolation, she has lost most of her language abilities and finds society completely foreign and ungraspable.
Do the writers give this guy a rough ride, or what?
O'Brien-torturing trends aside, "Time's Orphan" is in the tradition of using elaborate time-travel machinations to tell engaging human dramas. This episode isn't a standout example of this theme, but it's a reasonable story that benefits from some nice little touches.
I don't consider myself a social psychologist, but the premise seems believable enough on its terms. I honestly couldn't tell you if a 24th-century 8-year-old could learn to survive on her own with no resources, or if ten years of isolation would change a person in the ways it changes Molly in this story. For the purposes of the story as given, though, I have no problem accepting these given claims as realistic. It certainly seems sensible in context, so the sense that the O'Briens have their work cut out for them in bringing Molly back to society is a workable premise.
There are numerous scenes where Miles and Keiko try to get through to Molly, who simply doesn't understand. I wasn't exactly riveted by a lot of these scenes, but many of them struck me as genuine. The game with the balls showed patience, and the escape to the holodeck was plausible. And when things began to go wrong, the episode tuned into the O'Briens' desperation rather nicely. The eventual central problem—that Molly is far too difficult to control and must be institutionalized after she attacks a man in Quark's—isn't a big surprise, but is fully empathetic.
"Time's Orphan" also sports the first use of the A/B-story structure since "Change of Heart." The B-story—in which Worf babysits Kirayoshi—fits in with the episode's family-oriented theme with an amiable Dax/Worf yarn that toys with Worf's parenting abilities. Again, this was hardly standout material, but the presentation was amiable enough to make me care, and the story dodged enough cliches to keep it entertaining and rooted in believable characterization. It was good use of Worf and Dax in the lightweight sense, sort of like a lot of "Change of Heart." Dax's impression of Kirayoshi's "Gung! Gung! Gung!" was particularly cute.
But what the crux of the A-story really boils down to are a few interesting decisions made by the characters. First is O'Brien's plan to steal a Runabout and send Molly back through time to her home of ten years. Seeing characters forced with choices they would never want to make always makes me sit up and take notice (though I wonder if Miles would carry out such a plan without Keiko knowing about it, as he initially had planned to). Another good moment is Odo's decision to allow the O'Briens to steal the Runabout after they've been caught by security, which is done in a way that is perfectly in tune with Odo's personality and sly use of dialog.
The ending is a bit of a Catch-22—almost as if the episode wants to have its cake and eat it too. It allows the O'Briens to follow through with their agonizing decision, but then it also allows the episode to end happily and erase all consequences of this decision. It's a bit manipulative because the conveniences of the plot allow the various timelines to resolve themselves almost arbitrarily. Essentially, since the O'Briens manage to get lucky, they get their little Molly back without having to face any of the moral implications of willfully retrieving little Molly in exchange for erasing big Molly—an issue that seemed relevant earlier in the episode. This all feels more like a need to make the story end on a happy note than it seems like a genuine outcome of events. At the same time, having the O'Briens lose their daughter isn't exactly the way I wanted to see this episode unfold, either (just how much tragedy does one man have to endure?). Overall, the twist ending left me a bit skeptical.
On the other hand, this finale, even through the plot convenience, still hinges on two specific choices. The first is the aforementioned choice the O'Briens make in sending big Molly back "home." The second decision, however, is a little more interesting, because it's made by a character with motivations that are much more ambivalent—namely, big Molly herself. Just as O'Brien mused, I wonder if big Molly realized that she was sending little Molly home. I have a feeling she did, but I also wonder if she realized the sacrifice she was making.
Overall, I'm giving "Time's Orphan" a recommendation because it manages to keep its heart in the right place and is acted with sincerity (what more could you expect from Colm Meaney?). The episode also benefits from some nice little touches, like the striking similarity in the drawings of the picnic spot that each Molly renders—a poignant little detail. Still, there are better examples of timeline manipulation stories that put their central characters through emotional wringers (like "The Visitor," "Far Beyond the Stars," or "Things Past," for example). As for O'Brien, I think he has been tortured enough—and I think he has been tortured more effectively, too.
Upcoming: Two reruns ("Resurrection" and "Statistical Probabilities"), followed by the two final episodes of the season.
Previous episode: Profit and Lace
Next episode: The Sound of Her Voice
81 comments on this review
Wed, Jun 25, 2008, 8:55pm (UTC -6)
The second was Worf's reaction to first seeing Dax with Yoshi in their quarters. I don't think Worf's face has ever lit up quite like that before; it may be the warmest Michael Dorn has ever played the character.
BTW, Jammer, I remember when you first wrote this, or rather, the "Next Week" blurb from the previous review. "Deep Space Nell" made me laugh then and it made me laugh now.
Thu, Jun 4, 2009, 5:04pm (UTC -6)
Fri, Aug 28, 2009, 6:39pm (UTC -6)
Thu, Dec 3, 2009, 5:31pm (UTC -6)
Thu, Nov 18, 2010, 7:23pm (UTC -6)
This episode was indeed very poignant, and I think actually writing Molly out would've been a bit much. Though I could've happily lived with her eventually re-integrating into society for the 7th season and all the story around that, but I guess it just would've added to the stuff to be wrapped up.
Reset button plots don't go down too well with me either normally (any episode of Voyager at this point i.e. Season 4, is very frustrating for this) but of all the reset buttons they had to do, I think it worked very well. In my interpretation the older Molly certainly did know what she was doing, and it was a very touching way to finish. It's not like the O'Briens didn't suffer a sacrifice - they lost a real, alternate-future version of their daughter.
Fri, Dec 3, 2010, 4:25am (UTC -6)
But on the plus side, even though she looked 100% ethnically Asian, Michelle Krusiec was seriously hot....
Tue, Jan 11, 2011, 5:46pm (UTC -6)
Tue, Jan 25, 2011, 11:08am (UTC -6)
The main problem is that it comes at a time in the season where time is running out... and of all the stories one could tell about the chief, was this really it?
There was a lot of padding this season, which I think fundamentally made the season worse than season 5. Some of these episodes just don't contribute to the context of the show in any significant way:
6x08 - Resurrection
6x12 - Who Mourns for Morn
6x14 - One Little Ship
6x15 - Honor Among Thieves
6x23 - Profit and Lace
6x24 - Time's Orphan
6x25 - The Sound Of Her Voice
It's not a big list, but notice that they get clumped together. At least some of the filler episodes in season 5 had a good balance - they somehow managed to setup parts of the ongoing story or develop pieces further even if the main story was isolated. These episodes can literally be deleted and it just doesn't matter.
Time's orphan is just one of those episodes I didn't care to say, I didn't want to see and never had to be told.
Sat, Sep 3, 2011, 4:21pm (UTC -6)
Sun, Jan 8, 2012, 4:33pm (UTC -6)
Sun, Feb 12, 2012, 2:40pm (UTC -6)
Sat, Apr 14, 2012, 2:02pm (UTC -6)
If we apply that logic to every other Trek episode that involved time travel, then every character who ever time travelled would not have been entitled to come back.
Sat, Apr 28, 2012, 1:31am (UTC -6)
That said, Rosalind Chao's delivery of the line, "Miles, where's our baby," had me heartbroken and it put a lump of fear in my throat as well. I hope I never have to go through that kind of thing with my kids.
Thu, May 3, 2012, 6:59pm (UTC -6)
Sat, May 12, 2012, 7:40pm (UTC -6)
Tue, May 15, 2012, 7:26am (UTC -6)
Wed, May 23, 2012, 12:54pm (UTC -6)
Thu, May 31, 2012, 5:38pm (UTC -6)
Mon, Jul 2, 2012, 2:33pm (UTC -6)
Fri, Aug 17, 2012, 12:20pm (UTC -6)
Secondly, it is very obvious that older Molly knew she was sending little Molly back to her parents in the end, else she wouldn't have given her the doll to keep.
I must say I rather liked the episode. When you do not care so much for an outwardly perfectly logical plot but can accept that Star Trek stories are very often built up on a fairy tale pattern, "Time's Orphan" is an interesting parable on parenthood. Kira for the first time desires a baby of her own; Odo is frustrated because he can't be the one giving it to her; Worf experiments caring for a small child.
The O'Briens in the meantime experience the most bitter part of parenthood - having to let your child go, which might mean you will never see it again, a very important task every parent must accept and perform, even if the adult life their children lead is totally incomprehensible to them. Molly is eight, usually the age where a parent must begin, if slowly, to let go and to give up the delusion that they will always be the centre of their child's world. Parents who do not manage that make their child pay a huge price later in life. That is also, I think, why they never considered going back into adult Molly's world with her.
Both Miles and Keiko prove considerable maturity and courage sending adult Molly back, so the "happy ending", as it is in fairy tales, is somehow the reward for having learned the lesson. That Miles at first was about to send Molly back without consulting Keiko first is not surprising, seeing how only shortly before she was whining "Where is our baby?" It's only a good thing that she later understands that Molly is no longer a baby and no longer her child but her own person, whatever or whoever that person may be, and who can manage to live in her own world, which is bewildering and lonely to their parents.
Seen like this, I wish a lot of parents would watch "Time's Orphan" and understand this kind of subtext. Obviously, you won't if you insist that Star Trek stories must be perfectly documentable, as if such stories could ever really take place exactly like this, in some remote future...
Thu, Nov 8, 2012, 11:39pm (UTC -6)
Sat, Feb 2, 2013, 4:26pm (UTC -6)
I think the main reason someone would not like this episode is that it does nothing to further the "soap opera" arc elements of the series as a whole. That has never been too important to me, so it's not a concern; if anything, I am happy for a story in which I don't have to have seen the previous 5 episodes to get it.
The other reason not to like it is because nothing blows up and few people are stabbed.
I liked it just fine. It's a great character study and a great Trek story. Not the best episode by far, but a very good one.
Wed, Feb 13, 2013, 7:10am (UTC -6)
Tue, Feb 26, 2013, 1:44pm (UTC -6)
Wed, Mar 13, 2013, 11:03pm (UTC -6)
But the most contrived plot element is that she freaks out - and there is no second chance. She is going to be sent to some home far away, taken from parents, etc. The injured person would be fine in a week. They said he'd press charges. That's believable. But then without a trial, without time passing, without a second chance, Molly is going to be shipped off immediately, far away, to some prison home place. It can't be stopped, appealed, postponed, or challenged. Marshall law Starfleet, huh? I don't think the Dominion war has made them that bad. Totally contrived, but that was to get them back to the planet. These two places where the plot was forced to move forward (can't try again and going to rehab home, no appeal) were very clumsy and kind of ruined it for me. Pull out the Worf/Dax subplot and handle this a little more gracefully!
Still not as bad as profit and lace, where I watched the clock more than the screen.
Mon, May 27, 2013, 1:14am (UTC -6)
Doesn't the portal deserve some study - or preservation at least?
And if your kid is 8, has lived all her life in the comfort of her parents and then 10 years passes in solitude, while traumatic definitely yes, you don't forget all the talking and the faces of your parents. If it would have been Yoshi who goes through the portal and returns at 18, it would have made sense.
Interesting idea, but very badly written. Among the worst of episodes.
Tue, Jun 25, 2013, 11:38am (UTC -6)
I kept seeing the unusual flaws.
How hard would it be to find an Asian girl who doesn't have an extra 10 lbs of chub on her arms? She definitely hadn't missed any meals recently. Nor trips to the manicurist. Her perfectly cut, but badly hair-sprayed bangs, her complex weave-pattern upper garments with her spandex-like leggings... Do you know how difficult it is to make nylon... with stone age tools??
This is an 8 year old girl who forgot how to speak. How skilled is she going to be at surviving?
I think it is interesting because I have learned a couple of languages that have lain dormant since I was a child for 15-20 years and it took me all of 10 minutes to get back into the groove of things... And those were secondary languages, never spoken at home. And after running into an old acquaintance after 15 years of not seeing each other, my subconscious recognized him before I could even place the name (slightly embarrassing because he has the same name as me...).
And the portal... I guess with all his technological skill, O'Brien couldn't figure out how to make a simple locking door.
Come on. I expect more! DS9 is my favorite of the Treks, but this sort of fluff belongs in Voyager!
Tue, Oct 15, 2013, 9:17pm (UTC -6)
It would have been extremely difficult for Molly to survive 10 years on her own, when she's used to being fed and cared for. She'd have no idea what to eat or how to get it. It's really wildly unlikely she would last 2 months, let alone 10 years.
And total parenting fail! If 19-year-old Molly needs to be at a care center where she'll be watched full time, if she needs to be on a planet where she can run and play in nature, then that's what you do as parents. If you have to resign for Star Fleet and move to earth, that's what you do. Even 21st century United States parents would probably do that, and this is supposed to be the so-enlightened Federation! Sending a child back to live a short live as a wild beast is beyond cruel.
And there's the reset-button ending. Very few reset-button episodes are worth watching... and this isn't one of them.
Sat, Nov 2, 2013, 6:24pm (UTC -6)
Wow, another horrible episode. Season 6 taking a major nosedive.
1/10
Tue, Nov 19, 2013, 12:55pm (UTC -6)
And Molly wasn't acting out by writing crappy poetry and getting bad grades in school. She hospitalized a dude with a broken bottle. Even with Federation medical technology, people still die from stab wounds. Transferring her to the care of trained professionals actually seems pretty reasonable to me, rather than a monstrous injustice the episode seems to imply it is. And like kkt said, the O'Briens could have made efforts to join her at the care facility.
The episode was also a terrible metaphor for letting your child go. It's not like Molly choose to go natural and live in the wild; she was wrested from her parents by a time machine and she reverted to her animal nature due to isolation.
Add up all the complaints made by previous posters and this was a pretty crappy episode.
Mon, Jan 6, 2014, 3:55pm (UTC -6)
Star Trek does tend to idealize a "state of nature", you see this when subsistence farmers are shown as having an overflowing bounty of food and leisure time. In reality, subsistence farming is hard work with some very lean times. Molly would have been unlikely to survive, unless the climate was ideal for the entire year and there was plenty of edible fruit to eat, but that's unlikely. What she would have gone back to was a very rough life, struggling to survive, a life which would end in starvation when she got too injured or sick to find food.
The legal stuff didn't make a lot of sense. The victim of the attack may want to press charges, but that doesn't determine an outcome, and the outcome certainly would have taken time. Molly would certainly been ruled not criminally culpable, and though she might be put into an institution, she's not insane, so it wouldn't be permanent. They do act like she's going to a 19th century asylum, but this is the 24th century. I am sure there are plenty of institutions that could give her open spaces and take care of her until she was ready to rejoin society. Perhaps a Bajoran monastery, I imagine the Emissary could arrange that. I'm really not sure just what message this story is sending. "Better to be totally alone than to be in any institution" seems to be the closest. But even today there are institutions that could give her time outside. Not everyone that goes into an institution stays there for life. Do they have no medical options to calm her down short of rendering her unconscious?
Sat, Feb 15, 2014, 12:03pm (UTC -6)
Fri, Apr 25, 2014, 6:21am (UTC -6)
Fri, Apr 25, 2014, 3:04pm (UTC -6)
I think THAT might be pushing it. The crux of the the B story, to me, was Worf coming to terms with the fact that he was a horrible dad. And that's why he was so sure Jadzia was judging his fitness to be a father.
For a man who so often is held up as a paragon of honor, he was a really crappy dad. And it's just really nice to see them address that in the context of a marriage and 2 people talking about having kids together.
I won't defend the A story, but I think the level of bad that the A story is colored your assessment of the B story :P
Thu, May 8, 2014, 8:42pm (UTC -6)
The B-story is naturally prescient to the A rather than being its own separate identity. It is lightweight to be sure but hardly inconsequential and all the while shows a fairly unique (and welcome) side of Worfs personality. His apologizing for his failures as a father were a bit heavy-handed but, understandable considering we know that his past in that regard was dubious at best.
While the episode was definitely watchable with some really great character moments, some of the logistics outright failed. Surely a 24th century Federation social and behavioral rehabilitation center would be 100% better than sending Molly back "home". That's just one example of why, despite many good things, this ultimately can not be salvaged as a whole, yet there's some scraps worth picking at.
2 stars.
Wed, Aug 20, 2014, 1:43pm (UTC -6)
Wed, Aug 20, 2014, 1:49pm (UTC -6)
Trek's time-travelling rules are very inconsistent; it seems that the portal transports one back to the same point in time every time one goes through. Although, if "Parallels" (I hate that show) is to believed, Big Molly should still have to live her life as an illiterate alone in the wilderness in another quantum reality.
Wed, Aug 20, 2014, 4:43pm (UTC -6)
The net time travel is that of 18-year-old Molly ten years into her past. In this respect it didn't matter whether the time the portal sent Molly to in the first place was in the future or in the past, as long as no interaction with the present was possible. The obvious paradox in this story can be solved, if we postulate that the time portal has an isolating effect, allowing that different timelines exist on its two sides.
(Ex Astris Scienta)
Sounds good to me :-)
This episode isn't the greatest, but I didn't think it was all that bad either.
I actually don't see any reason Molly couldn't survive. Those instincts are pretty strong and there weren't any predators, right? (uninhabited planet) We've accepted worse in trek for sure.
There were some touching moments, what I have to assume is the only purpose of this episode.
I'm so glad they got Molly back, that loss would have been a hard one to swallow. Just the thought of losing your child makes me quiver. I almost lost it when 8-Molly went back through the portal.
Average episode. 2.5 stars.
Sat, Oct 4, 2014, 2:10am (UTC -6)
1) What food is safe to eat? How do you preserve it?
2) What water is safe to drink? How do you deal with dysentery?
3) How do you make a fire?
4) How do you deal with illness?
5) How do you administer first aid when injured?
An 8 year old, alone, even one who's been in the field a lot with Keiko? I give her a month.
And there's no option other than an "institution"?
This is supposedly the post-money, replicator-economy. Molly needs a holosuite? Why can't Miles and Keiko have one in their apartment?
Surely Miles can replicate some holoprojectors.
And even a 21st century institution would be preferable to a life as a solitary hunter gatherer, where life would be "nasty, brutish, and short." No health care, no safety net, no retirement.
Honestly, how could any parent who thought about it for 30 seconds condemn their child to *that*? Particularly, a child who -- at this point -- really can't give "informed consent" -- Molly can't possibly realize that she's going "home" for *the*rest*of*her*natural*life.
B-plot. OK. Here's Worf beating himself up again. I didn't see that he did *anything* wrong as a father, but we get to listen to himself whine about how bad he did......
One of Trek's worst.
Mon, Oct 6, 2014, 8:30am (UTC -6)
Mon, Oct 6, 2014, 11:29am (UTC -6)
Tue, Oct 14, 2014, 2:56am (UTC -6)
Arrghh.... I meant "Worf did fine baby-sitting Kirayoshi". No, obviously Worf messed up with Alexander...... sorry I wasn't clear on that!
Tue, Oct 14, 2014, 12:55pm (UTC -6)
This is probably the weakest O'Brien story yet, just inching out S2's "Tribunal". This one includes a lot of wasted rehab scenes, such as Molly playing with a ball or Molly eating a melon.
And then in typical (bad) Trek fashion, everything gets resolved at the end with no harm, no foul done to anyone? The institution may not be ideal, so the better idea is... sending Molly back to become a cave woman? If they NEEDED to do a Molly-in-danger episode, why not just use the Dominion in some way...? I'm willing to bet this was a pre-written script or something. It's all just pointless, like the worst of late-TNG.
1-1/2 stars, I guess. Most of it isn't necessarily unwatchable, but it's absolutely skippable and adds nothing to anything.
Here's the weird thing about S6 - it maybe has the best crop of strong episodes out of the entire series, but it also probably has as many mediocre and sub-par entries as S1. Even most of the weaker entries of S4 and 5 seemed to have at least a few things going for them. It's more painful in S6 though, since there's so much other stories I'd rather be seeing.
Wed, Oct 15, 2014, 8:30pm (UTC -6)
At least a whacky episode like Spocks brain, or the classic All Our Yesterday's were ENTERTAINING - including witty banter given the extreme ridiculousness of the situation. I shall shake my head in disbelief and go watch a few Voyager episodes for contemplation...
Sun, Mar 8, 2015, 9:10pm (UTC -6)
My comment is, this is only the second time I have liked Keiko. "In the Hands of the Prophets" and "Times Orphan." Rosalind came off as a real parent in both of these. The first where she realized that children needed structure and should not be allowed to roam free on the station. Of course, "Time's Orphan" brought me to tears, her acting was genuine and she wasn't fighting Miles; they were fighting together.
I have seen better, but this was a good episode.
Fri, Mar 13, 2015, 12:19pm (UTC -6)
Actually, that would have been a hell of a way to write Keiko and Molly out of the show altogether. Maybe would have bumped this up to 3 or 4 star territory. Hmmm.
Thu, Mar 26, 2015, 10:13pm (UTC -6)
Good point!
Fri, Jul 24, 2015, 4:22am (UTC -6)
This season has taken a nosedive since "In the Pale Moonlight". Enough fluff, can we get back to the main story arc, PLEASE!
Thu, Aug 6, 2015, 6:45am (UTC -6)
Tue, Sep 29, 2015, 3:29am (UTC -6)
"We can't take those 10 years away from her!". Dude, she was just sent 300 years in the past, yeah? So basically she was dead of old age. Then you went and got her back age 18, how many years did you already "take back from her"? And because of this stupid reasoning full of holes, you'll allow your little girl to grow up in complete isolation, something that is bascially akin to torture? Seriously... WHY?
With that ridiculous premise out of the way, the O'Briens try to help their daughter and realise she will never fit into this life of theirs. So they... send her back? She'll be happy there, yaddi yadda? Well, for a while, maybe. What happens when she breaks a leg? Or falls sick? Not to mention that no matter how much space the girl needs, human beings remain social beings. THEY GO MAD with no one to talk to. You don't do that to your child, you just don't!
And the concept that Molly would be institutionized for life when her parents are there to take care of her is ridiculous. Even now in measly 20th century we don't do that anymore. Temporarily, yes, but always with the clear objective to enable the patient to go back to a more functioning life outside.
All around, this plot was holding together with bits of duct tape. I don't think it deserves more than 1 star... for the B-plot.
Tue, Oct 13, 2015, 4:12am (UTC -6)
Muahahaha. What a load of bullshit. "This Molly" has lived alone for ten years in a cave. Literally! You have to say "literally" because it's grotesque.
Let's not deprive her of that experience! Don't erase that part and replace it with ten years of happy childhood.
Isn't this the dream of a lot of people? To do things over again. Don't most of think sometimes: "Ah, if I could go back to this moment 10 years ago and do things differently."
And that is people who just think they didn't study hard enough in college or shouldn't have broken up with their s/o.
This girl had 10 years of solitary confinement - that *really* is something you'd want to forget.
Imagine Bashir using this logic in the episode where O'Brien gets the fake memories of being imprisoned for 20 years. "Well Miles, we *could* erase those memories, but we'd be killing of this new you." -- "F*** You, Bashir."
Fri, Oct 16, 2015, 5:36pm (UTC -6)
Tue, Dec 1, 2015, 5:23pm (UTC -6)
The actress who played the older Molly was very good, though. It was mainly her performance that kept my attention. I still couldn't bring myself to like Keiko, but I was...neutral. She was a mother concerned about her child and played that part fairly well, without pushing O'Brien away. That was an improvement.
Tue, Dec 15, 2015, 8:54pm (UTC -6)
Thu, Jan 14, 2016, 7:54pm (UTC -6)
Tue, Jan 26, 2016, 12:05am (UTC -6)
Fri, Jan 29, 2016, 7:32am (UTC -6)
Sat, Feb 6, 2016, 3:37pm (UTC -6)
Perhaps because it's a "bad things happen to Chief O'Brien" that has a happy ending? Because it's a DS9 episode that has some sensitivity, a bit of heart, and is genuinely moving? Because of a great little performance as older Molly? Because it has an amiable B-story? Perhaps all of the above and more.
"He acquitted himself well" indeed. 3 stars.
Fri, Feb 19, 2016, 10:29pm (UTC -6)
Tue, Feb 23, 2016, 11:12pm (UTC -6)
The O'Briens material, not so much; we have to believe that they would actually agree with Julian's dubious temporal mechanics moralizing and we have to believe that they believe that their only option really is to send Molly back to that planet to go live and die alone. The argument Bashir offers is totally unconvincing -- they already "killed" a future Molly by bringing her into the future at all, and so if he was going to object to this he should have done so before. (And at the very least, even if they believed Bashir's argument, they should have recognized that once they succeed in communicating with Molly, they should be able to ask for her consent of whether or not to bring back Earlier Molly.) It is even less believable that the O'Briens would believe it. The second decision is also damaging. The idea here really seems to be that it is simply impossible to find an open space for Molly now, to the point where the only place they can take her is into the past. To justify this, they explain that even if Molly can get holosuite time in a Federation care centre, she wouldn't survive the transport over! Which, you know: 1) remember holodecks? and 2) if that's the case, maybe the O'Briens should have been more concerned about bringing her over to her planet on a Runabout! I gather that the planet is much closer than the Federation care centre, but if Molly can be brought on a transport that distance while unconscious, it seems like it shouldn't be so impossible to figure out some way to transport her carefully to the care centre.
So really, the O'Briens' final decision is only as believable as it is that they would basically agree with Molly's view of the planet as her home. And...well, I do think some of this is the idealization of The Wilderness and escape from society that crops up sometimes in these stories, and certainly Miles and Keiko are trying their best to respect Molly's wishes. The problem for me is that the stakes just don't seem believably high enough to justify this choice -- we have to believe that the station/Federation law is so harsh, that the Federation institution is so bad, that surviving on a transport is so impossible, that everyone would go looking for her, that the decision must be made RIGHT NOW where she belongs. It would be one thing if Molly could genuinely, outside of traumatized outbursts and with something other than her marginal vocabulary, her preference for the wild, but she cannot really, and bringing her back to that planet *and sending her back in time* as well is forever.
All that said, I like parts of this episode. It helps that I believed Miles and Keiko's genuine desire to connect to their daughter, and that while I think that the episode fails to make the case for it, I still on some level feel the weight of the sacrifice that they make at the episode's end, when they do what they believe is best for their daughter even if it means never seeing her again. The idea of Miles and Keiko struggling with a daughter who has undergone a major traumatic transformation maps onto a lot of parental struggles (that Molly had a rather extreme growth spurt means that there's a bit of a puberty analogue here, but mostly it seems like this represents an attempt to connect to Molly in the wake of a major event), and it is somehow appropriate given that we saw the outcome of Miles connecting to his family after *his* major traumatic event in "Hard Time." I get why some find it slow, but I found the scenes with the ball and whatnot suitably engaging (with a great punchline as Molly's stack of balls was revealed). I thought that Michelle Krusiec gave a good performance in the "Nell" Molly role and Meaney and Chao were typically strong. Somewhat to my surprise, I found myself getting very involved in the tragedy of Molly's experience, even though it feels a little pointless in the wake of the recognition that it ends.
I do tend to think that Adult Molly recognized her younger self, and there is something nicely bittersweet about her sacrificing herself so that her younger self can have the life she didn't have...and yet it also somehow negates Adult Molly's existence, and indeed negates the idea that she should "go back home" to the planet, since ultimately Adult Molly makes the choice to eliminate the years of her life on the planet to send Young Molly back to reintegrate into her parents' life. Something about it makes me feel a little unsettled, actually, which maybe goes to show that there is something to Bashir's moral dilemma after all; the Wild Molly who cannot fit into society has to be destroyed so that the Social Molly can return to it. It's actually something of an open question then: how much *did* Adult Molly have a life that was worthwhile, and worth preserving, on that planet, alone? And is it possible that Wild Molly sent Young Molly back through the portal not just to save herself but because she knew that was the Molly her parents wanted more?
The Worf-Kirayoshi plot is generally amusing, though Worf is too down on himself in a way that spoils the fun. What is interesting is that Worf actually is something of a Wild Man, and the question of how much to introduce Kirayoshi to the joys of wildness (through the gung-gung-gung game and through play which risks getting Yoshi injured) turns out to reflect the main plot -- where Wild Molly cannot fit in on the station and has to go back to the wilderness, where she sends forth the "tame" Molly. Worf's concern really has a lot to do with whether or not he can be trusted with a child, or whether his Klingonness really does mean he is on some level too dangerous for child-rearing, whether he'll play rough. That Yoshi comes away happy from his "gung gung gung" experience with Worf suggests that there is some role for "wildness" in life and in childhood -- which makes me wonder if the episode should somehow have had Molly changed by this episode, even a little -- if Adult Molly could have given Young Molly something of her wildness experience rather than just the doll (which was Molly's to begin with). The subplot does show some progress in Worf/Dax, even if its primarily on Worf's side.
I guess 2 stars from me.
Sat, Jul 16, 2016, 3:41pm (UTC -6)
I empathized with the O'Briens in this episode, and I understood the scenes in the holodeck trying to teach the new Molly to speak again. However, I was never really gripped by the episode; I think the director and editor was struggling to keep the episode involving. I'd give this one 2 stars, maybe 2.5.
Mon, Jul 18, 2016, 7:40pm (UTC -6)
So I was down with them allowing her to wake up in the cargo area. But the mommy in me knows it's going to take more than tossing balls around and watching her sleep in a tree, to help Molly! Get some professional help for goodness sake!
Then when she has a mental freak out and stab what's his face.. The mommy in me would wonder "well where the heck did baby girl learn how to do that! What heck went on down on that planet! I would be screaming" GET MY BABY SOME HELP! THIS IS BIGGER THAN US PLAYING CATCH WITH SOME BALLS AND HOPING WE GET MOLLY BACK!
Then they decide to send her back with a freakin doll and blanket! I was was ticked at that point. The mommy in me would have done one or two - turned around and smacked Miles for coming up with that stupid idea or if that was the only solution to send my baby back to the wild life... We both would have gone! Of course I would take more than a blanket! We would need some phasers and a replicator or two! :p
Needless to say the mommy in me hated this episode!
Fri, Aug 12, 2016, 5:39pm (UTC -6)
Next they finally manage to bring back their daughter after she has spent 18 years of isolation on the strange planet. All they had to do was send back this poor tortured soul and calibrate the machine to rescue the younger child. But let's not do that because the scared, tortured mentally unstable 18 year old would cease to exist and they'd have spared their child from years of trauma.
Even after they find that their traumatized teen is unfit for society do they think "Let's send her back and rescue her as little Molly? No they're solution is to send her back into isolation and wash their hands of her.
I wanted to beat them.
Mon, Aug 29, 2016, 12:12am (UTC -6)
You know, the thing I am thinking now, which I didn't consider back during it's first run (I was in my 20s, now in my 40s) is the right thing would have been for O Brien to resign, get a farm in Ireland, and take Molly there. In 3 - 5 years she would have been an educated productive member of society and he could have come back to Starfleet.
of course, he needs to be on the show. So, if they must have sent Molly back to the time portal to sell the "letting go of your child" message, then there should have been no return of the 8 year old. They should have had to live with the emotional reprocussions of letting the child go and never seeing her again (which was the point of their decision). Hey, they could have done an O'Brien arc where he was obsessed with finding her and maybe ends up finding the planet and her bones and some artifacts from here life there centuries ago (maybe some art, tools, a shelter, things like that).
So to me, the issue here is there was no consequence to their decision. Reset buttons suck in Trek and this episode would have been more powerful without it and given some compelling B story plots in a later episdoe or two.
Mon, Sep 26, 2016, 4:53pm (UTC -6)
It is revealed at the end that the portal is two-way. Stuff can pass back and forth through it easily. Meaning, Miles or Keiko, or anyone else, *could've* just walked through and returned with Molly, at *any time.*
Now, you can say they didn't *know* that... but could they really not think of any way to *test* it? Program a flying drone to fly through, then fly back? Nope. It was just... "Molly went through this portal-thing. Obviously, it is one-way."
If I push that (glaring, imo) issue aside, I liked the episode well enough - I'd agree with 2.5 stars, though I quite liked the Worf sub-plot. Someone complained about Worf being so hard on himself, but to me, Worf was projecting his fears based on the *fact* that he *royally screwed up* with Alexander as a child, a fact that has been forced brought back into focus for him by the recent return of Alexander. He whines and postures to Dax as if he's proving it to her, but really he's wanting to prove it to himself. And in the end, he does, and it's a good little sub-plot for him. I like this B-plot enough to bump the ep's overall rating up to a 3 out of 4, personally.
Fri, Feb 10, 2017, 9:02pm (UTC -6)
Fri, Feb 10, 2017, 9:20pm (UTC -6)
Meanwhile in the White House...
TRUMP: I just read that a classic episode of Star Trek was banned by the previous administration. Ridiculous! We'll bring it back in 3D!
Mon, Mar 27, 2017, 10:41am (UTC -6)
The B plot was cute. I thought Michael Dorn's acting was excellent in it.
Those are the only good things I can say about this episode.
Sun, May 21, 2017, 9:19am (UTC -6)
Also, recall that O'Brien and many on the crew had zero issues with **thousands** of people not getting a chance to exist in Children of Time. That is, until O'Brien saw a curly-haired redhead like himself and changed his mind.
The "all women get baby fever when they see a baby" thing was offensive.
Worf was surprisingly likable here. Keiko for once didn't grate on my nerves. Molly was her annoying self as a child, and now we know, as an adult too. Leave them both in the past, and send in Yoshi and Keiko too.
Wed, May 24, 2017, 9:39pm (UTC -6)
Kira isn't having baby fever just because she saw a baby. She carried Yoshi for five months and gave birth to him, that's a deep emotional connection, not insulting by any stretch of the imagination.
I thought this was a decent episode until the ridiculous ending. Yea let's condemn Molly to eternal solitude because she hadn't adjusted to life in the station in the two whole days since they got her back.
Mon, May 29, 2017, 5:33pm (UTC -6)
Made me chuckle as a Brit :D
Many flaws, especially on the paradox front. Frustrating reset button ending. However on rewatching I see it more as an episode about parenthood and the challenges involved. Not perfectly done, but a mix of serious and light hearted. Doesn't progress anything though.
(for non-Brits, bollocks is both a swear word and used to describe something as rubbish).
Fri, Jul 14, 2017, 4:35pm (UTC -6)
Fri, Aug 18, 2017, 11:44pm (UTC -6)
THis was boring filler. ds9 should NOT be doing TNG stories and even TNG couldn't make this story work.
Mon, Oct 9, 2017, 8:28pm (UTC -6)
Thu, Nov 16, 2017, 7:27pm (UTC -6)
Some touching and well-acted moments -- the O'Briens concern for what would happen to big Molly was well portrayed, their genuine attempts to relate to big Molly were too. Sending her back through the portal turns out to be a logical (and convenient) solution although it required some justifiable dirty work. Good scene for Odo to let the O'Briens get away with it.
But there's a lot not to like about this episode as well. Little Molly just happens to find a poor man's version of the Guardian of Forever time portal on a nearby planet. You'd think the existence of such a phenomenon would be known by the DS9 crew. The ending resolution with big Molly sending little Molly back through and everything being cool -- seems like a stretch given how little intelligent thinking big Molly showed. Did the O'Briens even expect to get little Molly back? I think they were just prepared to continue their lives without her.
But I think this episode might resonate with parents who have had to deal with difficult children, foster care etc. So why not make DS9's average dude Miles O'Brien have to deal with that?
2 stars for "Time's Orphan" -- definitely another filler episode -- a contrivance to put Miles O'Brien (and this time with his wife) through the emotional roller-coaster. But it did make me care about what would happen to big Molly after her rampage through Quark's and the prospect of foster care. However, the whole thing is contrived pretty heavily. DS9 has had better time travel contrivance episodes.
Coming to think of it, DS9 Season 6 has been pretty poor since "In the Pale Moonlight" (5 episodes averaging 1.5 stars by my ratings).
Sun, Jan 7, 2018, 6:38pm (UTC -6)
Hated HATED HATED the second half. Having Molly sent back all alone was so out of character, especially for Keiko. She's a b* most of the time, but she deeply cares about her family. I was so shocked that neither she nor Miles even thought about going with Molly to the special care center to help her reintegrate into society.
I was even more shocked that they were both sending her back in time, without coming with her. Every parent I can imagine would follow her daughter into the past. I was literally shouting at the screen when put their plan into action.
Granted, Miles has a duty because of the war, but I would have expected to have at least go Keiko with her. They could still have retrieved young Molly, because even having young Molly interact with her mother again would have probably erased wild Molly. Alternatively, the writers could have used this chance to finally get rid of Keiko :p
Wed, Mar 28, 2018, 12:32pm (UTC -6)
An 8-year-old can wander into a cave and, boom, there's an ancient time travel machine just sitting there? And the machine decides to turn on suddenly?
And then the DS9 crew can figure out perfectly in a few minutes/hours how said totally alien piece of tech works.
Mon, Apr 2, 2018, 12:11am (UTC -6)
Wed, Apr 11, 2018, 4:51pm (UTC -6)
Mon, Aug 27, 2018, 5:17pm (UTC -6)
Tue, Oct 23, 2018, 7:18pm (UTC -6)
Submit a comment
◄ Season Index