Main Sections
- Main Index
- Jammer's Blog
- Caprica
- Battlestar Galactica
- ST: Enterprise
- ST: Voyager
- ST: Deep Space Nine
- ST: Next Generation
- ST: Feature Films
- ST: Original Series
- Andromeda
- Articles & Misc.

Site Info & More
- Overview
- Jammer's Notes
- RSS Feeds
- Mobile Edition
- Review Mailer
- Comment Policy
- FAQ
- Feedback
- The Rating Scale
- About the Author
- Plain-Text Edition
- Copyright & Disclaimer

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

Valid CSS!

Jammer's Review
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine
"Far Beyond the Stars"
****
Air date: 2/8/1998
Teleplay by Ira Steven Behr & Hans Beimler
Story by Marc Scott Zicree
Directed by Avery Brooks
Review by Jamahl Epsicokhan
"You see, Albert's got the right idea. He's not interested in Negroes or whites. He writes about robots."
"That's because he is a robot."
-- Douglas and Herb

Nutshell: Wonderful, classic Trek. A socially aware issue episode that's also an engrossing reflection upon Trek's own spirit.

Captain Benjamin Lafayette Sisko: portrayed by the engaging African-American actor Avery Brooks. Does it matter that Captain Sisko is black? In the color-blind 24th century, it's a non-issue. The word "black" (which, to my knowledge, has never directly been used to describe a Trekkian character) might as well be in the same group of descriptive words as "tall" or "bald." No character sees Sisko as a "black captain"--he's just "the captain." The case is similar for Voyager's female Captain Janeway. For the purposes of Trek, I think that's absolutely the way it should be. In 400 years, I hope we will have improved race and gender relations to the point that everyone can immediately accept people for who they are, rather than scrutinizing their ethnic background. I know--it sounds like a trite, obvious sentiment, but aren't the most universal statements always trite-sounding after they've been said so many times?

Next question: Does it matter that actor Avery Brooks is black? Deep Space Nine may take place almost 400 years from now, but let's face it: Reality is 1998, and no matter what your stance is, race issues are still relevant to most people in our society.

On a personal note, I find it very refreshing to see a black hero as the lead for a mainstream television series. In my opinion there are not, for whatever reason, enough impacting black characters in television drama (excepting Homicide: Life on the Street), so when DS9 premiered in 1993, I was pleased to see an African American leading a Star Trek series--a franchise which has always prided itself on forward thinking and social commentary.

But before this review turns into a column on race relations in the 1990s, let me frame my point in terms of this week's story. This episode, for the first time in DS9's run, utilizes Avery Brooks' character as "black." It accomplishes this by putting Brooks' in the role of Bennie Russell, a science fiction writer trying to make it in 1953, when racism built up the walls blocking opportunity.

"Far Beyond the Stars" is what it's all about, people. This is a perfect example of what makes Trek what it is: not just entertainment, but entertainment with a social awareness that goes beyond the technology, adventure, and space journeys, and into the exploration of the human condition.

The slice of Bennie's life is a dream that Sisko has when he falls unconscious, exhibiting medical readings and bizarre mental activity similar to when he had his visions in last year's "Rapture." The dream idea is itself interesting, and even though this was intended as a single-shot, stand-alone episode, there are little details within "Far Beyond the Stars" that make one wonder if the Prophets weren't somehow set on giving Sisko this vision for a specific purpose.

Bennie Russell's daily troubles begin with the editor of the sci-fi magazine he writes for: a man named Douglas (Rene Auberjonois), whose cowardice epitomizes the dangers of embracing a slanted status quo. He's a prime example of covert racism: Sure, he has a Negro writer on his staff, but he's unwilling to acknowledge that man's identity. "As far as our readers are concerned," he says, "Bennie Russell is as white as they are. Let's just keep it that way." He explains away all social responsibility for his own actions and opinions by blaming society--simply excusing his own close-mindedness on "the way things are."

Early in the episode, Douglas explains that the writing staff will be in a photo to be published in the next issue. Nobody is surprised when Douglas tells Bennie and Kay (Nana Visitor), the staff's only woman, to "oversleep" the day the photo is to be taken. "It's nothing personal," he tells Bennie. But that's the point--racism (and sexism) is rarely a personal issue.

When Roy, the resident artist (J.G. Hertzler), shows Bennie an intriguing drawing of a space station, Bennie is hit with an overwhelming inspiration. The next day he comes to work with a completed story about this space station--a place called Deep Space Nine--which is commanded by a black captain. The other writers love it. But it doesn't matter, because Douglas won't print it. "Your hero is a Negro captain ... It's not believable." Left with no option but to either make the captain white or not have the story published, Bennie suffers a defeat while maintaining his integrity. Because Douglas isn't willing to make a difference, Bennie's story is rendered useless.

Armin Shimerman portrays Herb, a forward-thinking liberal who represents the antithesis of Douglas. Throughout the episode, Herb hounds Douglas for his conservatism, and encourages Bennie to tell his story just as he wants to. Herb is interesting because he represents the other view--the side that realized that individuals had to make personal efforts to overcome the generally held opinions of the masses.

Also appropriate given the era of McCarthyism is Douglas' suggestion that Herb is a communist. "Far Beyond the Stars" benefits from a number of such historic touches. The casting of Michael Dorn as a Negro baseball player who has been inducted into the Major Leagues makes sense, and adds to the running commentary dialog.

"Far Beyond the Stars" is, of course, obviously intended as a Trekkian "message" episode, but there's much more to it than that. Anyone who sees this purely as a soapbox preaching is missing a lot of the story's more general elements. After all, this episode is also wonderful entertainment. Dropping all the DS9 regulars into these new roles is interesting for the novelty value alone, particularly giving human roles to the actors who are usually in makeup. I greatly enjoyed Shimerman as the lively liberal; and Auberjonois in that '50s-looking haircut and glasses; and Farrell as the ditzy New Yorker secretary Darlene, and Meaney as Albert, the "robot" writer who can never come up with the words he's looking for; and even Aron Eisenberg as a newsstand boy.

Then there's the Harlem setting, featuring Penny Johnson as practical woman Cassie, who just wants to marry Bennie and settle down; Dorn's engaging turn as Willie, the baseball star with the big ego; and especially the impressively convincing Cirroc Lofton as the charismatic but troublesome Jimmy--a cynic with little hope who is spiraling down into crime.

The atmospherics alone are worth the hour's view. The period costuming and production design looks great, and Dennis McCarthy's score is like a breath of fresh air. It's always enjoyable when the series gets off its standing sets, and even more enjoyable when such special settings are utilized for a story.

All things considered, I'm giving "Far Beyond the Stars" four stars because it falls into the category of great Trek. However, I think I'd better address one issue that may be on some people's minds: There's a melodramatic overture in "Far Beyond the Stars," and some are undoubtedly going to find it a little excessive and possibly obvious.

The two cops played by Marc Alaimo and Jeffery Combs, for example, are little more than shady, two-dimensional characters used to further crush Bennie's character into his tortured place in the world. Their racially motivated evil actions--shooting Jimmy for breaking into a car, and then severely beating Bennie when he reacts to his friend's death--are anything but sudden and subtle. But in the end, isn't that the whole point? Racism in the 1950s was hardly subtle, either.

The episode's climax follows from the idea of Bennie as a symbol of despair. The structure of the show sets him up for a terrible fall. There's a point when Douglas finally permits Bennie to go forward with submitting his Deep Space Nine story for the month's magazine run--provided he turns the premise into a dream (supposing people will be more open to it if "it never really happened"). Bennie is overjoyed with the hope of a major breakthrough that could have meaningful aftereffects. But then the publisher pulps the issue and, furthermore, orders Bennie's termination.

I'll admit that I think Avery Brooks may have overacted his payoff scene a tad more than he needed to. It seemed a little uneasy upon first viewing. But when I watched it again, it seemed to work better. If you think it through, Bennie is an example of one man who has reached his limits and can't take any more. Just when a lifetime of frustrations and fruitless patience finally seemed like it was going to pay off, he finds himself starting all over again with nothing gained, and no progress made. He loses it. "Nervous breakdown" would probably be an applicable '90s term.

But I think it goes even further than that--something that extends into destiny or prophecy. The mysterious street preacher (Brock Peters) offers cryptic words of foresight on more than one occasion, and much of what he has to say is reflected in Bennie's struggle. The fact that "hope and despair walk arm in arm" is particularly interesting given Bennie's defeat when considered alongside the implicit, unseen results of his writings. Indeed, there seems to be more at stake here than what concrete events can explain. As Bennie is reduced to a broken, crying heap on the floor, he professes that his characters cannot be destroyed--because he created them, they're real, and they exist somewhere, whether his story was published or not. And that's something that I think may have more literal implications than what anyone but Bennie can know. After all, these fictional characters had become a part of Bennie more than Bennie himself could ever have expected. When he was inspired with the idea of DS9, he began having hallucinations--seeing Sisko's reflection when he should've been seeing his own, and sometimes seeing his characters in his friends and co-workers. At one point he finds reality skewed, believing he is inside his own story.

This is Star Trek taking a leap into an unknown that only the truly great sci-fi ideas strive for. When Sisko wakes up, there's a sense that Bennie's existence goes beyond that of a simple dream. Given the mystical DS9 lore involving Bajoran prophecies and wormhole aliens, I seriously wonder if this wasn't a pivotal part of Sisko's own existence--and maybe even the Trekkian fictional history. The ending makes one seriously wonder about the nature of Bennie Russell's existence.

It's strange how many levels of poignancy Sisko's final reflection conveys. At one level, Sisko ponders his dream about this distant, tragic person who had a hopeful vision. On another level, Sisko wonders if he and everything he knows is just a figment of this person's imagination. And on a third level, it's a nonfictional reflection upon the real truth--that Sisko really is just a fictional dream, created by the DS9 writers at Paramount Pictures. There's something strangely bittersweet about that last sentiment. This is a story that wants to keep dreams alive.

Next week: Looks kinda silly. Two words: Runabout shrinkage.

Previous episode: Who Mourns for Morn?
Next episode: One Little Ship

14 comments on this review
Stef - September 10, 2007 - 04:01 am (USA Central Time)
I am surprised you've rated this episode so highly. I felt it was far to heavy handed and black and white (no pun intended). The episode essentially cried "Black=Good, White=Bad". Even Armin's character as the only non-racist white, while defending Sisko, almost treated blacks as children in his arguments. Almost as if Sisko wasn't in the room.

Sisko came across as a hypocrite at the beginning, when Visitor's character is told not to show up along with Sisko, the office rushes to defend Sisko and sweeps Visitor under the carpet. After all, she is only a woman.

Dukat & Weyoun as the comic-book bad cops put in their worst performances in the entire season, mostly due to the heavy handed approach and OTT script.

If the writers had been a little more subtle, the show could have been great, but for me the only redeaming aspect was Dorn's character saying that even though he had made the big leagues, he still wasn't accepted. That was the most believable thing about the episode.

And the ultimate irony of the show is, Sisko is forced to rewrite his story so it was all a dream. And what happens at the end of the episode? Oh, it was all a dream and , just like we used to write at school when we were 7 and knew no better.
indijo - November 21, 2007 - 09:01 am (USA Central Time)
Be fair, Stef, the problem went much further than a simple picture in the publication. I doubt that many white women were being harassed by cops simply for the color of their skin or gunned down for shop-lifting in that era.

Besides, if a woman writer wanted to make her self known, there were other ways to do it, and if she did so, I doubt she would have lost her job for it.

I agree with Jamahl, this episode was excellent, one of the very best in the series.
AeC - April 3, 2008 - 12:18 am (USA Central Time)
I can't believe it's been ten years since this aired. I remember upon first seeing the preview, my reaction was not dissimilar to Stef's: Trek to that point had always worked by way of allegory, yet here it looked as though it was going to remove all subtlety and give us a brick-to-the-head hour of didacticism that basically said, "Racism bad!"

I was overjoyed to find that I was wrong. True, it took away the allegorical element, but put in its place a nuanced, lyrical story. Several elements of racism were put on display, from the two detectives' overt menacing of Benny to Douglas' subtler attitude of, "It's not me; it's just what IS." I've seen both subtle and gross expressions of racism, both personal and institutional, and it felt right for each to be depicted, even if the cops' came up short characterization-wise as a result.

I don't know that I can add much that hasn't already been said here and elsewhere. I will say that I was surprised that in all the reviews I read, no one brought up what for me was one of the biggest belly laughs of the episode, namely, Herb's being accused of being a Communist. Sure, it was an illustration of the attitude of the times, but, given that other character Armin Shimerman plays on the show, it was also a hilarious bit of meta-irony.
Rogue09 - May 5, 2008 - 01:05 am (USA Central Time)
I'm surprised anyone could like this episode. I'm not one to support racism, but it seems to me dwelling on the topic is as bad as supporting it. But my biggest problem with this episode had nothing to do with its racist implications. It was boring. It took a facinating concept, swept it out the door for no reason, and gave us an hour of "what the hell is going on now?". This has nothing to do with the main storyline, and did nothing but give trite dialouge and a sicophantic plot. It's all a dream! Whooo! Add to that Avery Brooks bad and over the top acting performance of a man who's losing his mind, and you come out with one of the worst episodes of the sixth season.
Occuprice - June 20, 2008 - 05:57 pm (USA Central Time)
Far Beyond The Stars is a Trekkian Classic. Even outside Trek it is stellar science fiction.

Everything else to be said is in Jammer's review.
matt - June 21, 2008 - 12:09 pm (USA Central Time)
I love this episode.
Jhoh - October 27, 2008 - 10:29 am (USA Central Time)
I think this was a great episode and powerful, and it actually ties in not only with Trek but with future episodes. It really makes the 50s look bad understandably, and reinforces how much better things are not only now but in the Star Trek universe.

The only downside for me is that since ethnicity shouldn't be an issue in the Star Trek future, they're basically making it an issue. I sort of liked it when Sisko didn't have to be defined as a black man in the future. It is a concern that is supposed to be dated at that time, and only applies to us in the present. I know that's really why this episode exists and that's fine with me, but at the same time I think that within Star Trek itself it didn't much need a reason to exist.
Brendan - June 14, 2009 - 01:35 pm (USA Central Time)
Despite a few small problems, the sheer creative brilliance and audacity of this episode, combined with the message and the cool things like seeing the cast in different roles, makes this one of the best episodes of Star Trek ever made, I think.
Brian - July 29, 2009 - 05:56 pm (USA Central Time)
It was an ok episode for me. I have to dock marks from any episode that allows Brooks to put his hyper-ventilating into 5th gear.
Jay - September 4, 2009 - 11:00 pm (USA Central Time)
I'm with Brian...I'm not a fan of Avery when he gets into full scenery-chewing mode.
Kyle - September 22, 2009 - 02:02 am (USA Central Time)
I have very mixed feelings about this episode.

On one hand we have some great stuff with the interaction between Bennie and Douglas (the "it's just what it IS" line was very well conceived) and seeing the Trek regulars in different roles minus the makeup is good fun. The self-reflexive nature of the story and its commentary on the liberating power of the Sci-Fi thought experiment was also well done.

On the other hand, Brooks' delivery seemed really weak in this episode, especially the breakdown, only made worse by the full on close-up shot that was used to capture it. I also felt like the setup for this plot (Sisko doubting his capacity to fight, his father coming to visit) didn't really match the main plot very well, and felt like it could have gone in other interesting directions.

There are a lot of DS9 episodes that are just mediocre, this isn't one of them, being both a success and a failure at the same time.

At least they shot for the stars...
Destructor - October 11, 2009 - 07:03 pm (USA Central Time)
I loved everything about this episode.
Wilbur - November 1, 2009 - 05:33 am (USA Central Time)
Hundreds of years ago (as far as I can tell), my ancestors were serfs working for some baron in Southern Germany. Any of them could have been beaten to death for talking back to a baron. All of them, I'm sure, faced daily injustices. And when they went to sleep at night on their beds of straw, they dreamed of a world where they would be treated as human beings. I live a life of extraordinary comfort and freedom. When I feel like giving up, I have to remember that my life is a fulfillment of their dream. I have a responsibility to honor that dream, just like Captain Sisko has a responsibility to fulfill the vision of Bennie Russell.

It hardly matters that Captain Sisko isn't real. The dream itself is real, and everything good that we've accomplished as a species is a result of that dream.
Alexander - November 25, 2009 - 10:42 am (USA Central Time)
Good review, for an excellent episode. One of the most ambitious, relevant and overall excellent episodes Trek has produced. Has to be in the top five of DS9 episodes ever.

Rogue: "I'm surprised anyone could like this episode. I'm not one to support racism, but it seems to me dwelling on the topic is as bad as supporting it"
Heavily disagree. Awareness of the process by which a large segment of humanity has, in the past and present, been brutalized, exploited, marginalized and killed is a vital process to combat ongoing injustices and work towards a more egalitarian society. Frankly, my mind boggles at the concept that recalling these incidents and the long structures of domination is as bad as the structures themselves. But in a way, thanks for voicing this, as it makes explicit what a lot of our culture implicitly believes. 'Things were bad in the past, let's not think about it, it's all fixed now, no need to upset people.' Wrong. A society that can't look at and value lives that struggled against such extreme prejudice is a society that's still profoundly broken. This is doubly the case when so much of the circumstances of this episode as still sadly relevant. Yes, even after Obama's election. Police pressure, from suspicion of 'driving while black' to disproportionate use of force are still a reality. To a large extent people are still more comfortable with a white scifi author or actor than a black one. Most of the speculations on the future take a basically "neutral" and white privileged standpoint. Bottom line, we still have a long way to go before we reach the 24th century, not just chronologically or technologically, but in social attitudes. Episodes like 'Far Beyond the Stars' can help move us there. So can shows like The Wire, but I digress.
Name:
E-mail:
43 + 4 = (Prove you're not a bot)
Notify me about new comments on this page
Hide my e-mail on my post
Comment:
Comments powered by Scriptsmill Comments Script