Star Trek: The Next Generation

"The Child"

2 stars

Air date: 11/21/1988
Written by Jaron Summers & Jon Povill and Maurice Hurley
Directed by Robert Bowman

Review by Jamahl Epsicokhan

As the Enterprise embarks on yet another humanitarian mission to stop yet another deadly plague, a strange and unexpected thing happens in mid-journey: Counselor Troi announces she's pregnant. "Who's the father?" Riker asks accusingly. "There is none," Troi responds.

The height of this episode's wit comes with a funny-in-its-savageness remark by Worf, whose utterly pragmatic Klingon-security-officer response to this mysterious, alien-influenced immaculate conception is simply that it must be terminated at once in order to wall off all possible risk. (Just think of how this could've been the ultimate launching-off point for an abortion-debate episode. Never mind.) The story's sci-fi gimmick is that the pregnancy proceeds at a vastly accelerated rate, such that Troi is giving birth to a son named Ian by the second act. The baby's accelerated growth proceeds from there, and Ian is an eight-year-old boy within 24 hours.

The problem with this story is that it has far too little curiosity in Ian or Troi (for most of the episode, their mother/son scenes meander with precious little original insight or interest), and far too much curiosity in the technobabble subplot, involving a deadly substance sealed in a container for transport to another facility. Some mysterious radiation is causing the seal to crack; if the substance gets out, everyone on the ship will die. The tedious tech details of the radiation, the leak, and the resulting threat drag on needlessly long, causing all interest to drain from the story.

And what about Ian? The story doesn't deal with him nearly enough, until the closing scenes where we learn he's the source of the mysterious radiation, and that he was born to Troi to learn about the human life cycle. Ian's self-sacrifice (or a reversion to his true energy state, if that's the same thing) makes for a good emotional scene that Marina Sirtis delivers on, but the sci-fi themes are familiar.

The episode's serviceable supporting material surrounds Wesley's question of whether to join his recently reassigned mother at Starfleet Medical, the introduction of the abrasive new McCoy-wannabe Dr. Katherine Pulaski (Diana Muldaur), and Guinan (Whoopi Goldberg) as the bartender of Ten-Forward, the Enterprise's new (or at least previously unseen) refreshment lounge.

Previous episode: The Neutral Zone
Next episode: Where Silence Has Lease

◄ Season Index

93 comments on this review

Mon, Oct 15, 2007, 11:11pm (UTC -6)
I wish I could make a comment on Dr. Pulaski, but I can't remember even the slightest detail about her.
Grumpy Otter
Tue, Oct 23, 2007, 2:29pm (UTC -6)
I must make one very positive comment about Season Two, and that is that we were free of Dr. Crusher. Pulaski was so much more of a tough, actual real-seeming doctor than Crusher's simpering "sweetness." The pseudo sexual tension between Crusher and Picard was enough to make me ill.

From the moment Pulaski walked on the scene and took charge in "The Child," I was rooting for her to be a permanent replacement. But alas.

How I long for the days when the doctor was offspring-free!
Fri, Apr 22, 2011, 9:03am (UTC -6)
Hello from Italy.
This is the first time I comment on this great site and I'd like to begin with a particular aspect of TNG season 2 on which I ask for your opinions.

The topic is DR. PULASKI, magnificently played by Diana Muldaur.

I just finished to watch again TNG season 2 and I think that Pulaski has been a fresh breeze in the slow beginning of TNG (first and second seasons).
I have read so many bad reviews about her but why?

If you compared her character with another strong character like Data, for ex., I could even understand. But if we compare her with Dr. Crusher, there is no match.
Dr. Crusher is one of the most boring and absolutely not pushed characters of all Star Trek season; you see or you don't see her, is not important.
Dr. Pulaski instead has a strong personality; someone compared her to Dr. McCoy but I'd rather say that she is just strong, determined, very human, even nice in some comic moments with Data and Picard (not speaking about the klingon ceremony that she shares with Worf).
Many fans think that she is unpolite just because, at the beginning, she innocently underestimate the real complexity of Data (but later in the season, she seems to appreciate him very much).
Basically, in just 1 season, Dr. Pulaski has a greater evolution than Dr. Crusher in 6 seasons!

So, at last, I'd like to know what you have against this poor and underestimated character.
It could have been great to have her for the whole series.
Fri, Apr 22, 2011, 10:44pm (UTC -6)
I agree with Franco's assessment of Dr. Pulaski.

Having been raised on classic Star Trek (we don't need no steenkin' "OS"!), I was often annoyed by the character of Dr. Crusher. Dr. Pulaski was a refreshing change, in spite of some rough scripts in early season 2, and in spite of (or maybe because of) the obvious homage to Dr. McCoy.

I think Dr. Pulaski got off on the wrong foot with a lot of TNG fans because of her initial antagonism with the much-beloved Mr. Data. Personally, I think they lost a chance to tell some very interesting stories concerning the natures of artificial and human intelligence by dropping that antagonism, or skepticism, so soon.

The character of Dr. Pulaski was developed nicely over the course of season 2. I would have liked the character to been kept and further developed in later seasons. In view of the relationship that was developing between her and Worf the character would have been an asset in the Klingon Cycle stories that developed through the series. I could also see the character fitting in the DS9 milieu.
Sat, Apr 23, 2011, 1:51am (UTC -6)

I agree perfectly with what you write.

I add something more. It's right when you say that most of TNG fans hated her because of her skepticism for Data, at the beginning of the season.
But, come on, this is humanity; she does not underestimate him or humiliate him, she just has some doubts about the real complexity of Data. Later in the season, she seems to like him, even to understand him better than others.

Not speaking about the moment she shares with Worf which witnesses a development of the character.

Then I personally like that human and witty behaviour of her, above all with Picard; they have some communication problems at the beginning but you can feel that there is a lot of respect between Picard and Pulaski.

She is nice, sharp, brave and with strong personality; as Papa wrote, if she were in DS9 maybe fans would have loved her very much. Because DS9 focuses on characters.

I just say, let's not forget Pulaski from the universe of Star Trek characters.
Sun, Apr 24, 2011, 1:40am (UTC -6)
Just to add one more note of Pulaski appreciation, it was nice to see Diana Muldaur again after she guest starred in two TOS episodes. She was hot in the red mini-uniform in "Return to Tomorrow".
Sun, Apr 24, 2011, 2:43am (UTC -6)
Diana Muldaur is a good actress. Yep, she was twice in TOS (one is the episode you were referring to, "Return to tomorrow", and the other one is "Is there in truth no beauty?").
Tue, May 10, 2011, 1:56pm (UTC -6)
In watching season two for the first time in decades, I was struck once again by the contradictions inherent in the PC future of the Trek universe: In season one everyone falls all over themselves to declare the viability of a point of light found in "Home Soil" but in "The Child" abortion of Troi's child is discussed with nary a sign of concern. So all sentient life no matter what form it may take or how insignificant it is is worth moving heaven and earth to protect but an unborn human child isn't?
Sun, Jun 5, 2011, 11:32am (UTC -6)
So nice to see some love for Pulaski, Franco and papa--I sometimes thought I was the only one.

I commented on this (way above) a few years ago--Pulaski would wipe the floor with Crusher! She was so much more complex and not nearly so weak and whiny.
Sun, Jun 12, 2011, 10:26am (UTC -6)
Yes, Pulaski love at last!

I never really understood all that hate towards her. I guess it's because of the way she treated Data at the start of the season. But come on, she was a rare gem in TNG as a character who was actually fully human. She had prejudices, quirks, was pretty impatient and in your face -- a hugely differnt character when compared to all the others who were oh just so 24th century perfect.

And the tea ceremony with Worf was just fantastic. It shows her deep appreciation of other cultures on a fundamental level, not only as some politically correct mantra with no real substance.

Me likes Pulaski very much :)
Mon, Jul 2, 2012, 9:34am (UTC -6)
Continuing a tangent from "Schisms" (of all places)... another point in Pulaski's favor, often unremarked, is her uniform. Her sensible smock was the most dignified costume in all of Season 2. Imagine how different the series would've felt if the crew had all worn jackets like hers. Heck, the high collars were largely responsible for the turnaround in Season 3!
Wed, Aug 29, 2012, 6:40pm (UTC -6)
I was a fan of Dr. Crusher and Dr. Pulaski, but I was sorry to see Pulaski last just one season.

As for "The Child," it was bad. I was really fearing for this show at this time, but great episodes weren't far away!
Tue, Sep 18, 2012, 6:45am (UTC -6)
Personally, I always thought the dislike for Polaski wasn't so much her character as the fact that season 2 was horrible episode after horrible episode after horrible episode. That and she seemed somewhat like a gorgon.

Oddly enough she was in the TOS episode "Return to Tomorrow" and was quite attractive in that. Of course that was the 60s. And attractiveness isn't a prerequisite for a good character.
Fri, Dec 7, 2012, 9:02pm (UTC -6)
First episode of the season and it was just there. It didn't scare me as much as William, but it didn't excite me either. I'd say I thought S2 would play out just like the first (fortunately, I was wrong). At least, we got Marina Sirtis doing what she knows best: To Cry.

There were also a couple of changes, all for the better: Riker's beard (just the way I remembered him to be), the character of Guinan and Ten-Forward (that place gave TNG a much needed feeling of a lively place) and, of course, Dr. Pulaski.

I must admit my first impression of her was negative: In "The Child" she struck me as a character that knows too much, exactly what was needed for the plot to move forward. And that gave me Wesley Crusher's vibes all over again.

But as the episodes go on, I learned to like her. Franco, Papa, Grumpy and Paul: I totally agree with you guys, high five!

One thing about her that would have never gone anywhere is the forced Picard-Dr love interest. I can buy Beverly Crusher as a potential lover, but Pulaski?? Both Picard and her are too strong-willed to be attracted to each other.

I didn't notice how much I've become used to her until S3 and her magic departure. Crusher is a weaker character and a weaker actress. With all due respect to Gates McFadden, sometimes she says "Captain" like she was acting in a porno movie.
Sat, Dec 15, 2012, 12:13pm (UTC -6)
Pulaski sez...

"if I were to examine her now, I wouldn't be able to tell that she had a baby or had ever had a baby" did she make that determination except by examining her...what was with the "if"?
William B
Wed, Apr 3, 2013, 7:59am (UTC -6)
My big problem with this episode was that I couldn't understand why Troi was so blase about having the kid and about his rapid growth; we don't really get any scenes from Troi's POV about how she *feels* about him. I talked about it with my girlfriend (who is watching the show for the first time) and it took a long time to figure out why we reacted to the episode differently; she mostly liked it (or, rather, didn't understand why I was so critical of it, given that it's not exactly below the standard of quality set by season one, which is fair). Mostly though she felt that it was possible that the child would stop growing at a certain point and then stay a pre-teen and stay on the ship; I thought it was most likely that even if the kid hadn't disappeared into light at the episode's end, he would just keep aging at an accelerated rate and die within a week or two. I suppose there isn't actually enough information either way. Troi's relative lack of reaction to the ordeal she's put through while it's happening still doesn't work for me, but it makes more sense if on some level she thought that there would be time to sort her feelings out.

The other big problem is that I was not sure what the point of all of this is -- what aspect of the human condition is being illuminated here? Eventually I hit on the idea that maybe this is about the sorrows of parenting as a whole -- it is the experience of all parents, I guess, that they have children, raise them, and "before you know it" (ha) they grow up and leave and find their own way in the universe. It just happens with Troi and her "son" at a really accelerated rate. This thematic point is strengthened by having Wesley decide to leave the nest in this episode, too, staying on the Enterprise rather than joining his mother; so we effectively get the same story (son "grows up" and leaves mother behind) from the perspective of both a mother (Troi, through metaphor/SF) and the son (Wesley, more literally). That made me feel more charitable toward the episode, but it still doesn't emotionally land for me because I can never really get into Troi's headspace.

I read that the inspiration for the "carrying the plague" material was the French film The Wages of Fear, in which there is a truck carrying dynamite which is (of course) highly explosive. That movie is thrilling, suspenseful, and highly recommended; this episode's adaptation is, er, not. Part of it is that it's much easier to get a sense of danger within a film in which it is highly possible the trucks will actually blow up, and in which we have a really good understanding of how difficult it is to navigate difficult terrain and that type of thing.

Anyway, yeah, 2 stars.
William B
Wed, Apr 3, 2013, 8:03am (UTC -6)
Incidentally, I agree about earlier comments Pulaski -- I think she's a good character, very well acted, and highly underrated by the fandom. There is a clearer arc for her over the course of the season (her thawing out with respect to Data) than many characters get over the series as a whole. This episode isn't actually a great vehicle for her, though, because she exhibits as little curiosity about Ian as the episode as a whole does.
Thu, May 23, 2013, 4:04pm (UTC -6)
Ditto Pulanski, I think TNG needed a McCoy... As to the weaknesses of the child, well, I think it was tough to be too interested in him when he only lasted a few days and in the midst of a potentially life-threatening medical transfer!
Wed, Jul 10, 2013, 12:28pm (UTC -6)
TNG on BluRay FTW! TNG on DVD FTL!
Reverend Spork
Sat, Aug 24, 2013, 12:06am (UTC -6)
Another incredibly annoying Troi episode. Sirtis had a distressing tendency to overact in the first two seasons, and this episode was but one example. As for Pulaski, Muldaur is certainly a better actress than McFadden, but Dr. Crusher was a more interesting character. I think Pulaski suffered from the writers' lack of ability to give her a deeper character other than the Grouchy Skeptic and her one-dimensional arguments with Data.
Tue, Dec 24, 2013, 5:32pm (UTC -6)
I'm trying very, very hard to like TNG as much as ENT and VOY... But I couldn't stand the first episodes of the first season and I'm trying this one because I've been told the second season is much better.

Well not going by this episode, which was one of (if not THE) lamest episodes of Star Trek I've seen. Slow, boring, completely pointless.
Doug B
Sun, Dec 29, 2013, 12:30pm (UTC -6)
This is also a writer's strike casualty -- just as Shades of Grey was in a different way at the end of the season. The strike was in the summer of 1988. This was originally a script intended for the aborted series Star Trek: Phase II, which sorta morphed into the first Trek film. They did a quick rewrite on the script so they could get started right after the strike ended. Troi's part was originally Ilia's.
Sun, Apr 13, 2014, 6:33am (UTC -6)
Although the ratings are low for a reason I do think this was a great episode, great because of its campiness. How did they make up this stupid story? Anyway it was really amusing to see. I had the idea that the second general secretly was jealous that someone else gotten Crusher pregnant. It is good that if they cannot make a good espide at least make it campy and worth to laugh about.
Sun, Jun 8, 2014, 11:41am (UTC -6)
The developments of the Ian and container plotlines, including their connection, felt too predictable and thus the episode slow. Dr. Pulaski had a few moments in the season but in the early episodes she felt way too much like a McCoy knockoff.
Sat, Sep 13, 2014, 9:57pm (UTC -6)
I agree with the 2 star rating, an ok episode but very little of interest going on. I didn't like how the senior staff dealt with Troi in the briefing. They all coldly discuss her pregnancy like she's not even there, while Riker just acts like some jealous prick. "I don't mean to be indelicate, but who is the father?!" Finally she has to remind them all that she's still a person.
Thu, Nov 20, 2014, 9:37am (UTC -6)
Pulaski has all the arrogance and bombast of McCoy with none of the charm. Throughout the season, she persists in condescending, not only to Data, but to everyone around her. She's just an annoying character, and not at all compelling.

The problem is not Diana Muldaur -- she's an excellent actor. It's just this character -- she's never given any depth or humanity. It's like she's only there to lecture and pontificate.
Tue, Jan 13, 2015, 3:05pm (UTC -6)
Reading all this discussion about Pulaski, I suppose this is as good a place as any to talk about the Cast Reunion feature that was included on the TNG Season 2 Blu-Ray set. Not only was Diana Muldaur absent but Denise Crosby as well, which in both cases I thought was a shame. It seems they only invited those who were regulars for more than one season (Wil Wheaton WAS there even though he left early season 4).
Tue, Apr 21, 2015, 6:09am (UTC -6)
Just watched this creeptastic episode (yay, Netflix!), and I agree with a lot of the comments. The two main story lines are disjointed and without much tension. I spent most of the first half cringing whenever Troi was on screen, but I did feel a bit of vindication on her part in regards to Riker. His charming outburst questioning the identity of the "child's" father had me triumphantly (mentally) crowing, "In your face, Will Riker!" His wishy-washiness when it came to Troi always irritated me.

As for the virus plot... Zzzz. Dr. Porn-Stache's majestic facial hair was more riveting.

The one saving grace of the episode, I felt, came from an unlikely source: Wesley Crusher. He was helped along by Golberg's Guinan, of course. The conversation after she joined him at the viewport was one of the most genuinely human moments Wes ever had. The Ten Forward set provided an overall depth to the atmosphere of the Enterprise that we didn't realize we were missing until it appeared. It was a nascent glimpse of the Enterprise as being more than just a tin can full of random people. It was also a community.

Then Wes had to ruin the whole moment by, well, becoming Wes again.

Overall, this creepy/boring episode get's about a star from me, and that only because of Whoopie Golberg's injection of some much-needed class into it.
Sat, Jul 25, 2015, 5:45pm (UTC -6)
On its own, this episode is mediocre at best, but I actually like it as as the Season 2 starter for several reasons. First off, Season 1 for the most part was terrible. Dull storylines, bad writing, bad directing, and... well, it was just bad! I like that this story focuses on Riker and Troi, as those two bothered me more in Season 1 than any of the other characters. Riker was too militaristic and stiff, while Troi was just plain annoying. Both are shown in a much different light to start Season 2, softer in their approach and much more relatable... and the beard was a nice touch! Worf isn't so wide-eyed and naive anymore, and Geordi is now the Chief Engineer, again, another nice touch... On its own, not so good, but as the kickoff to the season by focusing on character development, not too shabby!
Mon, Aug 10, 2015, 8:22pm (UTC -6)
I loved Pulaski and it seems she's a character you either love or hate, it's such a shame that she just disappeared at the end of season 2, she really deserved better than that.
Diamond Dave
Sat, Aug 22, 2015, 11:29am (UTC -6)
I suppose this episode has a lot to introduce - notably Pulaski and Guinan and Ten-Forward, but also good to see Chief O'Brien and Riker's beard! - at the start of season 2.

It's then no real surprise that the story is a lightweight one that perhaps could have been developed further - although I thought that the implication that Ian would grow old and die was clearly present and it was nice that it was underplayed and not rammed in our face. I suppose the plot mechanism required a swift death, but having a kid (albeit an alien energy being) die first up in a series is a ballsy move. 2.5 stars.
Thu, Mar 31, 2016, 1:45pm (UTC -6)
I remember mishearing when Pulaski was introduced. I thought she was introduced as 'Captain Doctor Pulaski' and I thought: oh excellent- they've introduced a very senior medic as chief medical officer on the flagship and, although she won't be able to interfere with the command structure, she will have the opportunity to influence things significantly because they will be obliged to respect her opinion on all matters. Then I realised I'd misheard and she wasn't a captain at all and then she turned out to be a one-dimensional character who never got enough development. I'm not surprised she polarises opinion. It's a shame the actress never got the opportunity to cut loose with the character.
Mon, Apr 18, 2016, 11:32am (UTC -6)
The tension in season two seemed forced and unnatural. However, i liked Pulaski, Guinan, and the introduction of ten forward. I also the officer shuffling with Worf as security officer,and Geordi as chief engineer. We also get to see the borg in season two which was cool.
I do believe this season also suffered from a writers strike, i dont really know the details about this tho.
Sat, Aug 13, 2016, 6:52am (UTC -6)
Wow, finally you can write openly and admit that Pulaski was a very good character :-) It's so nice to see that after all these years there are many fans of her!
And to whom says that Pulaski's character development was not so good in this season, I invite you to watch it again: Pulaski is much more "evident" in one season than Crusher in 6 seasons!
Concerning a possible Pulaski-Picard affair, who did ask for that? If Pulaski stayed in TNG, we would have laughed a lot for this combination Picard-Pulaski-Data and her curiosity to learn about new cultures (see the episode with Worf).
Wed, Sep 28, 2016, 5:42am (UTC -6)
Couldn't stand Pulaski. Glad to see her go.
Thu, Nov 10, 2016, 12:34am (UTC -6)
I mostly dislike Pulaski for the very mundane reason that back during its original airing I didn't become a regular viewer of the show until season three, and so it's hard to accept anyone else other than Beverly Crusher as ship's doctor.

But that said, rewatching season 2, I'm starting to learn to hate Pulaski all over again for her treatment of Data and for just generally being a little too abrasive.
Mon, Jan 23, 2017, 2:27am (UTC -6)
I'm rewatching the second season now and am loving Pulaski. I never used to have an opinion about her one way or the other. I think what's happened is that I got used to being bored to death by Dr Beverley Blamd, and the spicier Pulaski now stands out on welcome relief.

Does B Crusher have any personality at all? Besides "dedicated doctor" and "worried mother"... What words would describe her?
Mon, Jan 23, 2017, 9:20am (UTC -6)

"Does B Crusher have any personality at all? Besides "dedicated doctor" and "worried mother"... What words would describe her?"

She outwitted the Borg when in command of the Enterprise, so "Skilled Leader" comes to mind. Also, of course "The Dancing Doctor" from "Data's Day" :)
Wed, Jan 25, 2017, 1:21pm (UTC -6)
I was a teen when I saw TNG the first time. And I remember having a crush on Wesley - and with the beginning of season 2 I can remember why. He was really cute then .
And to all the guys who found him annoying: not much more so than Deanna, whom you all liked just for her looks.
Fri, Jan 27, 2017, 4:57pm (UTC -6)
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
This episode borrows a Space 1999 story.
Not an auspicious start but the abrasive Pulaski is an improvement on her predecessor albeit too much like McCoy.Geordi and Worf of course work better in their new roles.
Sun, Mar 26, 2017, 9:51am (UTC -6)
At the senior staff meeting, Troi seems to anticipate the reaction of the others: she purposefully chooses a seat away from everyone else. Picard announces that Troi is pregnant, but it’s not until he adds that Troi’s going to have a baby that the others whip their heads around to stare at her. I know guys need stuff spelled out, but geez! Riker, Troi’s former Imazdi and the guy who beds whoever at the drop of a hat accusingly asks who the father is. The men go on to discuss the situation as though Troi is not even in the room. When Troi announces no matter what, she’s going to have the baby, Picard declares the meeting over. It seems to me that they would still need to discuss logistics. Though later Picard arranges for the presence of security forces at the birth of the child.

I understand some of Jammer’s criticism, but though we’re given a minimal of scenes, it is clear that Troi has some sort of bond or understanding or sense or communication with the life growing, quickly, within her. And her explanation to Picard that Ian will explain himself when he is cognitively able seems possibly valid. That ultimately that entity intruded on the Enterprise out of innocent curiosity is believable, since it exits as soon as it realizes it poses a threat.

Having Data at Troi’s side during the child’s delivery was effective. Having Riker soften when he actually sees the child’s delivery was also effective. But later, after the child’s death, no one gives a comfortingly comment or gesture to a distraught Troi. Guess she was inconsolable.

I agree that the script set up a premise that seemed to fall a bit flat. But something during the final scene, where the men each take a share in the responsibility of looking after Wesley since his mother will not be present, made me wonder if the male staff members had perhaps been touched by the way events unfolded.

As the opening episode of season two, changes have been made: Worf had already been made security head, now Georgi is head of Engineering and there’s a new doctor. The kind of changes one would expect on a ship. Spoiler alert: In the opening credits of the second season, the actress for the doctor is always listed as special guest star, leading one to wonder if Pulaski was always intended to be temporary. After Crusher returns, the crew remains intact (except for Wesley’s exit) and in the same positions for the duration of the series. Those actors would work well together, but Riker seemed to hang around longer than was fitting for his character.
Tue, Apr 18, 2017, 4:28pm (UTC -6)
Thought this was a clumsy episode - plenty of questions raised about the nature of the child and ultimately the answers are still bizarre.
I never minded Crusher as a character but Pulaski is quite different as others have noted. As a big fan of TOS, it's good to see her - as I liked her roles in the 2 TOS episodes. She does seem to take a greater authority about her tasks and is more direct.
Wesley's story about staying with the Enterprise and interaction with Guinan probably makes the most sense about this episode. I do like Guinan's psychiatrist roles.
I also thought Troi's role as mother giving birth was done well and her raising of the child was well-acted but it only becomes sort of clear at the end what was going on -- which is a bizarre tale tied to the hazardous cargo the ship was transporting. Anyhow, not a memorable episode for me. 1.5/4 stars.
Thu, May 11, 2017, 9:41am (UTC -6)
This is my first time watching Star Trek: TNG so I'm finding the comments very interesting. Season 1 was fun and I really enjoyed it, as with this episode. I wonder if fans returning to the series find it's not as good as they remember it, or having seen later episodes, they know how much better it will get? For me, it's pretty much exactly what I was expecting and I'm loving it.
Thoughts on this episode... Everyhthing looks better than season one, I don't know if that's the direction or the sets got an overhaul. It all feels more cinematic.
Was surprised to see Beverley gone, though I've kinda been spoiled on that now :P
Diana Muldaur Is a brilliant actress, loved her on L.A. Law back in the day, great addition to the cast.
Whoopi Goldberg! I love her. I knew she was in the series but wasn't expecting her till much later on. Awesome!
Miles O'Brien!! Obviously very important going forwards and this was yet another surprise.
So, much to like about this episode. Don't think I've been quite as floored by a shake up since Babylon 5 series 2.
Thu, May 11, 2017, 10:17am (UTC -6)
@Fandabidozi - Welcome! Are you new to Trek or TNG? You seem to know Miles maybe?


"wonder if fans returning to the series find it's not as good as they remember it, or having seen later episodes, they know how much better it will get? "

This. There are about 10 episodes between all of S1/S2 that are up to the quality of the rest of the series. Season 3-6 are pretty stellar. And 7, while looking a bit long in the tooth in some places, is merely not as good as 3-6. It's definitely still above 1&2. And it ends on a crazy high note.
Sarjenka's Little Brother
Wed, Jan 17, 2018, 12:05am (UTC -6)
Better than I remembered, though it's mostly the outer edges that save the show.

At the core, it doesn't work. There's simply not enough Troi/Ian time for there to be any emotional payoff at the end.

However, "The Child" definitely shows they've thought some things out from Season 1. I like how the changes are presented with little fanfare or exposition.

And I may be the only "Next Gen" fan who liked Dr. Crusher and Dr. Pulaski. I wish they had been on a show or two together.
Mon, Feb 5, 2018, 10:37am (UTC -6)
I feel this is an underrated episode, thanks solely to Rob Bowman's direction; his touch saves a number of episodes. Here he gives us some brooding, dark lighting, shows us new 10 Forward and Medical Bay sets, and he peppers his episode with little scenes or brief segments which really convey the feel of a large ship crewed by hundreds, each with their own little jobs.

The new warp effect - we see a ship go to warp from inside 10 Forward - is also great, as are other little Rob Bowman touches (we view characters through windows from a perspective outside the ship, Picard and Wesley share a near silent turbolift ride, we see Riker watching from afar as Troi gives birth etc). Rob's always trying to approach worn-out material from a fresh angle, and his episodes have a wonderful quality, plesantly relaxing and/or lethargic, yet able to expertly ramp up tension.
William B
Mon, Feb 5, 2018, 12:05pm (UTC -6)
@Trent, I went from mildly liking the episode when I was young, to strongly disliking it when I thought about it before watching it a few years ago, to somewhat disliking it when watching it, to being more positive about it after talking it over with my wife (then-girlfriend) who generally liked it. I think it's worth noting that there is something about it that is different from s1 tonally and suggests the way the show's writers, cast and especially directors (Bowman especially) are experimenting and trying to find what it is about the show that works. The Wesley material and the smooth, quiet introduction of the cast shake-ups (Geordi's movement to Engineering, Pulaski and Guinan's introduction) work very well for me, and there is a kind of sensitivity in the way the Troi material is handled -- Riker's reaction, for example -- that resonate, even though there is something both well-worn and relatively pointless about the Ian material directly. The only headway I've ever made with what this story is really about, besides the TNG-era optimism of the idea that aliens will be as curious about us as we are about them, and that apparent violations of personal sovereignty in this case might be forgivable lapses in beings who are not yet aware of what boundaries we consider important, is the sped-up notion of children as beings who briefly visit and then disappear from a mother's life, told from the perspective of the mother (Troi/Ian) and the child (Wesley/absent Beverly). This still doesn't quite gel with what I *remember to be* (though I could be wrong -- it has been a while) Troi's quasi-serene, nearly-disinterested reaction to the goings on, which I think is partly a signal that the writers and maybe Marina Sirtis hadn't gotten a handle on Troi as a person yet and were treating her as some magical symbol of distant, incomprehensible femininity ("Goddess of Empathy," as the Hollow Pursuits take would go) or something. But the episode has its moments, and I particularly remember the tone and visuals, particularly in the just-introduced Ten Forward, being impressive; I wouldn't mind revisiting it.
Preachy Petrus
Thu, Mar 8, 2018, 4:49pm (UTC -6)
Strength of character is not the same as a lack of self restraint and wisdom, decency, dignity, and loving are not the same as know it all, boring or simpering. Go ahead and hate me.
Prince of Space
Thu, Apr 5, 2018, 4:36am (UTC -6)
^ Years from now, since Jammers’ site is eternal, people will be reading these comments and still be saying, “What the heck is Petrus talking about!?!”

Hello, future people... are there flying cars yet in your time?
Tue, Apr 17, 2018, 5:01am (UTC -6)
I'm heartened by the warm reception that Pulaski has received from above commenters; I thought she was a great character and far superior to Dr Crusher, who I always thought rather bland.

Again, I must carry the torch for unloved counsellor Troi. I loved all her scenes and was genuinely touched by her grief at Ian's moving on.

One other thing I noticed about this episode is just how well directed and framed each shot is. The show has moved on a long way from Season 1 and is increasingly looking like the prestige sci fi drama most people remember TNG to be.
Wed, May 16, 2018, 12:33pm (UTC -6)
What a lame boring episode.

Haven't seen a TNG episode for 20 years...have been working through the series having just finished the entire series of DS9. What a (backwards) change in Miles!

Troi is cloying and annoying. So is Riker. Used to watch TNG all the time in the 90s...but not liking as I remembered it. Maybe just have to wait for S.3 for things to get better.
Sat, May 19, 2018, 7:05pm (UTC -6)
I'll take the blandness of Beverley over the abrasive arrogance of Pulaski any day. Beverley was easier on the eyes too.
Sun, May 20, 2018, 8:51pm (UTC -6)
BTW, I'm sure that the biblical immaculate conception disdn't imvolve penetration. Troi was raped and apparently liked it this time.
Wed, Jul 18, 2018, 4:01pm (UTC -6)
Really? So many comments, and only one mentions, that Troi was RAPED?
Tue, Aug 14, 2018, 9:35pm (UTC -6)
It was nuts that they just allowed Troi's mystery possession pregnancy while in the middle of a critical and dangerous mission.

They should have put her in a shuttle or whatever with a doctor since she was determined to have the baby.

One nice touch-- in the briefing when they reveal it's some sort of alien pregnancy, Worf turns and stares at her. It's nice because Worf is typically depicted in a very non subtle way.
Sun, Mar 3, 2019, 2:32pm (UTC -6)
I liked the overall structure of this one and the interplay at the end of the two stories. I guess this was the intro to Dr Pulaski. When I watched this 30 years ago, my overall preference was for Dr Crusher over Dr Pulaski I think due to my impression of Dr Pulaski's overall brusqueness. Now I appreciate her more. (Except how she treats Data , I guess she was given the role to be dismissive of Data somewhat comparable to Bones dismissing Spock?)

She is professional and direct; she assumes a role and behaviour you would expect on a mission as important as theirs where the staff are expected to be professional and she has an important role as chief medical officer and not just a friendly neighbourhood country doctor.

Troi wasn't too bad. Riker and Worf were pathetic in their unprofessional and emotional reaction to her pregnancy. Riker was possessive and jealous. The way they spoke about Troi as if she was a possession just says it all. I liked the way Troi shut them down and Picard backed her up. Nice!

But this was quite a big episode in terms of a friendly creature creating a human baby and accelerating its growth. Wouldn't you expect Troi to be going to Earth to be interviewed etc. It is just brushed off in the episodic world of TNG. This is where I miss DS9.

Wed, Mar 6, 2019, 11:34pm (UTC -6)
The first thing I notice popping open Season 2 is the vastly improved camera work. Better panning, closeups, and a lot more angles. It’s very noticeable after having watched all of Season 1 together. Also, Riker looking sexy with that new beard and Worf and Laforge in their new gold uniforms.

I can’t make up my mind between Crusher/Polaski. I do think Polaski got way too much hate and I always liked her. But I also like Crusher too, probably more for sentimental and nostalgic value despite that I can now see the weaknesses in her character better.
Sat, Mar 23, 2019, 9:39pm (UTC -6)
Markus said: "I can’t make up my mind between Crusher/Polaski. I do think Polaski got way too much hate and I always liked her."

I think Pulaski simply got better material to work with. Crusher got maybe two scripts which pushed her character somewhere interesting. Pulaski was getting meaty little scenes from the get-go. She was like a little pit-bull, always clawing at the main cast, and I liked this quality about her.

As for this episode, which I've just seen a third time, I still think it's underrated. Here we have a tale of a son growing and losing a mother (Wesley losing Beverly) and a mother losing a fast-growing son (Troi losing her alien kid), both plots hinging on the child's hunger for exploration. For it's first half, it's also a pleasantly creepy and horrific episode. And one whose themes of (re)birth work nicely (accidentally? intentionally? unconventionally?) as a season 2 premiere.

It's big flaw, however, is how Troi is written once she gives birth. She far too readily, and hokily, becomes a maternal caricature. She seems to forget that she's given birth to a creepy alien baby, and instead parades it about the ship like she's a 1950s housewife. Virtually every scene with Troi once she's given birth, is awful, especially when she finally loses the kid, breaks down, and nobody (not even Riker!) offers her a hug or condolences. It's a shame this half of the arc is botched, because everything else in this episode is extremely good.
No scarcity economics
Tue, May 7, 2019, 8:28pm (UTC -6)
You found out Ian was born to Troi to learn the human life cycle? Was this stated in the episode or was the conclusion made from the obvious implication of Ian's existence? I don't recall the child ever explaining himself, besides that he was the source of the "deadly substance", which was called a plasma virus by the way.
No scarcity economics
Tue, May 7, 2019, 8:30pm (UTC -6)
Excuse me, source of the Eichner radiation agitation of deadly substance is what I meant to say.
Lizzy DataLover
Fri, May 10, 2019, 11:07pm (UTC -6)
Dr. Katherine Pulaski is A FUCKING COLDHEARTED BITCH. She was a horrible replacement for the caring Dr. Crusher, and was unbelievably insufferable to say the least. And don't even get me started on her treatment of poor innocent Data. "Counselor Troi needs the warm touch of a human, not the cold hand of technology." The fuck???? What kind of a randomly horrible thing is that to say? And Data continues to he as nice as HUMANLY possible to her, and yet every time he's around she feels the sudden urge to rip him a brand new one. It's ridiculous.

Also, this episode sucked. It's only redeeming scene was of course with Data being all fascinated and mystified by the miraculous birth taking place before him. That was the true curious, life-loving side of him; that enchanted look on his face; that we so unfortunately didn't get to see too much of after the first couple seasons.
Dave in MN
Sat, May 11, 2019, 9:15am (UTC -6)
@ Lizzy Datalover

I have to agree with you.

Pulaski is racist to Data. There's another episode where she calls Data "it" and she's constantly ragging on him for not meeting up to her standard of sentience, self-agency and respect.

I also don't care for her attitude: "I'm gonna do what I want because I'm a badass doctor and if you don't like it, kiss my ass."

No, you aren't a superhero. See those pips on your uniform, Pulaski? That's called your "rank" and you have one because you are part of a quasi-military organization with a hierarchical structure.

Also, your bedside manner sucks.
Sat, May 11, 2019, 10:58am (UTC -6)
Not that I’m a big Pulaski fan, but this season sets up somewhat of an arc where Pulaski distrusts Data and technology generally but she gradually learns that her preconceptions about artificial life are completely wrong. This culminates in some great payoffs for the Data-Pulaski relationship later in “The Measure of a Man” and “Peak Performance” where Pulaski accepts Data and starts rooting for him.
Lizzy DataLover
Tue, May 14, 2019, 9:02pm (UTC -6)
@ Dave in MN

I'm so glad I have people on my side in this. You're right she is racist to Data. Which completely does not fit into the realm of Star Trek. Sure, McCoy gave Spock a hard time once and a while, but I think it was more of a "just remember you're not the God of logic or anything, you have frailties just like the rest of us" sort of way. Which Spock obviously didn't think of himself like that, but like all vulcans he knew he was somewhat superior to humans, even though he did have the same basic emotions and possible struggles as we do. So he was just trying to remind him of that, as I think most people were.

Dr. Pulaski on the other hand is snapping at Data in a "just remember you're place among humans. You're the tricorder, I'm the person, and don't you step out of that line" sort of way. And even if she eventually became more tolerable of him, *key word being tolerable* I think she still refused to see him entirely on the same level as everyone else she knew. When she called him "it" she apologized saying she wasn't used to working with non-living devices, which is one of the worst possible insults you could give Data because not only does it degrade him to the level of a thing, but it says that he has no life whatsoever, which at least would have been something.

I think that says it all right there on just how willing she is to accept that which is different. Which is what Star Trek was founded on, was it not?
Tue, May 14, 2019, 10:54pm (UTC -6)

What is it exactly you find objectionable about Dr. Pulaski's attitude toward Data? As far as I'm concerned, if we upgrade Data from a machine to a living thing, then by necessity we downgrade all living things to an assembly of matter and limbs. Do you really find nothing special about life that it can be described as an arrangement of molecules and nothing more than that?
Lizzy DataLover
Tue, May 14, 2019, 11:18pm (UTC -6)

The very fact that you said download Data from "a machine to a living thing" was the point I was trying to make about Pulaski. Data is already a living thing. At least IMO. I see life as the force that connects us all and integrates everything into existence. It does not matter whether one is organic or mechanical. *at least IMO.* I tried to make a similar point when posting about The Measure Of A Man.

Data is a living being entirely unique, and not necessarily describable by our standards for life. And his incredibly human qualities show that time and again. Every time I watch an episode I can plainly see that he is much more than just a computer with limbs, he is a life. And my problem is, that that just never seemed to click with Dr. Pulaski, at least not until much later. Everyone else on the Enterprise *with the exception of any rare moments of doubt* accepted him rather easily for who is was, rather than what. They talk to him like he is any other member of the crew. Pulaski however, treated him as if he were less. And she never gave herself one spare moment to believe that perhaps she could think of him as more than just an artifical imitation of man, but as an actual man. She simply ignored that possibility, telling herself 'now remember, he's artifical, you should make a big deal out of it' even at times when that wasn't something that really even mattered.

So you should really be questioning her belief in life, because it seems she is very close minded to the possibilities of what it could be.
Tue, May 14, 2019, 11:45pm (UTC -6)

The problem as I see it is that you are not sufficiently distinguishing between appearance and reality. You say you can plainly see that Data is alive. But if a computer could appear to walk, talk and interact with others and yet still be completely unaware it is doing so, would it still under your definition be considered alive? Just because Data appears to do these things and appears to imitate life doesn't necessarily mean anything. Yes, Pulaski is prejudiced but that by itself does not mean she is wrong about Data. We treat computers as if they are 'less' than human and most people would say there are valid reasons for doing so. If in truth Data is no more than a extremely complicated and intelligent computer then by placing him on the same level as living beings we are devaluing life itself. And even leaving aside consciousness, perhaps Dr. Pulaski was aware that as of 2019, humans were yet to create anything more intelligent than the simplest living organism, and with good reason doubted Soong's ability to synthesize life in any form whatsoever.
Lizzy DataLover
Tue, May 14, 2019, 11:46pm (UTC -6)
Whoops I meant upgrade not download. :P

But seriously dude why do you think that? Is it so hard to believe that maybe life is more than just being born flesh and blood? Giving Data the title of 'living status' does not mean that we, by comparison are anything less. In fact by inviting the possibility of Data being more than he supposedly is, actually means life is even more than just what you're made out of. Why should only organic beings be allowed to have life? I'm not saying that any old tricorder is alive and sentient, *although ya never know*;) I'm saying that if Data, a being with a positronic brain of all things, can be truly alive, then that means that life *is* more than just an arrangement of molecules and is something far greater, something much more mystical than we'll ever know.

And one more thing; Star Trek is a show about life and all its different forms, and exploring and learning to understand those different forms. So if this is truly how you believe then I question why you watch it.
Wed, May 15, 2019, 12:25am (UTC -6)
"I'm saying that if Data, a being with a positronic brain of all things, can be truly alive, then that means that life *is* more than just an arrangement of molecules and is something far greater, something much more mystical than we'll ever know."

And yet Soong knew enough to be able to create it. You can't have it both ways: either life is completely demystified by Soong's ability to create it, or Data and any other arrangement of matter does not give rise to life on any other level than in appearance. If we accept that Soong can create life out of matter, we have to accept it is no more mystical than a machine.

These issues are all ones I find interesting and believe Star Trek is open to and encourages their discussion. That's why I watch it.
Lizzy DataLover
Wed, May 15, 2019, 12:34am (UTC -6)

You said *if* he is an extremely complicated and intelligent computer. What if he's not? Then what? Is that so hard to believe? You really need to watch The Measure Of A Man. Because in that episode Captain Louvois says that these very questions are meant for saints and philosophers. Although I doubt even they could give us our answer. This is a *big* issue which we may never have the true answer to.

Although being the fighter I am, I would like to add another thing: you also compared Data to a computer that walks and talks and interacts with people without being aware of doing so. But Data is aware. He knows exactly who and what he is. He even aspires and even *desires* to improve himself and become more than whatever he truly is. And the same for his brother Lore, who is, basically, a very complex person with a very complex personality. He even holds malace towards his father for both condemning him to an existence that will always be questioned, *like right now* and for treating him like nothing more than a machine himself, by tearing him apart and leaving him behind. I dont know, sounds pretty alive to me.

You know you remind me a lot of Commander Maddox in that way, but everyone kinda hated that guy's guts so...
Wed, May 15, 2019, 7:58am (UTC -6)
Siri and Alexa are alive too. They say hello and goodbye, they let me know what songs I should listen too before I even ask, and they’re just so darn polite. I can’t stand it when people are rude to Siri!
Dave in MN
Wed, May 15, 2019, 8:40am (UTC -6)
Too bad we can't post a poll on here.

Simple question: Is Data alive?

My vote is yes.
Lizzy DataLover
Wed, May 15, 2019, 10:13am (UTC -6)
My vote is also yes Dave. I just hope that I've gotten through to either Thomas or someone out there who doesn't want to believe in the power of Data. I also hope that if he's still listening we can agree to disagree on this one because I will keep fighting for Data until the end so this could go on forever. :)

Star Trek power!!
Wed, May 15, 2019, 1:12pm (UTC -6)
Saying Data is alive is answering the easy question. The show itself never really sides with Pulaski and - while Maddox puts on a good show vis-à-vis Riker - I don't think we as the audience are ever really meant to take the position that Data is merely a machine. The show gives Data a soul. He's something more special, more unique, and more *alive* than a mere machine. And that is the showrunners' intent.

A more difficult question that I think Thomas and Charles are getting at is: when do we start recognizing AI as life in our time? Obviously Siri is not alive, but what is she missing that would make her like Data? A physical body? A more complex social program?

Lizzy and Dave, if someone told you today that they just created artificial life that's similar to a human's, would you readily embrace it a revolution, or would you like to see this life in action first before making a decision? I think it's normal to have a little Pulaski-like skepticism in a unique situation like this. Being skeptical doesn't make you "racist", it just means you like to have more facts before you decide.
Lizzy DataLover
Wed, May 15, 2019, 1:24pm (UTC -6)

I guess I do have to agree with everything you said. *mostly the nice things you said about Data* ;) and perhaps you're right if someone approached me and said they just created sentient artifical life I may want to see for myself. Siri and Alexa *no offense Charles I love them too* are obviously very different from Data and not entirely comparable in this situation, so presenting them may not be as impressive. But if you gave me someone as complex and human like as Data, I may be very well inclined to believe that perhaps there is something to the whole AI thing.

And you're right, we are meant to be on Data's side every step of the way, so I'm obviously more inclined to defend him than I might be in real life. But I have to say, that if the time ever does come when someone out there is able to create a being like him I will be eager to see the potential.

I just love Data so much I cant help but see him for the wonderfully kindhearted man he is! XD
Wed, May 15, 2019, 2:10pm (UTC -6)
Data is obviously sentient and sapient.

Not sure why TNG insisted on using the word "alive" in this context, which is kinda misleading. Amoebas are also alive, after all.
Lizzy DataLover
Wed, May 15, 2019, 2:38pm (UTC -6)

Awesome name by the way. It's true that Data is obviously sentient and sapient based on the way he acts and integrates himself into society and the relationships he has with others. But I for one would like to think he is more than just a self aware collection of circuits and sub processors, and is truly the mechanical equivalent of a living human being with needs and feelings. Okay well I know the feelings part is kind of on shaky ground, but if you've seen all the Data episodes, then you know he's got a lot more going on than he believes. ;)

What's that Data? You say you can't feel anything? Ok sure I believe you. (Wink wink winkity wink)
Lizzy DataLover
Wed, May 15, 2019, 3:07pm (UTC -6)
Also, commenting on what Chrome said, I would like to say that I do understand how one might be skeptical in this situation, but there is a difference between being skeptical and being flat out disrespectful. Data is an officer, and a darn good one at that, a member of the team, and is considered sentient and even *alive* (as his service record supposedly states) by Starfleet. So going in with a closed mind, but willing to explore his possibilities would have been much more tolerable than the way Pulaski basically snorts at Data and gives him such a holier than thou attitude all the time.

I really just don't appreciate the rude disrespectful and frankly unprofessional manner she presents to him. Always spewing "oh God, not this *thing* again" under her breath constantly. (Although she actually just said it all straight to his face which was far worse.)
Thu, May 16, 2019, 4:52am (UTC -6)
To throw a wrench into this little machine love fest.

Data is not alive.

He misses two main aspects of life.
- He or should I say IT doesn't procreate
- His or should I say ... ehh the right English word... ehh its?... processes can be inactive for an infinite amount of time. You can switch him off for a million years and then switch him on and he will be as good as new.

Also Pulaski had some spunk while Crusher was just a humanoid care bear. She was absolutely right to question the green emotionless machine!
Thu, May 16, 2019, 6:20am (UTC -6)
I guess you can call me “it” since the vasectomy.
Thu, May 16, 2019, 7:29am (UTC -6)
@Lizzy Datalover

You misunderstood me. I'm on your side here :-)

I completely agree with you that Data has all the important qualities that humans have. He is a person no less than you or I. In fact, I find him to be a far better person then most humans I know.

My point was simply that the TNG writers often confused "being alive" with "being a person" when these terms refer to two completely different things. An amoeba is alive, but we don't consider it a person. The traditional definition of life (movement, growth, procreation etc) are simply not relevant to the issue at hand.


Data is a conscious, intelligent, self-aware being with desires and goals, and that makes him a person. That's all that matters.

*cough* Lal *cough*
Thu, May 16, 2019, 7:32am (UTC -6)
If you are a machine then I would have called you it from the moment of your activation! Are you a machine?

Alives first!
Thu, May 16, 2019, 7:38am (UTC -6)
@ Omicron
HA! You walked right into my trap. Muahaha. Lal wasn't like Data and more importantly Lal wasn't from Data.

There are three ways to procreate: Mitosis, meiosis and parasitic lifeforms.

Only because this talking tricorder walked into a tool shed and made another machine doesn't mean that he procreates.
Thu, May 16, 2019, 8:20am (UTC -6)

You're too smart and too sensitive a person to actually believe what you just wrote.

I've noticed a trend in the stuff you wrote in the past day or so. You've become more and more confrontational while also making less and less sense. I guess you're in one of those "I'm bored and life sucks so I'm going to troll Jammer's site with random provocative musings" phases, aren't you?

Pity. I was really starting to enjoy our conversations in the past few days.
Lizzy DataLover
Thu, May 16, 2019, 12:00pm (UTC -6)

I do see your point and I'm glad you're on my side. Thank you for defending Data in my absence!!


How dare you call him an "it". How dare you. Hoooow dare you. You're worse than Pulaski. I am no longer going to acknowledge you on this board.

And this is Star Trek man! Anyone can be alive if they want to be! HOPE FOR THE FUTURE!!!!
Thu, May 16, 2019, 4:22pm (UTC -6)
@ Omicron
Do we actually know each other that well already. Troubling. It is true. I'm stressed out again. Decisions. I feel like being on the Hindenburg and Lakehurst is in sight.

No, I don't think Data is a soulless machine. Apart from the actual discussion, he is clearly written as being alive. Just playing devils advocate.

Seriously though two important signs of life are procreation and constant patterns like cells metabolizing. But there is no real fixed definition laid out by some council in Switzerland which means that anything can be defined as being alive.

People here often start discussing stuff without clearly defining the words they are talking about which bothers me.
Lizzy DataLover
Thu, May 16, 2019, 4:46pm (UTC -6)
You are all making very good points I just hate it when people talk crap about Data. He's such a wonderful character, and to me he just seems like such a wonderful person. Every time some dumb jerky extra comes on the show and gives him *that look* I just get soooooooo pissed off. It's like, whhhhyyyyyyyyy????

I know I'm getting emotional here. But I seriously think that there is real potential in who Data is, and what could soon become him in our actual future.

Also is it too late to change my username to Data Got The feels?? Lol
Thu, Jun 27, 2019, 9:19pm (UTC -6)
I definitely agree w/all those who hated Pulaski. I never liked her. I just saw this episode, and I guess I didn't realize she was such an uber bitch to Data for no reason when I was younger. Her attitude toward him in this episode is ridiculous. She mispronounces his name, then pronounces it correctly, and the says "whatever" b/c she doesn't actually care. Even if I thought he was just a machine, if he took the time to correct the pronunciation of his name, I would call him by the name he wanted me to use!
Fri, Aug 9, 2019, 6:18am (UTC -6)
Well, a so-so start to the Season, but I'll take it.

Ep seems to be about LIFE. What is life, is man made life (Data, genetically engineered viruses) really life? When does life begin, what defines it? Pulaski asks Data if he could possibly have feelings; Picard asks if Ian can talk and Ian comments on his wet face and hurt finger.

And lots of talk of growth: life means growth and change.

In our exploration of what constitutes life, we even get an abortion discussion, complete with fetus on screen and a bunch of men discussing what should happen to Troi's body. Days later asks Deanna if her unborn child is sentient.

But ultimately, Life is defined by Death - lots of references to the crew's, and the desperately ill victims' of an outbreak,
vulnerability to death, and of course, Ian dies.

And there's love and attachment and sustenance - We have a motherless child (Wes) and a childless mother (Deanna). Fortunately, Worf volunteers to tuck Wes took bed. Others must sustain him

Lots going on in the ep, but I'm too tired to think.

Picard has never played with puppies???

Average offering overall.

Ciao, Treksters
Fri, Aug 9, 2019, 10:36am (UTC -6)

It's interesting, I often pass over this episode but reading your comments makes me think that this season tends to talk about "What is life and death?" and "What is the nature of life?" quite often. Feels like season two had quite the group of philosophers on board its writing team. :-)
William B
Fri, Aug 9, 2019, 12:11pm (UTC -6)
This episode contains one of the strongest pieces of evidence for Wesley as Mary Sue, which is that upon getting *Whoopi Goldberg* to be on the show, the very first use they put her to is to convince Wesley to stay. I say that half-joking and half with affection.

In retrospect I feel a little better about this one than I did earlier on. I think that the material surrounding the transitions and introductions and (offscreen) departures (Beverly, Wesley, Pulaski, Guinan) is pretty good, and looking at the Ian Andrew material through the lens of the cast reshuffling makes the episode broadly about not just life but about the way people (especially children) enter and leave our lives.
William B
Fri, Aug 9, 2019, 12:14pm (UTC -6)
And of course Riker's beard, Geordi's being in Engineering, Worf's security post being more official. It's pretty low-key. Most of what's good about this episode is really quite incidental to the main story (which is a hastily rewritten script from the, following Worf's suggestion, killed-in-infancy Star Trek II series).
Fri, Aug 9, 2019, 4:33pm (UTC -6)
@William B

There is a focus on children, but I think all the changes and comings and goings and such are part of the overall "growth and change" that is shown.

We're conceived, we're born, we grow physically and emotionally and intellectually, we experience joy and sorrows, pleasure and pain, we age, we die. Change and growth is a constant from start to finish.


I think the first Season had a lot of episodes about the past - the impact of the past, the need to let go of it, etc. This Season seems to be taking a different turn.

PULASKI : Read the review and comments and want to add: I love Pulaski. She's a scientist and she's trying to categorize Data. She's never seen anything like him. She knows he's a machine.

And though the ep focuses more on childhood and living in general, there's a hint of what we'll see more of: Not just what it means to be alive, but what it means to be human. Pulaski's pokes at Data all Season long, figuring out just what he is. Pulaski is a very strong and straightforward person and she does it in her own way.

The idea that her acerbic nature is somehow worse than McCoy's - can't see that AT ALL. I love both characters. I like Beverly OK, but Pulaski better. Wish we could have had them both. Might've made for a good friendship and some nice tension.

Submit a comment

◄ Season Index

▲Top of Page | Menu | Copyright © 1994-2019 Jamahl Epsicokhan. All rights reserved. Unauthorized duplication or distribution of any content is prohibited. This site is an independent publication and is not affiliated with or authorized by any entity or company referenced herein. See site policies.