Star Trek: Voyager

Seventh Season Recap

For episodes airing from 10/4/2000 to 5/23/2001
Series created by Rick Berman & Michael Piller & Jeri Taylor
Executive producers: Rick Berman & Kenneth Biller

Review by Jamahl Epsicokhan

In brief: A competent job of doing primarily Voyager business as usual, featuring an ending that goes out more with a routine whimper than a risky bang.

And, one last time, here it is in annual summer-tradition style — the Voyager season roundup, rehash, and all-around recap-and-commentary article. It's the most comprehensive overall look at Voyager I'll make this year, and the last official Jammer Review for Voyager I'll probably ever be posting. How did season seven fare? What was done well? What was FUBAR? Read on to find out. As usual, part one has a short review of each episode; part two has the general commentary on the Big Picture. Fasten your seat belts, because this jet is taking off...

Part 1: Capsule Reviews

To see the rankings and 10-scale ratings for this season's episodes, click here.

Unimatrix Zero, Part IIAir date: 10/4/2000. Teleplay by Brannon Braga & Joe Menosky. Story by Mike Sussman and Brannon Braga & Joe Menosky. Directed by Mike Vejar.

Much like the final episode, the season's premiere is a good example of the Voyager legacy — beautifully produced action-adventure TV without the logic, freshness, or character insight to make a true lasting impact. There are so many plot absurdities here they're hard to count, the most egregious being the way the crew go undercover to be willfully assimilated/mutilated by the Borg, something that's dismissed outright in comic-book terms. Meanwhile, the Borg have basically been reduced to routine street thugs, featuring a Queen who serves no purpose beyond that of a narrative tool, and a network with worse security than Windows 95. The most interesting aspect of the episode — that of a civil war that will "change the Borg forever" — is rendered obsolete by the lack of any consequences as demonstrated in "Endgame," so I'm not so sure what we're supposed to take from the BS-laden "Unimatrix Zero" other than another hour of impressive production design and admittedly well-staged action.

Rating: 2.5 stars

ImperfectionAir date: 10/11/2000. Teleplay by Carleton Eastlake and Robert Doherty. Story by Andre Bormanis. Directed by David Livingston.

A key component in Seven's brain begins shutting down, and the result is a sincere and well-acted terminal illness allegory. Yes, Seven's Quest For Humanity is pretty much a Voyager cliché by this point, but there's a good reason the writers keep going back to it, which is that these stories are relatable to real life. The performances are good — particularly a notably understated turn by Manu Intiraymi as Icheb — and so is the dialog, including a scene where Seven and Icheb discuss dependence vs. independence, and another where Seven and Torres discuss the possibility of an afterlife. The encounter with Hard-Headed Aliens and the resulting chase through the junkyard is yet another gratuitous Voyager Action Insert, but so it goes.

Rating: 3 stars

Drive Air date: 10/18/2000. Written by Michael Taylor. Directed by Winrich Kolbe.

It's the first in what would be a season-long family arc for Torres and Paris, one that I personally found quite gratifying. After years of virtually ignoring the relationship, the writers decide to finally tackle this couple head-on and put them at the most crucial juncture of their relationship to date. The result is a marriage that would be aptly revisited several times later in the season. Larger consequences aside, "Drive" is almost too by-the-numbers, with a thin and predictable subplot about the attempted sabotage of a peacekeeping racing event. Harry Kim figures into this subplot in a way that only reinforces how much of a gullible goof he is, as if the writers are underlining his chumpiness intentionally.

Rating: 2.5 stars

RepressionAir date: 10/25/2000. Teleplay by Mark Haskell Smith. Story by Kenneth Biller. Directed by Winrich Kolbe.

In one of the most woefully contrived and pointless plot exercises in recent memory, Tuvok becomes the instrument of a Maquis mutiny orchestrated from the Alpha Quadrant, for crying out loud. It begins as a halfway plausible Tuvokian investigation, but then quickly degenerates into a ridiculous mess that wants to pretend the writers actually care about the Maquis storyline, long ago abandoned. Teero, the Bajoran guy pulling the strings from afar, has absolutely no useful or believable motive to instigate a mutiny on Voyager. None. The fact that Tuvok could be mind programmed seven years earlier to be Teero's unwitting pawn is way beyond implausible. The Vulcan mind meld is used here in spectacularly absurd ways, to essentially reprogram former-Maquis crew members to "help them remember" where their loyalties lie. Do I even have to mention that all of this is resolved in the magically inane final five minutes with absolutely zero consequences whatsoever? Ugh.

Rating: 1.5 stars

Critical CareAir date: 11/1/2000. Teleplay by James Kahn. Story by Kenneth Biller & Robert Doherty. Directed by Terry Windell.

In another of the Voyager writers' somewhat rare attempts to tackle a social issue, the Doctor is kidnapped to an alien hospital that uses twisted ethics and prioritizing for determining the treatment of its patients. A good but not great social commentary, "Critical Care" does a good job showing the bureaucratic absurdity of HMO-type organizations, and has an ice-cold pragmatic system that places value on life in terms of an individual's overall perceived worth to society. The episode has a lot of good individual moments and points, although the ending seems somewhat unsatisfying and uninformative, reducing the whole problem of a society down to the hospital administrator, who is put through the somewhat obvious irony of becoming a patient in his own hospital. Though an overall solid effort, the story doesn't tackle with much insight the issue of whether the larger problems presented here are or aren't fixable.

Rating: 3 stars

Inside ManAir date: 11/8/2000. Written by Robert Doherty. Directed by Allan Kroeker.

After our visits to the Alpha Quadrant twice last season in "Pathfinder" and "Life Line," both with excellent results, this third outing with Barclay & Co. is a major disappointment of wasted potential and uninspired storytelling. The episode boils down to a Ferengi plot to use the Pathfinder array to trick Voyager into venturing through a spatial anomaly so the Ferengi can get their hands on Seven's nanoprobes and sell them for huge profit. Yes. The use of Barclay this time around is, at best, a rehash of certain issues in "Pathfinder," and, at worst, the writers making fun of him instead of sympathizing with him. Meanwhile, we've got the whole issue of the Voyager crew being manipulated into thinking they've got a safe shortcut to the Alpha Quadrant, which is a bad story device because (1) it's already been used too many times, and (2) it succeeds only in making our characters look foolish. (You'd think after "Hope and Fear" the crew would know better.) No, thanks.

Rating: 2 stars

Body and SoulAir date: 11/15/2000. Teleplay by Eric Morris and Phyllis Strong & Mike Sussman. Story by Michael Taylor. Directed by Robert Duncan McNeill.

Silly high-concept done entertainingly, in which Jeri Ryan must play Seven under the influence of Doc's program. Light and inconsequential, the episode basically boils down to whether we're amused by Ryan's gleefully over-the-top performance as Doc in a human body. Well, I was amused. I was also impressed by the more subtle nuances within the otherwise unsubtle Ryan performance — which, by the way, is exactly right since the Doctor's outgoing expressiveness all but requires that he would be anything but subtle about his experiences here. Aside from some "hologram rights" thematic backdrop for "Flesh and Blood," the plot is basically insignificant filler that lets Ryan take Doc's role and run with it. A successful example of a show that puts all its eggs in one high-concept's basket.

Rating: 3 stars

NightingaleAir date: 11/22/2000. Teleplay by Andre Bormanis. Story by Robert Lederman & Dave Long. Directed by LeVar Burton.

Harry Kim as a captain? Say it ain't so. The problem here is that the episode tries to pass Harry off as someone we should respect when he does nothing to earn our respect. He exudes an annoying air of arrogance that's self-defeating, he micromanages needlessly, and it takes Seven kicking him in the ass before he shapes up. Sorry, but respect must be earned. "Nightingale" is perfect evidence of one of this series' biggest failures: the inability for it to develop its supporting characters (especially Harry) in gradual, believable ways. By throwing us such ham-fisted Harry actions, the story doesn't really give us a sampling of Harry's abilities but instead examples of why he shouldn't even be in the captain's chair in the first place. I've long been annoyed with the lack of Harry's development, and this pedestrian last-ditch attempt to provide him with a new challenge only punctuates the lost cause. I'm not sure what's more at fault here — the episode or the series at large.

Rating: 2 stars

Flesh and BloodAir date: 11/29/2000. Part I: Teleplay by Bryan Fuller. Story by Jack Monaco and Bryan Fuller & Raf Green. Directed by Mike Vejar. Part II: Teleplay by Raf Green & Kenneth Biller. Story by Bryan Fuller & Raf Green. Directed by David Livingston.

Though not as centrally important, one question on the mind of "Flesh and Blood" is similar to one at the heart of Steven Spielberg's A.I. released earlier this summer — what sort of human responsibilities do we have toward artificially intelligent beings that we create? That's a tough question, because it's hard to define "sentience" in the terms of extremely elaborate programming. The cans of worms are abundant, but I'm heartened by the fact that this year the writers try to deal with them (here and in "Author, Author") rather than sweeping such questions under the rug in favor of holodeck tomfoolery (see last year's "Fair Haven"/"Spirit Folk" travesty). My solution: Don't create artificial sentient-like beings if you're not prepared to deal with the ethical consequences (although the Hirogen get around that by maintaining that there's simply not an issue here, which is a valid position of its own). All that said, "Flesh and Blood" uses some of these issues as a backdrop for a Voyager action movie with a lot to recommend. The Doctor's willingness to be drawn into this plight is both understandable and commendable, and Picardo puts in a typically good performance. Many of the guest players are pretty good, too. Probably the most subtly interesting aspect of the story is the way Iden, the holographic terrorist leader, cannot overcome his programmed predisposition for violence, whereas Kejal, the holographic Cardassian engineer, is able to grow beyond those programmed instincts. While I'm not so sure I agree with all of the messages that "Flesh and Blood" puts forward, its ability to spark some entertaining sci-fi debate makes it worthwhile.

Rating: 3.5 stars

ShatteredAir date: 1/17/2001. Teleplay by Michael Taylor. Story by Mike Sussman & Michael Taylor. Directed by Terry Windell.

This year's Anomalous Time Plot, in which Voyager is shattered into various timeline pieces and only Chakotay might be able to put the ship back the way it should be. The plot, like most time-manipulating episodes, makes no sense — which is to be expected — but what's peculiar here is how mundane, repetitive, and talky the story allows itself to get, using so many unnecessary alternate-timeline versions of various characters and a slew of references to old episodes for no good reason ... unless we're supposed to be playing Name That Episode from our living rooms. Chakotay's ongoing interaction with a Janeway from the past is a saving grace of sorts, but the episode doesn't take full advantage of the idea and needlessly spends time watching Chakotay interact with Seska and engage in repetitive scenes where he must explain to other characters what's going on ... and then later explain some more. It's not terribly unpleasant, but it's certainly not interesting. The Humpty Dumpty of time-travel shows.

Rating: 2 stars

LineageAir date: 1/24/2001. Written by James Kahn. Directed by Peter Lauritson.

Quiet-ish and with smaller human problems instead of bigger galactic ones, "Lineage" is not your typical Voyager action outing. It is, rather, a well-executed character drama that focuses on relevant relationship issues. I'll grant that not all viewers tune in to Voyager for this, but every once in a while you need to explore the characters with genuine focus without resorting to needless plotting. That's exactly what "Lineage" does, by diving into B'Elanna's troubled past and tying it into her and Tom's future. The pregnancy, as I've said before, is an apt symbol for these two characters finally becoming something Voyager has been in need of for a long time — the basis for a true, front-and-center nuclear family that is founded in and grows in the Delta Quadrant. B'Elanna's torn-between-cultures identity has rarely been depicted with more clarity and immediacy than here, where she fears the Klingon blood in her and the baby will eventually tear her new family apart, much like it did her childhood family. The episode benefits from rational dialog, good acting, and a straightforwardness that avoids the temptation of obvious plot distractions or contrivances. The show succumbs to excessive melodrama at the end, but remains a moving character outing nonetheless.

Rating: 3.5 stars

RepentanceAir date: 1/31/2001. Teleplay by Robert Doherty. Story by Mike Sussman & Robert Doherty. Directed by Mike Vejar.

It's the death penalty issue, done with a certain degree of thoughtfulness and a significantly lesser degree of subtlety (which is to say not much). It's the classic "contemporary issue with a sci-fi twist" treatment, which is accomplished here through Seven's nanoprobes (groan), which give the contemptible convict Iko a conscience where he never had one before. Arguments of responsibility are both explicit and implicit as Iko undergoes a stunning transformation. Most clearly shown here is how the death penalty is rooted more in emotional responses than logical ones, which is perhaps why society at large should not be carrying it out (completely aside from all the flaws in a system that claims to be just and impartial but cannot presume to make such claims). "Repentance" has numerous flaws (certain arguments exist in a fantasy world where the usefulness of the message is skewed by sci-fi convenience), but in the final analysis the episode is actually about something, which is part of what makes Trek what it is.

Rating: 3 stars

ProphecyAir date: 2/7/2001. Teleplay by Mike Sussman & Phyllis Strong. Story by Larry Nemecek & J. Kelley Burke and Raf Green & Kenneth Biller. Directed by Terry Windell.

Don't forget your Klingon decoder ring. Not that you'd need it, since the hollowly concocted prophesying in this episode allows for the widest of interpretations in order to hold Torres' baby up as a Klingon messiah. (With a little more effort, perhaps Janeway could've been recognized as the Kuva'Mach, even without being Klingon or pregnant. Okay, maybe not.) This episode is simply a mess, featuring a score of disjointed clichés from the Delta and Alpha quadrants alike. There's no discipline here, and I'm convinced the episode came together by jamming together at least two independent story ideas. Or twelve. The final two acts in particular cause viewer whiplash, jumping aimlessly and implausibly from an honorable Klingon swordfight to a deadly plague to a Voyager takeover with the usual lousy-shot bad guys. In trying to do everything, it ends up doing very little. The emotional core is largely absent.

Rating: 2 stars

The VoidAir date: 2/14/2001. Teleplay by Raf Green & James Kahn. Story by Raf Green & Kenneth Biller. Directed by Mike Vejar.

In the season's most unintentionally ironic episode, the writers decide to create a premise that represents just about everything Voyager as a series probably could have (and should have) represented from day one. They do this by pulling the ship into a starless void with no resources, where trapped ships pummel and steal from each other for survival. Well, this of course is what the Delta Quadrant itself could've been about (albeit to a lesser extent). To stack an irony atop another irony, history repeats itself when Janeway decides that sticking to Starfleet ideals is what will help Voyager create alliances making an escape possible. That was a troublesome and naive turning point for the series back in second season's "Alliances," where the situation was very different (and less tuned for such Starfleet-esque thinking), but here it makes sense because being the friendly one is a viable way to get attention. Indeed, given the situation, it's the only viable option for escape. While I find it pretty silly that no one aside from our gallant crew had the sense to think of any of this before (cooperation — what a novel concept!), it does a good job showing the classic Trek ideal in action.

Rating: 3 stars

Workforce, Part I — Airdate: 2/21/2001. Written by Kenneth Biller & Bryan Fuller. Directed by Allan Kroeker.

"Workforce" is very simply a good and well-executed sci-fi adventure concept. It's fresh and mysterious, dropping our characters into strange situations and making us witnesses to a gradually evolving mystery. The construction of that mystery is revealed at just the right pace; we know something is askew even as the characters themselves — whose memories have been tampered with — do not. Outstanding production values do a fine job of creating the active-but-arid essence of this highly industrialized world through the use of well-placed special effects, convincing set design, and good editing. Also commendable is the apt use of our reprogrammed characters, who retain many of their own personality traits. Seven is most appropriate as an "efficiency monitor," and Janeway's emerging relationship with a coworker hints at the simple pleasures that seem to be lacking in her life as a captain. And there's a subtle, effective message behind the plot, where this society is almost insidious in its devotion to employment, in a Borg drone sort of way.

Rating: 3.5 stars

Workforce, Part IIAir date: 2/28/2001. Teleplay by Kenneth Biller & Michael Taylor. Story by Kenneth Biller & Bryan Fuller. Directed by Roxann Dawson.

Taking part one to its inevitable conclusion, part two is highly efficient plot maneuvering (with a lot of it, expertly paced), its wisest choice being that it gives us a guest character who is on "our" side in trying to uncover the conspiracy. Even when bureaucracy renders him powerless, he's not an idiot. Meanwhile, the best character angle in play is the sweet interaction between Paris and Torres, who are unaware that they are, in fact, married in their actual lives. Paris feels a need to protect Torres even while being completely unaware of their marriage on a conscious level, which is reassuring. Other plot aspects, like Chakotay trying to get through to Janeway, are effective but less memorable. The ending falls short of satisfaction by being too cut-and-dried and by too simply brushing aside the issues of the memory alteration. Also lost in the shuffle is part one's eerie message of drone-like workforce existence.

Rating: 3 stars

Human ErrorAir date: 3/7/2001. Teleplay by Brannon Braga & Andre Bormanis. Story by Andre Bormanis & Kenneth Biller. Directed by Allan Kroeker.

It's not the worst episode of the year, but it's certainly the biggest disappointment. Parts of this story are so engrossing, so intriguing, so well-realized that we want the writers to see the story through to its logical conclusion — one that would make Seven realize she's not quite who she thought she was. Nope: She's a Borg drone with a built-in emotion inhibitor that doubles as the show's plot-resetting device. "Human Error" is the epitome of pointless Voyager status-quo mandates and the type of repeating time loops many characters seem trapped inside as a result. Once again Seven has a chance to grow and doesn't. Once again the audience is cheated with an incredulous plot contrivance pulled from thin air. Even though "Endgame" would have Seven change her mind and undergo the procedure Doc proposes here, it's too late by then because few results of any interest play out on the screen. The ending of this episode, even given the "Endgame" development, is still utterly inexplicable and gutless — perhaps even more so. I'm left to wonder whether pairing Chakotay and Seven in the finale was done only because Robert Beltran challenged Brannon Braga to do it.

Rating: 2 stars

Q2Air date: 4/11/2001. Teleplay by Robert Doherty. Story by Kenneth Biller. Directed by LeVar Burton.

I forgot to mention in my original review of "Q2" that the teenage Q premise wasn't even original — it was done in TNG's sixth-season episode, "True Q." And it was done there much better, I assure you. Here, being a Q is reduced to the dumbest variety of sophomoric parlor tricks, where Q Jr. decides omnipotence is handy for throwing a party in engineering or making all of Seven's clothes vanish. Yippee. Little of this story is funny, and even less of it is thoughtful; the show's biggest miscalculation is that it thinks our characters should be teaching the mighty Q silly human lessons like the importance of the nuclear family or owning up to responsibility. If I wanted that, I'd watch an after-school special. The Q are supposed to be teaching us. The ending borders on nonsensical, with a trial unconvincingly thrown in as if somewhere along the line a rule was written saying the Q Bench must always show up to physically sit in judgment of somebody. This, along with "Repression," sinks to the bottom of the seventh-season barrel.

Rating: 1.5 stars

Author, AuthorAir date: 4/18/2001. Teleplay by Phyllis Strong & Mike Sussman. Story by Brannon Braga. Directed by David Livingston.

The last great episode of Voyager, in which wit and insight play a key role in a story about Doc writing a holographic novel that becomes the center of controversy over the similarities (and noted differences) the fictionalization has when compared to the Voyager crew. It's a brilliant premise that plays like the best elements of "Worst Case Scenario," "Living Witness," and the various "hologram rights" shows, and would've been the ideal sendoff starring vehicle for Doc (if not for the needless "Renaissance Man"). Sharp dialog and attention to the nature of the characters makes for an engaging dissection of personalities and attitudes. The comic high point comes when Paris decides to give Doc a taste of his own medicine by reprogramming the holo-novel; the jokes and performances are inspired. The episode turns into a "rights of the artificial" courtroom-like premise when Doc learns that he has no rights as an author because he's a hologram — which is savagely ironic given the subject of his holo-novel. The subplots involving other characters having scheduled chats with family members prove to be surprisingly enlightening and perfect to fill the time in between Doc's scenes. The ending strikes me as sane: Doc's status as an author cannot be ignored, but nor is Starfleet quick to grant all holograms the legal status of people.

Rating: 4 stars

Friendship OneAir date: 4/25/2001. Written by Michael Taylor & Bryan Fuller. Directed by Mike Vejar.

A middling affair which serves as this year's attempt to be "One Small Step," except without the genuine sense of reverence for space exploration. There's an over-reliance on clichés here, particularly in the hostage standoff between Janeway and the "bad guys," who are supposed to be sympathetic but whose motivation as written is suspect, to say the least. The alien leader is written with little subtlety or willingness to hear reason, while other members of the alien race are reasonable. Poor Joe Carey meets his long-deferred demise in what proves to be an arbitrary hostage killing with zero emotional payoff whatsoever. How cynical. The show's overall message is okay: Consequences Can Come Unexpectedly. But then unfortunately Janeway's final line about how exploration shouldn't cost any lives is among the most ill-thought-out lines of dialog ever written on this series.

Rating: 2.5 stars

Natural LawAir date: 5/2/2001. Teleplay by James Kahn. Story by Kenneth Biller & James Kahn. Directed by Terry Windell.

The year's most uneventful episode, in which Chakotay and Seven engage in — not sexual escapades — but the most reliable of all Voyager clichés: the Shuttle Crash. They then find themselves trapped in an alien cultural preserve with a primitive people, and the episode spends a lot of time watching Chakotay's attempts to communicate with them. It's not annoying, but it's certainly not compelling. Meanwhile, Janeway & Co. attempt to negotiate with some aliens, who finally of course open fire on Voyager, etc. The B-story about Paris going to traffic school is a waste of bandwidth. To say this episode bides its time is putting it mildly. By the time we get to the "issue" there's no time to flesh it out. It's perhaps worth noting that it's hard to step wrong when you don't attempt to do much of anything at all. Wake me up when we get there...

Rating: 2 stars

HomesteadAir date: 5/9/2001. Written by Raf Green. Directed by LeVar Burton.

Neelix meets a colony of Talaxians (how did they get out here?) and through a series of events finds that he has a chance to offer his talents as an all-around good person and build a new life with them. While the alien miners here aren't exactly villains from the Cinema School of Kitten-Drowning Manipulation, they aren't exactly subtle either, as they threaten a young boy and intend to blow up the Talaxians' home in the interests of making a few bucks. Neelix & Co. step in to help the Talaxians save themselves. "Homestead" is not great or remotely groundbreaking, but it sends Neelix off with a palatable dose of dignity. Neelix's silent departure and Tuvok's farewell gesture turn out to be surprisingly affecting.

Rating: 3 stars

Renaissance ManAir date: 5/16/2001. Teleplay by Phyllis Strong & Mike Sussman. Story by Andrew Shepard Price & Mark Gaberman. Directed by Mike Vejar.

A mostly needless exercise in Doc redundancy where our multitalented Holodoc must pretend to be various members of the crew in order to complete a secret mission (stealing the warp core) for aliens who hold the captain hostage. Yes, another hostage plot. The kidnapping and operation-in-secret premise is a flimsy excuse for the undercover work — pretty much the way these things usually go — but the plot manages to move along at a good clip, offering up enough gags to be fun without falling into too much tedium. Still, in a season where many of the characters are devoid of any sort of reasonable development, do we really need another average action/adventure plot? The two kidnappers seem frankly incapable of being the threat they claim to be to the captain, particularly since one of them eventually helps Doc turn the tables on the other. Oh well — any episode that features Janeway talking to voices in her head is at least worth a look.

Rating: 2.5 stars

EndgameAir date: 5/23/2001. Teleplay by Kenneth Biller & Robert Doherty. Story by Rick Berman & Kenneth Biller & Brannon Braga. Directed by Allan Kroeker.

The series finale is the typically watchable Voyager "event," complete with Big Budget and Big FX; more Borg; Paradoxical Time Travel; a Will-They-Get-Home Premise; and an ending with lots of 'splosions and inevitably hollow comeuppance. There are things that are impressive and rare, like the awesome sight of a Borg transwarp hub. The future timeline is established with a reasonable amount of care and interest. Does it all add up to anything? Yes and no. Yes, there are some good ideas in here, like Janeway in conflict with a time-displaced version of herself, and her struggle over whether to take the way home that sits in front of her or to help strangers (a la "Caretaker"). No, in that the whole premise has a time-paradox loophole that negates the dramatic power and indeed the very need for Janeway's difficult decisions, allowing everybody to have their cake and eat it too (most notably the writers). In the meantime, the Borg are a joke, their Queen is an even bigger joke, and the (non)aftermath once Voyager arrives in the Alpha Quadrant doesn't begin to scratch the surface of any of the real issues that were interesting about the crew returning home in the first place. Entertaining? Well-made? Yes. Satisfying? Well-envisioned? No.

Rating: 2.5 stars

Part 2: Season Analysis

Like in previous years, I might as well start this thing out by quoting myself.

One year ago, in my season six recap, I wrote:

"Since Voyager is in fact heading into its last season and the creators know this, they might be motivated to deal intelligently with the issue of Voyager returning to the Alpha Quadrant. Touches like Admiral Hayes' curiosity about the Maquis in 'Life Line' give me a glimmer of hope for a season that, if not for the expectation of Voyager returning home, I would write off as doomed by precedent to become 'Season Four, Part IV.' We may have given up on the Delta Quadrant, but there's still quite a bit of potential here in going back to the Alpha Quadrant. Voyager's track record doesn't have me enthused, but hope springs eternal."

Disappointingly, all I can report is that getting home was scarcely a factor beyond the two-hour finale for the series. And in "Endgame," getting home was the only part of the issue. Being home meant nothing, because zero screen time was devoted to the idea. In the Alpha Quadrant, Voyager emerges from a Borg sphere after being inside it and blowing it up (how does that work?); Janeway says, "We did it"; roll credits, end of series.

Gee, thanks for all the wonderful insights on the matter.

Not that it comes as a huge surprise.

Call it "Season Four, Part IV," I guess.

A year ago I would've called this the worst possible scenario for dealing with the issue of Voyager returning to the Alpha Quadrant. I probably should've just called it the most likely scenario. As season seven roared on and the news and spoilers rolled out onto the Web and into magazines, it became increasingly obvious that Voyager getting home was going to be held for the final episode and, indeed, the final minutes of the final episode. At a certain point it probably just becomes too late or inconvenient to deal with larger issues. The audience expects the series to end on a climactic bang, and if getting home wasn't that bang, what could it be?

It really isn't surprising that the Voyager creators didn't plan out a second dramatic bang so that we could get the ship home earlier in the season and deal with those questions that were the most tantalizing. I'm frankly not appalled that the series ended without any insight, because I really wasn't expecting any. If nothing else, Voyager is consistent. The series is television at its most basic, existing to fill screen time, sell advertising, and entertain viewers. All very necessary things, mind you, and things Voyager probably did adequately. But what's missing is the series' ability to take it one step further — to challenge the audience with new ideas, to challenge the characters with fresh problems and perspectives. Now that it's over, I think I finally know what Voyager the series is. It's a stage, pure and simple, for telling Trek stories in the most traditional and safest of confines. It's not a series about new perspectives, original ideas, or challenge. It's not a series that usually stops to ask tough questions. It's a series run by those who, for whatever reason, believe that growth and challenging expectations are asking too much of the audience ... creators who believe an audience will not stand for something different in their Trek. Who knows — maybe they're right.

Of course, this all goes back to my long-held stance on the series, which is that it has forever ignored its own premise and promise. You know the drill, because I've said the same thing every year for what seems like, well, forever. (Do not fret; this year's rehash will be brief.) From the standpoint of a Broader Perspective, Voyager might as well be the Time Loop Trek Series. The characters are mostly stuck in time, destined to forever repeat their overall experience without growing or changing. Even when hypothetically stuck for 30 more years on a starship, it's hard to imagine, based on the evidence we've seen, that many of the characters are or would be different from who they were when the journey started in "Caretaker." Janeway has her Starfleet ideals (which she either observes or discards when convenient), and "Endgame" proposes that an additional 16 years in the Delta Quadrant would turn Janeway into a bitter cynic. But why should we believe that? Seven years hasn't changed Janeway much at all, and in essence she's already gone through most everything her future self probably could; she's already lost at least one or two dozen crew members. It's only when she hypothetically loses Seven of Nine that she becomes more hardened and less idealistic. Unfortunately, that's not a statement about Voyager as a family; that's a statement about Janeway's personal relationship with one individual ... not to mention that it's all hypothetical anyway. BFD.

The same problems that have plagued this series in past years were still evident in season seven. Look no further than Harry Kim, the series' most egregious symbol of the series' biggest problem. Here's a guy who was straight out of the academy, who got conned by Quark in the very first episode, and who had a lot to learn. Who is he today? Practically the same damn guy, making what looks like freshman mistakes, laughable when he tries to play captain, intentionally held up as the writers' eternal chump of the series in episode after episode, like some sort of cosmic joke. Why hasn't this guy grown up over the past seven years? The reason: Because Voyager in its broad strokes would rather be about static archetypes than evolving characters. Janeway is the Leader, Seven and Doc are Human Proteges, Tuvok is the Vulcan, Harry is the Court Jester, Neelix is the Kind Soul, etc. Many of these people haven't changed much at all, because they're icon types instead of people.

Granted, some have changed. Doc and Seven have always been on a continuing journey of learning about humanity. Seven never quite went as far as I'd hoped, thanks to cowardly, non-committal reset-button plots like "Human Error" (and she seemed stuck in that time loop, repeating lessons rather than learning from them) — but she at least had the mission. Doc might be the best character on the show. He was a clean slate when first activated in "Caretaker," and now he's a man with passions and hobbies, opinions and personality, and has even taken up a cause for his fellow holograms. His cause grew out of a thematic concept this season that I never thought could've worked as well as it did. After years of stupid holodeck hijinks, the Voyager writers finally managed to take a holodeck idea and make something interesting by asking if Doc would take a stand on holograms being exploited (see the standouts "Flesh and Blood" and "Author, Author"). Yes, it represents a massive can of worms and debatable arguments that can be shot down, but it still makes for interesting storytelling.

This year also spent some time finally addressing Paris and Torres' relationship, which was quite frankly way overdue. A lot of people scoff at Paris/Torres (including former executive producer Brannon "Voyager is not a relationship series" Braga), but I think their presence is important in demonstrating what may be the only recognizable bigger theme this series has left — that of a developing family aboard a starship whose crew is out of touch with their families back in the Alpha Quadrant. When you have a crew stuck on a starship for what could be a bulk of their lives, you can't just pretend that life consists of reporting for duty every morning and talking about shields and transporters. There has to be a sensibility away from the Starfleet life that says these people are going to be human beings with life goals apart from their jobs. That has often been an important ingredient lacking on this series (because no one truly believes they're stuck on this ship, or if they do they're fine with it). But this season's willingness to explore Torres/Paris is a saving grace that should not be underestimated.

To those who say Trek should just be a stage for a starship and a crew that "boldly go," I pose the question: Then why bother having a fresh and extreme premise? Why pretend that getting home is important or that resources are limited? Why not just send these people off on a deep-space mission and be done with it? (In short, Voyager writers: You made your bed; now lie in it.) I will admit that I've had my own biases and hopes for what Voyager as a series could've been, but if they're giving us a mission statement of sorts (two crews, alone in the unknown, overcoming differences, reevaluating perspectives, living in a survival situation, etc., etc.), they should probably use it to gain some sort of insight into the human condition. But Voyager isn't often an exploration of the human condition; it's more an exploration into the ways the creators can resolve a new (or old) plot, or assemble an action sequence.

At the outset of this season, the big behind-the-scenes change was that Brannon Braga was out (busy working on Enterprise development) and Kenneth Biller was in. Anti-Bragites were ecstatic. I was unmoved. Voyager has long been an unchangeable mass of the Status Quo, a series far more focused on the individual episode to have any sort of sweeping change brought about by a new head writer. Anyone expecting a new Voyager from Biller probably was fooling themselves. We certainly didn't get much that was out of line with what came before.

On the level of the individual story, season seven seemed to be a steady diet of competence. There were fewer big losers this season than in many if not most seasons ("Repression" and "Q2" go down as the biggest losers, yet I didn't feel a need to break out the one-star rating), and at the same time only one episode I'd qualify as truly excellent ("Author, Author"). And, of course, there were a lot of shows falling into the categories of decent, middling, and mediocre, and a few good standouts. Sadly, well less than half the shows fell into the category of something I'd solidly recommend.

On the whole, Voyager served the general purpose of TV for viewers, which is to entertain for an hour at a time, but without taking us to many places of genuine wonder. If I sound a little unenthused by that observation, it's because I am. The freshness just isn't there. After watching the way Deep Space Nine went through a war and challenged the very survival of the Federation — taking its characters to extremely hard places in the process — watching a crew go head-to-head with the Borg again and again (by getting themselves assimilated on purpose, etc., no less) feels like an unconvincing comic book. Where's the originality and conviction in such recycled plotlines?

Biller's biggest contribution to the Bigger Picture (aside from any and all workplace operating styles, irrelevant to this article) seems to be that he was open to the idea of exploring the aforementioned Torres/Paris relationship (especially in the sleeper standout "Lineage") that Braga apparently did not want to touch. That's a good thing, in my view.

Other than that, season seven looked a lot like season six to me, especially in its clueless regard to using supporting characters. Chakotay is still a bland cipher with practically no reason for being, his biggest show being the unarresting time story, "Shattered," and his arbitrary last-minute relationship with Seven seeming more motivated by behind-the-scenes chest-thumping (Robert Beltran basically dared Brannon Braga to do it, and Braga obliged) than anything remotely within the parameters of either character. Tuvok is perhaps the most appallingly overlooked character, an individual who had great potential in the early seasons when he was Janeway's close friend and confidant. Now he gets to star in absurd vehicles like "Repression," where his Super Vulcan Mind Powers are exploited as a way-beyond-ridiculous plot device. Aside from a good line or moment here and there, I'm exceptionally disappointed in how Tuvok turned out; he's just "the Vulcan" instead of a well-rounded character, something he easily could've been. The fact that Tim Russ makes Tuvok the best-performed Vulcan since Leonard Nimoy's original Spock only highlights the lost potential. Meanwhile, Neelix gets a good sendoff in "Homestead" but otherwise has been another character largely without direction or meaning. And don't get me started on Harry "one of the franchise's all-time worst regular characters" Kim; as far as I'm concerned, the less said — or seen — about him, the better. None of this analysis should come as a shock, since I've made these cases before.

So was season seven a success or a failure? I guess that depends what your definition of this series is. As a whole, I certainly can't call it anything close to a success because this season staked out very little new territory, answered almost no questions about what being in the Delta Quadrant or what getting home meant (which was the beyond-obvious gold to be mined this year, but was left untouched), and was content to do what this series has always done best and/or worst: business as usual. I only recommended 11 out of 24 episodes this year, which is hardly an impressive hit-to-miss ratio. Yet I can't call the season (or the series) a complete failure because it often did what it set out to do with great skill, telling individual sci-fi or character stories that stand on their own as reasonable hours of television, and sometimes with enough style or substance to be worthwhile. Unfortunately, when it comes down to it that's not enough, because I think we ultimately want more than middle-of-the-road routine in the broader strokes of our Trek franchise. It's especially disappointing because Voyager had what was arguably the best premise of any Trek series, but squandered it to rehash a formula we've seen played out for years.

And the disappointing stock-issue adventure ending resolves very little of any significance, unless you were just dying to see the Borg get blowed up real good again — which I for one was not. In so many ways, "Endgame" is the ultimate statement for Voyager, the perfect microcosm: It's a great-looking action/adventure outing that can be fun and offer up some interesting sights and even compelling ideas, but it's too often contrived, artificial, unbelievable, and a disappointing cheat to those of us who think the show could and should offer more than the mastery of the superficial. It has skill, but little depth. Such is Star Trek: Voyager, the perpetual Trekkian underachiever, which now is over.

But the Trek franchise continues — and immediately, it would have it. At the end of next month, the latest entry to the franchise, the prequel series Enterprise, premieres. I will be watching it. And I will be reviewing it, staying on the Trek reviewing beat for a while longer. If you too are on board for Enterprise, I'll see you there ... and soon.

Previous: Season 6

◄ Season Index

73 comments on this post

Mon, Apr 7, 2008, 10:15pm (UTC -6)
My favorite episode of Voyager was 'Equinox', because it was a small glimmer of what Voyager could have been. Namely, a constant fight for survival where sometimes morals and ideals had to take a back seat to practicality. The kill or be killed mentality that was used on DS9 made for great television. After all what's more dramatically satisfying, perfect people doing the right thing? Or flawed and desperate people trying to do the right thing but sometimes coming up short?
Wed, Apr 30, 2008, 10:57am (UTC -6)
I have been re-watching Voyager on Spike for some time now,and I must concur with the general analysis here. It was a series that could have been so much more--a DS9 or even a Battlestar--if the writers had realized what a good cast they had and what a potential vehicle for good,allegorical storytelling the show was.It was better than Enterprise(by that time it was as if nobody gave a damn at all).
The previous poster mentioned the episode Equinox as a template for what Voyager should have been dealing with,but I guess the writers were just too afraid of upsetting the kiddies by making the crew anything less than unrealistically perfect. Shame.
Alexey Bogatiryov
Sun, Mar 1, 2009, 11:33pm (UTC -6)
Jammer, did you ever thing that Voyager should have been more like BSG? Maybe Moore made BSG as a response to being denied a strong role on Voyager. The cynical and gritty - tough style of BSG would have fit Voyager's situation better. I agree that Equinox showed where Voyager could have gone. Maybe Bragga was a Trek idealist at heart.
Fri, Apr 3, 2009, 11:57am (UTC -6)
Personally, I've always thought Braga let his success on TNG (& that Hugo he won for co-writing TNG's finale) go to his head.
This is why he & the other Voyager writers basically spent Voyager's run trying to dementedly recreate "Yesterday's Enterprise" & "The Best of Both Worlds" in another form.
Sun, May 17, 2009, 2:31pm (UTC -6)
I just watched Equinox on Youtube. I agree that Voyager's tone should have been more like that. I don't condone Ransom's actions, but Janeway was incredibly naive & simplistic by not placing herself in his shoes & just condemning him outright.
Ransom: "It's easy to cling to principles when you're on a ship with its bulkheads intact manned by a crew that's not starving."
Janeway: "It's never easy, but if we turn our back on our principles we stop being human."
She might as well have said, "Well, the show's production staff is obviously more obliging to us."
As Jammer pointed out elsewhere, any extreme damage Voyager takes becomes a non-issue by the end of the episode.
It's a pity that the show was never given the power & nuance it could've had (Lessing & Gilmore would've certainly made encore appearances had Equinox been a TNG or DS9 installment).
Fri, Jan 1, 2010, 4:07pm (UTC -6)
If you think about it, a Star Trek series needs seven seasons. Two to get going, three to be really good and one or two final seasons to start going downhill again. I've seen this trend with TNG and VOY (DS9 being an honourable exception), and I was beginning to see this trend with ENT (well, I don't like the fourth season, but the fanbase sure did). Who knows? If ENT had continued, so might this trend.
Mon, Jan 4, 2010, 11:25am (UTC -6)
I fail to see how TNG's final season was any worse than DS9's (here come those rabid, foaming-at-the-mouth DS9 fans with their intricate excuses for why saying something like that is unacceptable).
Wed, Jan 20, 2010, 11:07am (UTC -6)
I think it's a real shame that Kenneth Biller maintained the Status Quo of Rick Berman and Brannon Braga. I hoped that he would take the series in a completely different direction and really leave a creative mark on it. But no. He might as well have stayed in his supervising producer position for all the "change" he brought to Voyager. When a new executive producer took over on Doctor Who, the series would always change and look different under each producer. The series would become darker or lighter, scarier of funnier. With Star Trek, and Voyager in particular, nothing new came with the coming and going of Executive Producers. Such a waste.
Thu, Jan 21, 2010, 3:14pm (UTC -6)
I think the remark on Voyager playing to viewers who don't want anything different in their Trek may be close to the mark why Voyager was so dissapointing.

Consider DS9, the most different Trek, and the backlash from a vocal part of the fans:

- It's a static location, not a starship!
- Ongoing story arcs? It's a soap opera!
- Respectful treatment of spirituality? Trek should be about science, not religion!

So, we get Voyager and Enterprise. And the story suffers, because there is only so many ways you can rehash TOS.
Wed, Feb 24, 2010, 11:24pm (UTC -6)
In thinking about Jammer's assertions that Star Trek Voyager, and Star Trek Enterprise were not well developed as serial shows, with indepth characters and an overall story arc viewers would care about, I offer the following thoughts:

Even though Star Trek DS9 is often considered the best written and crafted series, with complexity, character flaws and conflict, politics and religion, even failings of the Federation explored, when I come home from a hard day, I want to imagine a better world, and I find I watch Star Trek: Next Generation and Star Trek Voyager far more than DS9, or a story like Battlestar Galactica: Reimagined.

I have sat down and watched Bonanza, a Western from the 60's, and the single episode stories, where characters are archetypes, the good guys win and there are happy endings, is a formula that I can still see in Star Trek Enterprise in 2005. Is this a bad thing? It is a throwback to an earlier era of television, whereas we live in more complex times, and it can be argued viewers expect more complex, serialized and realistic storylines and characters. My parents grew up in the 50s and 60s, a time when jobs like that of a policeman or politician were seen more as archetypes, and where books and magazines were less common, nevermind the information provided by cable television or the Internet. People generally knew their neighbours, had closer connections to family, and traditions and authority in general were just beginning to be challenged.

Even now as I watch Enterprise, the use of allegory and (sometimes) corny alien masks seem somehow out of place when realistic drama and even sitcoms can discuss social issues like gender, abortion or the environment. The writing for Voyager and Enterprise was not always as crisp or witty as that for say, Stargate Atlantis or Joss Whedon's Firefly, but the main differences were the threads of tolerance, compassion, high principles and respect for life in all its forms.

Branon Braga has mentioned a "Mythology of Star Trek", and my interpretation of this is that the themes of universal love, tolerance and sacrifice for higher principles helps give Star Trek meaning beyond just being an entertaining TV show. I have heard an appeal by a producer of another Scifi show to allow people to take what they want and need from an artistic creation; that if a story helps people to learn, to love, to heal, to build friendships then what matters most is that the story lived and not who is right or wrong. If Star Trek is about tolerance, then it's great that we have Star Trek Voyager, as well as a darker version, DS9, and other creations like Battlestar or Firefly. IDIC.

Regards, Dean
Tue, Apr 27, 2010, 6:37am (UTC -6)
Having recently just ploughed through all seven seasons box-sets (in a fairly short period), I have to say that Season Five was the highlight (easily).

Also I think I can (now) safely list my favourite characters :-

1) The Doctor (bit of a no-brainer)
2) Tuvok
3) Seven of Nine
4) Janeway
5) Neelix (controversial I know)

And (just for fun), my bottom three...

1) Chucky (Mr Go Native)
2) Paris (Mr Cliché)
3) Torres (Little Miss Angry)
Thu, May 6, 2010, 6:18am (UTC -6)
Many peple especially star trek fans , whether they liked voyager or not, believe that Voyager was, in contrast with DS9, a "true" Star Trek, that means that it remained faithfull to star Trek's principles.
In my opinion they are wrong, deeply wrong. Making a caricature of TNG is not the same as staying "true" to star trek principles. Using the same themes again and again (time travel, mysterious space phenomena, allien of the week), themes which were allmost exhousted after 79 TOS apisodes and 178 TNG episodes is just boring. True some of these themes can still be used creatively but nothing like that happened in Voyager. The alien of the week was just one more humanoid with just a litle different nose or ears. "Future's End" was a descent story but nothing like "city at the endge of Forever" or "Yesterday's Enterprise, or "Past Tense" or even " Time's Arrow".
So what they could have done? they could follow the original premise of the series and put this crew and its starfleet principles in front of the challenge of surviving in a totally uknown territory and of making a desperate journy back home. They could give us new life forms really new and challenging. But they didn't. The choose the easy and safe solution.
I 'm not ssying that Voyager was a bad series. Not at all. It was certainly much better that later series like Andromeda or Stargate. But it was (at least until Enterprised was released) the most inferior trek series and a dissapointment becouse it had great potential which only rarely was realized.
Thu, May 6, 2010, 6:31am (UTC -6)
And something more. How much Voyager respected Trek's princiles when in Tuvix Janeway killed anew life just becouse she wanted her friend Tuvok back, In Equinox she was ready to torture a man and in Endgame she changed all history and eliminated millions of lives just to get back Seven of Nine? I believe that Voyager in some episodes (not all) violated the famous Roddenberry's vision much more than DS9 did.
Bad Horse
Thu, May 6, 2010, 3:52pm (UTC -6)
These days, I wonder if any Trek series would survive for long if it incited this level of web rage. 2001 doesn't seem like so long ago that the producers would just tell the fans to take a hike because the ratings are good enough. And now it seems that DS9 has gotten its long-overdue props, while Voyager languishes deep in fan hell. Of course, DVD has a big part to play in that, but really, isn't the ratings mindset why network TV is dying?
Wed, May 26, 2010, 6:45pm (UTC -6)
I think Bad Horse (the thoroughbred of sin?) has an important point. The ratings mindset translating to the death of network TV.

Still, I enjoyed Voyager. Not as immensely as perhaps I would have liked. On more than one occassion, I've been rather frustrated with the lack of exploration into the setting and characters they had. I would have liked to see Christie Golden's books (of Voyager after its return) realized on screen.

I have been a Trek fan for decades. TNG was a great series to me, and I can watch any single episode of it and usually enjoy it sufficiently, and for the great ones enjoy it immensely.

I warmed up to DS9 eventually, and have become very fond of it. But let me be honest... I love DS9 because it's Babylon 5 in the Federation universe.

I thought Voyager did well in the formula of episodic TV. But my disappointment was that the premise and the cast could have done a lot more. I think it's fine just as it is. But with that cast and setting, I think it would have been a great candidate for longer reaching story arcs.
Sun, Jun 13, 2010, 6:05am (UTC -6)
I think that the fact that Voyager was episodic was one of its problems. I mean after 79 TOS episodes and 178 TNG episodes ( a total of 257 episodes) how many more episodes anyone can make with the alien of the week or Temporal/spatial anomalies etc? there is a limit to the stories that can be written in this way. Not to mention that we didn't see any interesting aliens (besides species 8472) just caricatures like the Kazon and the Hirogen. Ofcourse the episodic format is not an excuse for the inconsistencies in the characters or for Janeway killing Tuvix.
Mon, Jan 10, 2011, 8:24pm (UTC -6)
After seeing most of the Voyager episodes, I would say that the most important of Voyager was its 4th season. You had excellent shows made here such as Scorpion Part II, Prey and the two-parter Year of Hell. Even Ronald B. Moore said that he thought Voyager should have been more like the episode Year of Hell where Janeway took great risks--by defying the Doctor's commands to step down from her post and chose to die with Voyager by deliberately ramming it into the Krenim time-ship. She was truly on the edge in that episode...but in most Voyager episodes, the ship is one happy family and few things ever go wrong which is just not realistic when your'e alone in the Delta Quadrant. Even Captain Ransom in the Equinox broke the Prime Directive because his crew were starving and his ship was only a survey vessel--not a fully equipped starship like Voyager. Maybe that's why Janeway could obey the Prime Directive while Ransom couldn't--she had a massive starship with huge food and military reserves unlike Ransom. Janeway should have followed Neelix's advice to Tuvox in the fisr season show "Learning Curve" to 'bend' the rules a bit if the situation demands it but not 'break' it outright as Tom did in "Thirty Days." The producers should have given the viewers more situations of Janeway taking life and death decisions such as in 'Year of Hell.' Season 4 should have reset Voyager on a new course and the producers missed the opportunity.

By the way, Jammer recommends 11 of the shows in its season 7 but 'Flesh and Blood' was a two-parter, so that would mean 12 episodes...out of 26 episodes in Voyager's final season. Still a mediocre record for its producers. If you total all of Jammer's 3 stars reviews (and higher 3.5 or 4 stars) and add 1 more for the second part of Flesh and Blood, you get 84 episodes out of Voyager's total of 172 episodes or only 49%. Hardly an earthshattering record...though I would have given 3 stars to Future's End Part II. It was somewhat interesting.

My favourite Voyager characters are:
1. The Doctor
2. Seven of Nine
3. Belana Torres (a standout actress)
4. Tom Paris
5. Captain Janeway

My least favourite actors:
1. Ensign Kim (he never really grew into the show)
2. Chakotay (was good/great in Scorpion, Nemesis, The Equinox, Unity, Workforce but somehow the #2 guy in the starship remains a mystery to most viewers...which is not a good thing. Maybe an error on the producer's part but I don't really like this situation. Yes he was loyal to the Captain but surely we needed to see how Chakotay would have led Voyager if he was in charge more often. But no, the producers didn't want to take risks or break with convention.)
3. Neelix (He was ignored in most Voyager episode scripts. One wonders why he remained in the show at all except to cook the crew's meals. And yet he did save the ship from destruction in 'Investigations' and had fairly decent outings in 'Fair Trade' and 'Homestead' when he exited Voyager.)

The only X character is 'Tuvox.' Tim Russ played him well as a senior Vulcan officer in Voyager. Tuvox seemed to have important roles in the first part of the series (Alter Ego, etc) but later in the second part of the show, his role seems to have been dimished far too much. Don't know what to make of him.
Tue, Jan 11, 2011, 10:05pm (UTC -6)
3 Minor Corrections to my previous post.

I meant to say that the most important year of Voyager was its 4th season when Seven of Nine replaced Kes. And, of course, Ronald D. (not B.) Moore argued later that Voyager should have taken more risks and played more episodes such as the two-parter Year of Hell. Unfortunately, TPTB missed the chance. Sometimes, I wonder how a gripping show like the Year of Hell was even made where Janeway rejects the Doctor's command to step down and decides to literally go down with the ship at the episode's conclusion. That was quite gripping.

Secondly, I meant to say that Janeway should have followed Neelix's advice to Tuvox in the first season episode closer "Learning Curve" to 'bend' the Federation's rules a bit if the situation demands it. Her minor interference in saving Neelix's life in Homestead doesn't count since the Talaxians there knew about Voyager's existence and were a space faring people already. But TPTB had other views. Finally, Tuvox's role in Voyager diminished (that's the right word) as the show progresssed. Sure he had a good role in recalling his prior life in Workforce which sets in motion the plot there but he was mostly underused as a senior Voyager officer--a bit like Chakotay...even though Tim Russ was an excellent actor.
Tue, Feb 15, 2011, 1:26am (UTC -6)
Voyager was by no means a bad series - but it was often aggravating. This was a time when Babylon 5 and DS9 re-defined what stories SF series could tell - and just as B5 spawned the mediocre Crusade, DS9 had to compete with its little sister show (and suffered from middle-child syndrome as a result).

Most of the main characters have gone through more (and more believable) development in the six books released up to now in the Voyager Relaunch (the Christie Golden books mentioned by alvinc were just the start) than they did over the entire length of Voyager's run. And I don't mean this as an endorsement of the books (though I do like them, Full Circle and Unworthy in particular), but as a criticism of the series. This setup had a lot of potential, and virtually all of it went to waste. How disappointing.
Fri, Feb 17, 2012, 11:29am (UTC -6)
Love voyager when I was barely watching it on tv.

Love DS9 when I was watching it on netflix, cant stop playing 1episode to the next. (I felt the same for ENT).

The discrepancy is the chatacter arcs in DS9 may get you confused when trying to understand the series as a whole. Whereas voyager, I can watch anytime I want and be entertained.

TNG got me hooked on TV and watching 1 episode after another. AND have thought-provoking messages. AND I care sooooo much about each and everyone of the cast.

Voyager could've been so much more. As a woman, romance should've been J/C hands down, tom/bellana if course was done good but could've been even better, 7/doc or 7/kim that someone suggested was not a bad idea. If kim was allowed to grow, it would've been perfect. Love Tuvok, the ignored a talent right there. They could've made him the anchor for Captain J like it insinuated from the start just as picard was TNG's anchor and Kira was for DS9.
Thu, Feb 23, 2012, 1:16pm (UTC -6)
I've been watching my Voyager collection lately, and was thinking about the critical commentary on it. Voyager definitely comes across as TOS updated for the 90s, as you mentioned earlier, Jammer. Even a 60s Western like Bonanza has a lot in common with VOY and ENT, with its character archetypes and standalone episodes.

As a ritual, I'd watch this and TNG after school, and whatever this says about me as a viewer/critic, I did watch it as Berman intended: I loved the moral and scifi concepts the show depicted, or at least aspired to, and the cast became, as corny as it sounds, a family I invited into my living room each week.

When I read critical reviews here, or a blog such as "Asking the Wrong Questions", what comes across is a desire for novelty, flash, shock or surprise, the kind of techniques Joe Menosky lamented in "The Muse". Stories, to my understanding, are there to teach as much as entertain and I've welcomed the role models shown in Star Trek.

However, as others have alluded to, Star Trek has become heavily watered down and themes recycled, especially after stopping the acceptance of unsolicited stories, with which Michael Piller probably saved Voyager. Taken on its own terms, Voyager has many entertaining stories, and some interesting ideas about adhering to principles, individuality and sentience. I'm glad they had a few bombs, such as "Threshold" and "Vis a Vis", which gave a good laugh and reminds me not to take things too seriously.

As an aside ...

I'm not sure what the future holds for TV given that seasons are half what VOY was. There has definitely been a trend for more intense, gritty, realistic drama and detailed characters, which may in no small part be a result of the Internet age. As technology both connects and isolates us, people may look for dramas to show realistic, detailed characters, plots and worlds, as a kind of reaction to the anonymity of modern life. I know this may be controversial, and it may be stretching, but I've been puzzled about the desire for complex, developed characters and stories, when tv itself is art, or entertainment, and an escape from reality.
Latex Zebra
Wed, May 16, 2012, 5:06am (UTC -6)
The writers could have brought Voyager home a few episodes before the finale and still had the actual story of how they got home saved for a big massive last episode.
I doubt there was a person alive watching the program that didn't know they would get home in the end.
So why not, 4 episodes before the end have an episode that starts with the subtitle - A few years from now! And then an episode that deals with some emotional issues of their return. There are so many ways a decent writer could tell this story and the only spoiler would be the fact that that character survived. Which most of us expected them all to do anyway.
Captain Jim
Thu, Jun 21, 2012, 9:38pm (UTC -6)
Will said, "If you think about it, a Star Trek series needs seven seasons. Two to get going, three to be really good and one or two final seasons to start going downhill again."

I certainly agree with the "two to get going part." TOS was an exception, of course, and I'm not sure Voyager really fit the pattern exactly either. But TNG was pretty mediocre until season three. DS9 didn't introduce the Dominion until season three, and that was a turning point, IMO. I even think that Enterprise improved greatly in its third season, with the whole Xindi subplot but, regrettably, most of its audience had quit watching by that point.

Latex Zebra said, "I doubt there was a person alive watching the program that didn't know they would get home in the end."

Actually, on the DVD commentary, they say that, for a long time, they planned to not bring them home. They were going to play up the whole thing about "the journey" being what's important, not "the destination" (Kim's speech in the final episode).
Thu, Oct 11, 2012, 8:44am (UTC -6)
I liked Voyager from the start and to this day it's still my favorite. I guess the idea of trying to get home was exciting instead of the exploring space theme. I also loved the characters the best of any trek series. Don't get me wrong, Picard and Data are still my top favorite, but other than that I found the rest of TNG crew unexciting. DS9 was even worse- didn't like ANY of the characters it had to offer. NONE. I wanted to like them but... And of course Voyager had it's hits and misses on characters but I liked the Doctor, Seven, Torres, Paris, Tuvok, and get this, sometimes Neelix (sometimes).
Wed, Nov 7, 2012, 12:41pm (UTC -6)
Voyager was entertaining. Beside a few episodes, you rarely feel like you just wasted an hour of your time to watch it. And for a now "old" TV show, it looks very good. The effects were nice. The ships could move and fire at the same time, which wasn't always the case in TNG. But it is true that a lot of its potential was wasted. The idea of two crews (that shouldn't get along well) lost in space trying to get home just sounds better suited to arcs and continuity instead of reset-button episodes. While not damaging the exterior of the ship, they could have had more recurrent problems with some systems. And it would make more sense to have the transporters offline at the beginning of some episode and have to do without them instead of just losing them a few seconds before you could fix everything with a good beam out (well, if Harry ever got a lock). The results are the same, but there is more continuity and you can build some challenge too. Or introduce a miracle technical solution coming from a Delta quadrant species if you really want things to be perfect on Voyager (it did feel like a cruise ship way too much. That was good for TNG, less for Voyager).

If they wanted everybody to be a big family faster and avoid major conflicts, then the Maquis should have been a transport ship crew and not rebels. It does makes sense in a way for them to be so friendly in the latter seasons, but they underused the tension before that. Or never had any memorable event that would make everybody best buddies. Sure some tensions existed and the Seska situation happened, but she wasn't a true Maquis anyway. And sometimes I think they took good ideas and made them happen too early or too late in the series (like the Equinox, it should have been before Voyager started the big jumps across space)

And really the big thing about Voyager is the characters. Some of them are better than their TNG counterparts (like the Doctor is more interesting than Dr. Crusher, even if his stories are more like those of Data) but those that are worse and just way way worse (Harry Kim for one). Harry had a few moments, but most of the time he was there to say bridge technobabble, to be the fool or to be Tom Paris' Milhouse. They really should have taken a few things from Paris like the love for the 20th century and give it to Harry to help him have some character. Talking of Paris, he was an okay character (he did have a story arc too!) but he was used in so many different situation that made little sense (why send the chief pilot to sick bay duty instead of taking a science guy to be the nurse or a Maquis. But I guess they didn't even have field medics in the Maquis). His concept was simple and had potential after all (Han Solo in Star Trek).

For the other characters, Janeway wasn't always consistent (they could have used that to explain future Janeway in Endgame, how she already started bending some rules), but she was alright. But the problem was that her 2 highest ranked crewmembers were almost never doing anything. In TNG, Riker had the away mission duties to make him do something, but in Voygaer Chakotay pretty much had nothing to do most of the time (a few speeches and rare episodes). He had a clear backstory that gave him potential, but it was just there and nothing special happened. Especially in the latter seasons. Tuvok was better than Chakotay, but he was really underused. He was interesting, and it would have been nice to see him more focus on him when he is in Vulcan-mode (Many of the Tuvok episodes are about Tuvok not being Tuvok/Vulcan-like if I remember correctly). Instead of just looking at character trying to be human, why not focus on being happy at not being human even if surrounded by human? Tuvok was preparing the phasers and leaving the bridge with a phaser in hand most of the time we saw him during the last few seasons...

Really, many of the characters could have been good. They pretty much all had a little something that could make them interesting (Even Harry as the fresh ensign, but that didn't went very well). And I do think some of them were very good too. Like the Doctor (beside the fact that I find it strange that he got emotions so quickly compared to Data without any extraordinary program manipulation) and Seven of Nine (maybe overused, but worked well). B'Elanna was a nice character too (and a show focusing on her was usually a good one), even if she wasn't used to her full potential (but the pregnancy of the actress in S4 didn't help. At least it was good reason to underuse her). Even Neelix and Kes could have been much more interesting. But Neelix was mostly relegated to comic relief and Kes was written off.

And I also find it strange that for a series where the crew can't be changed there wasn't a better use of recurring guest characters. TNG did it well with Chief O'Brien and Nurse Ogawa. I know that production reasons explain a lot of it, but the show was made for that. Voyager did ok on that front with Naomi Wildman and Icheb, but it could have been interesting to have more character of that type (like expanding on Mother Wildman). I also wonder who is in charge on the bridge when all the main characters are together in the briefing room or the mess hall.

Voyager is a nice show, that's for sure, but its biggest problem is that some of the flaws are visible and if you decide to think about the show, you won't miss them.
Tue, Dec 17, 2013, 2:23pm (UTC -6)
I'm currently on a mission to watch every episode of Star Trek. I'm not watching in any particular order, mainly starting with my favourites.

TNG was such a good show that even though I only finished the full series this year, I felt a real loss and was sad it ended. Even if the latter seasons did have a habit of being a bit too monster of the week.

With Voyager I remember really enjoying it, but on rewatch I'm left a bit empty. I'm a quarter through season 6 and it just seems that much of it is TNG with a different crew and less regard for characters. Janeway has become really annoying with her constant swapping and disregard for the Prime Directive as and when it suits (And I'm still disgusted at her murder of Tuvix).

in Equinox she was especially awful, becoming a would be torturer and throwing away everything we knew about her because... screw it.

I agree that Voyager really missed its potential. It needed stronger arcs. One big bug bear for me is how the Marquis/ starfleet issue was handled. It seemed apart from a few minor instaces that these rebels with a cause integrated so seemlessly that it made the initial premise pointless. Instead of the Kazon, the real conflict should have been the Marquis/ starfleet. If I were to plot the series I'd likely do something like this:

Season 1- dealing with the loss, the newness of it all, and a strong conflict between Marquis and Starfleet.

season 2- More episodes dealing with the previous conflict, as well as the realisation that they are living on basics. Season 2 SHOULD have ended, or at east involved a Marquis rebellion- imagine the position that would place Torres and Chakotay? Instead of a Kazon take over it should have been Marquis.

Season 3-4- should have dealt with the ship having to survive more basically, more quests for fuel and food, Voyager hould have been getting rid of the Holodecks by this stage.

Season 5 should have had the ship becoming more battered and bruised, running almost always in gray mode. Areas of the ship out of bounds, unusable and damaged. Voyager should be a bit more broken. Even take the Doc offline for several episodes.

Season 6 - should have been more about survival and getting home at all costs, more questions about what is the right thing, more along the lines that the Equinox went through- just what is acceptable. The ship is on its last legs, will it even survive another episode? Kill off a main crewmember not for shock value but because that is what would happen- heck, the pilot killed off nearly all the senior staff.

Season 7- They should get home early in the season and the rest of the time spent acclimatising to the Alpha Quadrant, what did these people do once they got home? how were they affected?

Actually, maybe even just make it a 6 or 5 season show.

Voyager was always too clean and even when it was nearly destroyed like in Deadlock, it was clean and shiny by the next week.
Wed, Dec 18, 2013, 10:55am (UTC -6)
@AshP: I agree in concept, but the creators didn't even need to go as far as you did.

Season 2 was Voyager's only real attempt at continuity, but it didn't work because a) the Kazon were boring bad guys and b) There were too many logical gaffes (like the absurd plot to get Paris kidnapped by the Kazon). Instead of improving on execution, the creators essentially gave up and went for "TNG in the Delta Quadrant."

That didn't work because the characters on Voyager weren't nearly as good and because the show wasn't new or fresh conceptually. Voyager does have its moments, but its best character work (aside from the Doctor and Seven) is usually found in episodes that didn't really happen (like Kim in "Timeless" or most of the cast in "Before and After").

One thing that I could never understand is why the show didn't explore more of the characters' pasts. Granted, having a relative stop by -- like in "The Icarus Factor" -- would have been difficult. But with all the flashbacks we see dating back to "Caretaker", why not see more that went back further? Why not show how Torres and Chakotay met in the Maquis? Why not relive Paris's capture? Why not show what Janeway was doing before she took command on Voyager?

There are a few episodes where we see characters' pasts ("Tattoo", "Barge of the Dead", "Gravity", "Flashback", and "Thirty Days".) But so much was left unsaid. Given the expansive backstories of characters like Data, Worf, Riker, Sisko, Picard, Kira, O'Brien, Bashir, etc., you figure Voyager could have done more.
Fri, Dec 20, 2013, 3:59pm (UTC -6)
You see, this is why season 2 is my favourite season in terms of tone - the continuity of the Kazon/Seska plot plus great individual episodes like Resistance, The Thaw, Deadlock and Persistence Of Vision. Of course, continuity doesn't make sense when you consider that the Kazon would have had to have been chasing Voyager for 2 years at warp 9 point whatever. But very little about Voyager does make sense.

What I actually like about seasons 1-2 is that the show wasn't trying to be "fun", which it was very much so from season 3 onwards. When you think about episodes like season 1's Prime Factors and State Of Play, Voyager doing those episodes any time after season 3 is inconceivable due to the shift in tone.
Hector Nuno
Sat, Jan 11, 2014, 1:11am (UTC -6)
Star Trek Voyager, in my opinion it stands as the worst of the Star Trek shows.

Yes I would even take Enterprise over Voyager, at least Enterprise had a premise and characters that improved over time, and at the very least utilized its location and setting every once in awhile. Personality, and sadly, seeing the plans the writers had prepared for Season 5, I do believe that it would have redeemed the series. At the very least it deserved 7 years far more then Voyager did.

Now let me clarify that I do not believe it was terrible as many Voyager haters do. There were good episodes and I love the Doctor, even if his journey was just a rehash of Data from TNG.

My discontent for Voyager stems from one simple fact. If you watched 'Caretaker' and 'Endgame' back to back, you would have missed absolutely nothing of consequence. Aside from 7of9 appearing and Kes/Nelix disappearing, there really wouldn't be any questions for the audience to ask about anything.

Compare that to TNG and DS9, where the beginnings and ends are virtually indisguishable. In the end, Voyager always kept to the status quo to its
last second of screen time, and its characters and stories suffered greatly from that.

Janeway: As far as I am concerned she should be court-martialed for everything she did in the Delta quartet. Instead she's promoted to admiral in Nemesis.

She really needed to loosen up in the series, both as a character and from her principles as a captain. Instead the show practically worshipped her, and constantly prized her choices and leadership. When in reality she is probably the most incompetent captain in star fleet history.

Look no further then the first episode, where she doesn't even understand the simple idea of a timed fuse. Instead using her own flawed judgment, and hers alone, rarely factoring in others. Ironically, she becomes the Voyager greatest enemy and threat, had it not been for the writers Voyager would not have survived a month under with her leadership.

The Doctor: The only character who ever came to life in my opinion, and while he was a data rehash, it was one that I welcomed and enjoyed. Even in the worst episodes, Picardo always found a way to impress me and keep me invested.

Neelix: Imagine Jar Jar Binks, Seasons 1-2 Wesley Crusher, and the TNG Feregeni all merged into one character to capture my feelings for him.

7of9: The only other character I enjoyed, but was blatantly overused and once again never changes, or learns, from her many repeated and tiresome lessons. With every step forward taken with her, there were two steps taken back.

Harry/Paris/Chakotay/Torres/Kes: Who are they? I'm literally not sure who they were, and why they were even in this series to begin with.

Tuvok: I liked Vulcans and Tim Russ, and that's all I can really say about Tuvok. Easily the most underutilized asset this show had.

As for the series itself, my favorite episode is Timeless. Episodes like scorpion, Equinox, and Year of Hell never impressed me, because while they told good stories the consequences were minimal to nonexistent.

In conclusion, Voyager to me is a mediocre and underwhelming series with one of the most wasted casts I've ever seen in television. So much potential all washed away and wasted, had Voyager been fully realized, I'm not sure where it would rank. But at the very least it would have measured more when compared to TOS/TNG/DS9/ENT, instead of looked down upon constantly.

I'm sure many would disagree with me, but this is just my opinion. You're entitled to your own, just as I am to mine.
Mon, Jan 13, 2014, 10:18am (UTC -6)
@Hector Nuno:

I agree with a lot of what you said, though I think you're a little overly harsh on the characters.

Paris and Torres were fairly well developed. Torres was sort of all over the map at times and Paris was only used well in spots ("Thirty Days" was an unheralded standout). But they were better used than most everyone else.

The fact is, Voyager tried to develop all of the characters early in its run but largely gave up with some characters (Chakotay, Tuvok) or just did a terrible job with others (Kim, Neelix).

As far as Janeway, I mostly agree. Star Trek seemed pretty set on lionizing its captains in both Voyager and Enterprise. Janeway's actions didn't really stand up to scrutiny and Archer's petulance made it hard for him to be a "man of destiny." In both cases, the creators overcompensated, which just showed how much they were missing the mark.

Making Janeway an admiral for "Nemesis" and then saying that she was "one of the most decorated officers in Starfleet history" in "Endgame" was just ridiculous. I'm sure the creators looked back on Kirk, his cowboy style and his celebrated career. But Voyager actually had a scene (in "Flashback") where Janeway explained to Kim how starfleet captains had changed.

It's a great scene, actually. But it could have been an instance where Janeway could have said that "In our current situation, we are more like a Starfleet crew 100 years ago." That would have been a great moment -- and maybe it would have justified Janeway's actions over the next six seasons.

Of course, Voyager missed an opportunity there, which was par for the course.
Thu, Jan 30, 2014, 4:56pm (UTC -6)
So, another Trek series comes to an end.

To me, this series has been a big disappointment

The technical side of the show was great: costumes and make-up, visual and special effects, sound and music as well as scenography and props. All stellar.

The creative aspects of the show is a whole other story, giving us a very mixed stew of quality - unfortunately far too often leaning towards a big bowl of fail.

It's not as if the WHOLE show featured a lack of continuity, an abandonment of basic premises, a huge amount of plot holes, bad dialog and bad characterization ... but MOST of the show did. That's a shame, because much of the talent on-screen was worth much more than what they got to Work with.

Despite the fact that I found most of the show frustrating, I actually (after seven seasons) ended up caring a bit about some of the characters.

In the end, though, Voyager stands out among other Star Trek shows as the show with the biggest wasted potential due to its overall low quality of storytelling.

I'm sad to say that Voyager, to me, is the worst Star Trek show (yes, I liked "nterprise" better).
Fri, Apr 24, 2015, 4:23pm (UTC -6)
A good series. It is a lot easier to criticize than to praise it. I consider myself a huge Star Trek fan. When I say "Star Trek", I am speaking of the utopian future Gene Roddenberry envisioned, from the core of mankind improving the human condition itself to economics all the way to philosophical normative ideals. Whenever I watch a Star Trek show, I am expecting this premise to resonate through its fabric.

When I started out watching VOY, I did not expect any serialized soap drama we now find in almost every TV show (the incredibly manipulative, pseudo-level-of-suspense and pseudo-plot driven "Game of Thrones" being paramount here). I expected a show that (for the most part) conveys the serene, humbling and enlightened Roddenberry-vision even through its darker plots. I like the occasional character and relationship development, as well as progression of the Bigger Picture in Star Trek shows, but I never watch them for these. I am watching Star Trek to get positive-normative allegories on where mankind might end up in some distant future, when we finally will have been able to "kill the beast" within.

Bearing this in mind, I think VOY has delivered. And it's these unique characteristics that make Star Trek so outstanding among all these hip post-modern self-devouring TV-shows nowadays, which basically cuddle our vanities and fears of loss of ego and materialistic possessions.

3 Stars for Star Trek VOY from me. Now I am looking forward to watching Star Trek DS9 for the first time.
Tue, Oct 27, 2015, 11:59am (UTC -6)
*Very long rant ahead. Standing on me soapbox (dancing on it, really)Read at your own peril : )

I originally was going to write this in Season 1's "Emanations" but it turned into a long winded rant about the whole Star trek de-evolution.

The theme of death is never old. As we are all here a limited amount of time I doubt most people would be bored outright with the subject matter. Especially as we age.

However, I do have to comment on why all these alien races speak English. I know for entertainment's sake it's easier that way. But realistically? I have a hard time with suspension of disbelief at moments like these.

There's so little we know about our own galaxy, lovingly referred to as "The Milky Way." And while it's made for some wonderful double entendres (not to mention a tasty but un-nutritious candy bar) it's still a small speck in a much larger universe that we know next to nothing about.

I find it perfectly conceivable that there is plenty of life out there. I doubt we have all this universe to ourselves. No one could be that closeminded as to believe otherwise. Just because we can't see them doesn't mean they don't exist. It's like saying if you close your eyes the world doesn't exist anymore. If you believe that allow me to drench your sleeping self with cold reality called icewater.

And what are the odds they will see us? Comprehend us? We've had plenty of movies and tv shows depicting alien life. Yet in most of those it seems they almost always speak flawless English. We don't even use English exclusively on our own world! Yet all these other races we depict on tv somehow do? And they usually speak it with Oxford-graduate level acuity. That's better than your average New York cabbie.

As far as environment...well we know already we have no way of existing on most of the other planets in our solar system with their current climate, distance from the sun, etc. How do we know if any aliens we come into contact with would have any issues inhabiting any of these planets? For all we know, they may actually prefer Jupiter over Earth for whatever reason. Outside of the galaxy? The question alone can introduce a endless multitude of answers.

Lastly, toxicity. Yes, it's possible their very presence may be toxic to human beings (whether intentional or not). But it's also very possible our physiology may be just as lethal to them. Yet in spite of that they may actually still be a benevolent species. One that we would not be able to be in close proximity to. I wonder how the government would react to that? Based on history they'd first probably try to find a way to exist beside them, even if it took decades. But the ultimate goal would be to control them too and destroy them if they didn't comply.

As far as whether or not "they're here"...hmm...I don't know what to say. From the outside looking in I would not introduce myself to this planet in its current mindset. Which is NOT enlightened. Any species that points weapons of mass destruction at itself couldn't be described with that adjective in mind. Would humans be so willing to introduce themselves to an alien race that employs violence to achieve their means? Or create the ultimate weapons to destroy a planet they all have to coexist together on? probably not.

I suppose "they" could be walking amongst us. If they are then of course they have already proven to be superior to humans in one way: concealment. If they have the means to cloak themselves from our perceptions it certainly seems plausible they could do a lot more to us, good or bad. Maybe unlike us they use that superior ability for more benevolent causes. Like warn other races to steer clear of this planet right now. Too xenophobic. We can't even tolerate other humans that are different shades of color and appearance. What would we do with a new alien race that appears from the blue skies?

An unexpected concept may be that some other alien race may look at our state of being as being asleep. Or deceased. And that death is the ultimate boundary that needs to be crossed to truly be alive. But even then if they don't speak English how could they communicate that? We need corporeal bodies for our senses to perceive. If said race didn't exist in that form then what then? Does that mean they are not real?

Kind of leads us to this episode. This planet (indeed, its reality) doesn't even register on the star charts, let alone on the ship's sensor readings. And it wasn't until that subspace vacuole opened up and one of the members was pulled thru that we were introduced to this new species.

Obviously their interpretation of "death" is different from our own. But the real question for me is how do we know their isn't a reality right here amongst our own? That's the problem with the five senses. they are limited in their scope to perceive only earthbound objects. Small wonder our imaginations would always pander to it. Another common thread in this star trek universe is to somehow show humans as the best, the brightest, the most enlightened, the most powerful. Look how they've trivialized the Borg. And for that matter even the Q. And yet no other race ever came off as more petulant, either. At times the humans were far worse than any Klingon!

At its heart the show was supposed to be about enlightenment and tolerance for all. About transcending all the petty things that current society is plagued in. After World War 3 devastated modern society. Instead the show felt too many times like a modern society in a future fantasy, with all it's internal bickering. How they managed to even work together to create faster-than-light starships and be organized enough to travel the stars with other races in the ranks given the lack of teamwork, tolerance and self importance is beyond me. They never even showed a 4 star Starfleet Admiral that wasn't a middle aged white man. Let alone one from another race. More suspension of disbelief that only they are good enough for that level of command? In which they are now competing with other races and not just human ones for now??

I wonder what Gene Roddenberry would have said about Star Trek: Enterprise? We showed so little tolerance for each other (they treated Archer's dog better than Mayweather!) in that series. It's clear the show was a serious misstep. Voyager wasn't much better, but it was a bit more enlightened. Tho it seemed to lose that per season as well. At least Tim Russ, Robert Picardo and Jeri Ryan kept things interesting in it's twilight years.

*End rant

Still enjoyed the series a lot. Earlier seasons get better with time, in fact.
Tue, Oct 27, 2015, 10:19pm (UTC -6)
"They never even showed a 4 star Starfleet Admiral that wasn't a middle aged white man. Let alone one from another race."


Four Star Admirals:
T'Lara - female Vulcan (DS9: "Rules of Engagement")
Charlie Whatley - black male Human (DS9: "Rapture")

Fleet Admirals (a.k.a. Five Star Admirals):
Brackett - white female Human (TNG: "Unification, Part I")
Shanthi - black female Human (TNG: "Redemption, Part I")
Alynna Nechayev - white female Human (four appearances on TNG; two on DS9)
Harry Morrow - black male Human ("Star Trek III: The Search for Spock")
Cartwright ("Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home" and "Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country")

Not to mention the two non-Human Federation Presidents we saw in "Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country" and DS9: "Homefront/Paradise Lost".

Or were you referring only to VOY (where we saw very few admirals, let alone four or five star ones) and the main authority figure present was a woman (with a Native American as second-in-command and a black Vulcan as third-in-command)?
Fri, Feb 5, 2016, 9:46am (UTC -6)
I think the overall quality difference between Voyager and TNG isn't great and so Voyager overall isn't a bad show (they share some of the same weaknesses and strengths) but TNG is generally a better and more interesting show because it was generally was and felt a lot bolder and riskier and more significant, too often Voyager for whole episodes or at least the endings seemed to be too much playing it safe and even most of its successes and big changes were quickly reset-away and ignored.
Fri, Feb 12, 2016, 10:08am (UTC -6)
For another comparison, TNG didn't do much with its characters (aside from Picard and Worf) in its last two or three years, pretty much regressed Worf and Data in its final year and never did much with La Forge or Troi ... and yet even static versions of Riker, Worf and Data are generally more entertaining than Chakotay, Paris or Neelix.
Diamond Dave
Fri, Mar 25, 2016, 4:30pm (UTC -6)
So overall I scored this series at an average of 2.54 per episode, which puts it second on the list of Voyager series to me. It also scores above 4 series of TNG, but tellingly none of DS9, which probably accurately shows where my sympathies lie.

Voyager ultimately was something of a disappointment to me and this season has that in microcosm. At this stage of the game it looked a million dollars and the production values were exceptional. And yet more often than not we were getting the same broadly unimaginative fare - although this was a very consistent series early on in the season, from the dreadful Q2 there was a real drop off in quality for me leading up to a conclusion that was unsatisfying in many ways.

In character terms most just petered out for me, the Doctor went backwards, and even Seven suffered from overuse. A shame overall, as this could have been a lot better.
Sun, May 22, 2016, 5:12pm (UTC -6)
As for Voyager as a whole:

I remember hearing a story; not sure if it's true but I'm going to assume it is. Once upon a time, a Deep Space Nine episode was running a bit short. They could have padded it out somehow, maybe show the Defiant docking, or a turbolift slowly coming up to the bridge, or maybe have Dax or Miles spout some technobabble. Instead, the writers went back and added a little scene that wasn't necessary to the plot. It wasn't much, just Quark introducing Garak to root beer. And, of course, that dialogue ended up becoming one of the most famous scenes in all of DS9.

Why do I bring that up? Because writing a scene like that, at the last minute just to make sure the episode can get made, shows the care that the DS9 writers had for the show. They could have just padded the episode, but instead added something that complemented the episode perfectly and stood on its own. Likewise, Piller and company clearly showed great love towards TNG. Now, can you imagine a similar situation appearing in Voyager? An episode falling a bit short and the writers hastily adding in a brilliant scene that perfectly captures a couple of their characters? Because I can't. If Voyager was faced in a similar situation, we would definitely end up with technobabble or mindless bridge scenes or whatever. Never anything unique.

In the end, that's the problem with Voyager. It's not that it was necessarily bad; I was a bit surprised that when I rated it in only came in slightly below TNG (maybe I graded it on a curve, or maybe it's just due to TNG Season 1, or maybe both). However, it's an empty "good" show, it doesn't mean anything. TNG was daring, boldly going in all sorts of new directions, willing to take risks with their storytelling. Sometimes it failed, but the highlights of TNG more than make up for the occasional bad episode. In Voyager, it was just a consistent feeling of bland decency. Some episodes were boring, some were interesting, some were frustrating, but very rarely did one break out to make me take notice. If I were to make a top 10 list from TNG, I would struggle to pare the list down and kick out worthy episodes. For Voyager, I would struggle to pad out the list with episodes worthy of the few I really liked.

In the end, I think this is, again, about the heart. The writing just seemed lazy. How often did Harry fail to get a lock, or Tuvok state that shields are down to 36% (boom), 22%? How often did a crewmember ask Janeway for something, she said no, then the person pleaded and Janeway changed her mind? How often did characters do a complete 180 after a brief chat with someone else because the plot said so? How often did we get buried under a mountain of technobabble, or meet the hard-headed aliens of the week? The Voyager writers just had their list of tropes and plot devices, and pulled them out of a hat and used them liberally throughout the series. It led to a repetitive, predictable form of storytelling, which doesn't bode well for a series.

And then there's the continuity issue, which everyone seems to bury this show for. I've mentioned this before, but feel it's necessary to say again: the ship becoming perpetually beaten down and falling apart, or a Maquis mutiny, would have been a terrible idea. This is still Star Trek, and optimism should reign. The ship falling apart really limits your storytelling potential, and would probably lead to poor storytelling in an opposite direction. Likewise, the Maquis aren't stupid, and are going to adapt to the situation whether they like it or not. And I'm fine with non-serial storytelling. If that's what Voyager wanted to do, great. There's nothing wrong with that approach!

But every episode showing Voyager in danger and then perfectly fine the next? All the characters behaving like sterile Starfleet cutouts despite 25% of them not being Starfleet? That just makes you stop caring about the premise. You need some consistency to make us buy in to the situation. Otherwise, it's just a play being put on by the same cast members every week. Why should any of this matter?

Forget about the ship breaking down every week; why is it so sterile? On the Enterprise, crews were constantly rotating in and out. Likewise, it was a luxury liner; there was a bar and an arboretum and a swimming pool and a gym and anything you wanted. Here, it's the same 140 people seeing each other day in, day out, on a cramped vessel. Why was everyone still so formal by the end?

One scene I would have loved to have seen would be for a couple of the cast walking down the corridor discussing the plot or whatever like they always do, and just sidestepping out of the way of Naomi playing hopscotch (or better yet, the Move Along Home version of hopscotch, just to traumatize all the viewers...). Or have some extras jogging in the hallways, clearly as exercise. It would have absolutely nothing to do with the plot, but would simply show that people live here. Make the show more real.

I want to emphasize that Voyager wasn't completely devoid of these sorts of things. One episode did show Naomi skulking around the halls while everyone else did their thing. The communal holodeck programs were a great idea, even if not always executed correctly. Koddiskot and the Vulcan chess game were also nice touches. And every once in a while we would see other community events, which helped. But that's the problem, we'd see them, but then the very next episode it was back to a strange formality. Like nothing really mattered.

MASH had a similar concept, or people trapped amongst themselves for long periods of time in a quasi-military setting. And the setting was always very, very consistent. While the unprofessionalism of the 4077th may not have been appropriate, the lived-in feel was something sorely missing on this show.

We could have also worked in a serial nature of the show as well without compromising things. When the really bad explosions happen, spend a day or two with a bad set. They did it after Scorpion; why not do it after Deadlock. Or remember all that junk the various races gave Voyager in Survival Instinct? Why don't we ever see any of that again? In Family, Robert Picard gave his brother a bottle of wine, and told him to share it with someone. Half a season later, he does with the guest star in First Contact. It doesn't require remembering Family to enjoy the latter episode, but it helps give a sense of continuity to the series. Why don't we see more people simply relaxing in the mess hall rather than just eating? We see the main cast doing it all the time, but have some extras chilling around as well. Make it look like a real ship.

Two of the largest running jokes on the show are shuttle crashes and the endless supply of photon torpedoes. I can understand not wanting to be limited in your storytelling possibilities, but why not turn this into a strength? There's an empty space in the front of Engineering. Put a photon torpedo there for half of Season 2 and say B'Elanna is working on reverse engineering it so they can manufacture more. Voila, criticism solved without having it get in the way of your anomaly of the week or whatever other story you want, all while addressing the issue of being trapped in the Delta Quadrant. It also opens up other storytelling options. Maybe Tuvok would be assisting in this endeavor, being tactical officer and all. Hey, you know two people that didn't have many scenes together? B'Elanna and Tuvok! You know two people that deserved more scenes together? B'Elanna and Tuvok!! How did she feel about him betraying the Maquis? Maybe she's willing to work with him on the ship, but still doesn't like him personally because of that issue. And yet, she's also the one who hates her Klingon side and hates the fact that she can't always control her emotions, so perhaps she is a bit envious of him as well. The later seasons had Tuvok trying to teach her meditation; maybe that could have started here. Maybe it could have been a bigger part of the show, and given those two characters something else to do. Maybe they could have gone from being coldly distant to each other at the start and grown to be a close friendship by the end, much like Miles and Bashir. Instead, we barely got to know Torres, other than through her anger and through her relationship with Tom.

Again, I want to stress that Voyager never did anything like this. Something similar was done at the beginning of Season 4, when Kim and Seven worked together to build a new astrometrics lab. And guess what, that was good character work that also acknowledged their Delta Quadrant situation and gave Kim something else to do besides being the galactic whipping boy. So it's not like they don't know how to do this sort of thing. It was just very inconsistent throughout the show. And all of these changes would barely impact the actual stories (ie, don't require turning it into a serial show) while strengthening the background aspect.

You don't need to have a harsh, negative, desperate atmosphere to make a good series, but you do need to acknowledge the Delta Quadrant setting. You don't need to have a serial show with intertwined plots, but you do need more continuity and growth if you want to care about these characters. It's not that Voyager had bad ideas. They had several good ideas. But they weren't always executed well. And it was all executed with a amateurish, ankle-deep immersion factor due to this lack of heart and skimping on the details, which is probably what bugged me the most. It's an excellent show if you just randomly watch it with your brain turned off and don't care about the bigger picture, but in the end it could have been so much better.

And just for fun, my top 5 episodes:
1) Latent Image - best use of the EMH, a character I struggled with a lot in the show.
2) Scorpion - Trek has a good track record of having the Borg in a Season 3 cliffhanger...
3) The Thaw - Nothing special, just an excellent atmosphere and an even more excellent guest performance.
4) Lineage - Sorely needed character piece with a lot of heart in it.
5) Memorial - A wonderfully murky sci-fi concept that was well-handled.

And the bottom 5
1) Q and the Grey
2) Spirit Folk
3) Threshold (no, really! Only third!)
4) Unimatrix Zero
5) Elogium (except for the Samantha Wildman part)
Fri, Jul 8, 2016, 8:09am (UTC -6)
Wow, I've finished Voyager.

Here are my season 7 ratings:

Lineage / 4.00
Author, Author / 4.00
Imperfection / 3.50
Drive / 3.50
Body and Soul / 3.50
The Void / 3.50
Workforce / 3.50
Homestead / 3.50
Endgame / 3.50
Critical Care / 3.00
Flesh and Blood / 3.00
Human Error / 3.00
Nightingale / 2.50
Shattered / 2.50
Natural Law / 2.50
Renaissance Man / 2.50
Inside Man / 2.00
Repentance / 2.00
Friendship One / 2.00
Unimatrix Zero Part II / 1.00
Repression / 1.00
Prophecy / 1.00
Q2 / 0.50

Average: 2.65

Season 7 actually rated higher than I expected to. It rated a little lower than DS9's S7 but had a stronger closer.
Fri, Jul 8, 2016, 8:43am (UTC -6)
VERY interesting season comparison here.

Season / Average
Season 5 / 3.08
Season 1 / 3.07
Season 2 / 3.02
Season 3 / 2.88
Season 4 / 2.83
Season 6 / 2.75
Season 7 / 2.65

Series average: 2.89

Voyager Season 5 has to be one of, if not the best trek season. Wow, just fantastic. I still need to review TNG and Enterprise.

What kind of surprised me was my #2 and #3 were seasons 1 & 2. This obviously is where Voyager eclipsed DS9. My series average in DS9 was 2.65.

I probably watched Voyager from stem to stern 6 - 7 times? .... I love it every time and I truly find this one the most enjoyable to re-watch. I don't know that it's my favorite series, but I sure do enjoy it. I'm already sad my recent re-watch is over :-)

Every time I watch it, B'Elanna becomes a stronger character and Roxann impresses.

While I loved Voyager when Kes was there, they definitely made the right choice bringing in Jeri as 7. Wonderful part played to the tee by Jeri. What an impressive dynamic she brought to the show.

I think Voyager has the best actors (main cast) from head to toe of any of the spin-offs. Kate/Russ/Ryan/Dawson/Beltran/Picardo all bring it every week. Wang wasn't "bad" but not up to the others.

I really don't like to "compare" series. I love Voyager for what it is, as I do all the others.

Thanks Jammer (again) for providing a forum for amateurs like me to comment on our favorite franchise. I think I speak for everyone here when I say I hope you review the new series when it comes out in January.
Sat, Sep 3, 2016, 10:50am (UTC -6)
You'd think they'd maybe put some plants on the bridge, maybe Harry Kim could have put some Christmas lights up in his cabin window, or something to make it more friendly, after all those years.
Wed, Nov 23, 2016, 5:59am (UTC -6)
@Skeptical: I absolutely agree with you. It's not that voyager isn't good, it's just that it should have been so much better.

I've railed at the writers many (many) times over the course of this rewatch (3rd or 4th - not sure). I've found myself wondering at the cause. We know that they can produce excellence but sadly, that it was all too seldom. Is this because of time constraints? Were they under too much pressure to produce scripts on time, and couldn't allocate enough resources to ensure good work? Did they not have enough budget to have an employee cross-checking previous episodes to ensure that they weren't contradicting themselves?

I know I'll probably never have the answers I seek. I just can't escape the feeling that the producers took a "near enough is good enough" approach. It seems to me that quantity was far more important than quality. I guess that's business though.

I could go on but what's the point. It's done and dusted and you either like it or you don't. :(

Thanks to anyone who has actually read my postings. I know they're more often than not the ramblings of a disaffected (deranged?) aging Sci Fi fan, but I've enjoyed reading everyone's thoughts here, and hopefully even given someone else some enjoyment (or a laugh).

Goodbye all. I'll start another Trek series soon so maybe see you there...
Wed, Dec 28, 2016, 7:54pm (UTC -6)
Voyager is a show that I found somewhat appealing in my early teens because of the action and easily understood plots, but even then I tired of the overheated previews and watched it just for a year or two (Seasons 4-5, I think) before moving on. There was nothing in it that really challenged me or commanded my attention, and by the time Dwayne Johnson was guest-starring to fight a futuristic MMA match with Seven I had to roll my eyes. Now that I watch it as an adult, I can see why I lost interest.

1. Overuse of (and over-reliance on) things that I now recognize as signature tropes of ST: technobabble, time travel, fun with DNA, and the reset button. The writing was sometimes brilliant, but more often than not they settled for transparently episodic thumb-twiddling. Voyager felt more like a network product than an artistic vision, and the writers seemed to think almost every week was sweeps week where they had to pull some contrived stunt to grab the viewers' attention. After a while you just go numb and start ignoring it altogether.

2. I found most of the characters unappealing. Kim is too shallow and frivolous to be taken seriously. Paris is facile and immature. Chakotay serves no definite purpose. Janeway is a self-righteous, idealized creation that I don't think has aged very well since the 90s. Neelix is even more of that era as the pervasive "comic relief" character whom no one seems to find amusing. Whereas B'Elanna is all TOO believable a character to a 2010s observer: insecure, prickly, and disagreeable. Seven, the Doctor, Tuvok, and Kes are the only main cast members I find both likeable and engaging.

3. It never respected its own premise or utilized it to the fullest. Voyager just wanted to be TNG with more bells and whistles, and had the disconcerting effect of feeling both too retro and too modern, lacking a sense of self or a coherent central philosophy. That this never really changed in seven seasons explains why I grew out of the show in only a few years and rarely watch it now.
Thu, Dec 29, 2016, 7:55am (UTC -6)
Tuvok, the Doctor, and Seven ARE the best characters on this show by far.

Tuvok as a character I think is probably even under-rated. Next to Spock, this is how you play a convincing Vulcan.
Sun, Jan 1, 2017, 1:14pm (UTC -6)
Janeway was inconsistently written (especially after Jeri Taylor left), Chakotay/Kim were totally underwritten (I'm surprised Beltran didn't quit the show), Tuvok was almost totally boring and a waste of Tim Russ's acting talents, Paris was fine on his own terms I guess (though the "space playboy" is never gonna be a character that appeals to me). The Doc, Seven and B'Elanna (and Kes) were good characters, though B'Elanna could have used a little more focus, especially in the Seven era. The Paris/B'Elanna relationship was never especially deep but I do think it worked and was a good thing to do with the characters, especially as it represented one of the show's few genuine ongoing attempts at character development and showing the crew building relationships and starting families with each other.

My favorite season of Voyager will always be 2, as that was the show's best attempt at arc storytelling (the Kazon and Seska) plus it also had a good number of decent, original and compelling standalone episodes (Resistance, The Thaw, Deadlock, Persistance Of Vision etc.). S4+5 were strong too, but the ridiculous Dark Frontier represented a shark-jumping moment for me... I simply didn't believe it, and the same applies to Equinox, UMZ and Endgame. S6 was a near-total washout with only a few decent episodes (Child's Play and the Borg children mini-arc, plus Tinker Tenor and Survival Instinct). S7 was somewhat better (I think Imperfection was the best ep for me) and brought back some of the S4/5 sense of fun (in eps like Body And Soul) alongside thoughtful episodes like Workforce and Critical Care, but was still a mixed bag with no general direction.

Voyager was still a lot better than Enterprise though in terms of basic watchability, performances and characters. Voyager's the lightweight Trek, but lightweight is much better than outright dreck.
Sun, Jan 1, 2017, 1:18pm (UTC -6)
I forgot Neelix. I actually thought Neelix was fine, I didn't find him annoying and that being the case, I don't object to him being a frivolous comic relief character, he was just underutilized. Eps like Mortal Coil, Jetrel and Homestead presented a tragic side to him that worked very well - I'd have liked to see this explored further.
Tue, Oct 17, 2017, 3:54pm (UTC -6)
I watched the first few seasons of Voyager during their original broadcast but mostly stopped. It just seemed like lightweight rehashed TNG. And ways in which it differed, like the Seska episodes... silly, absurd, and soap opera in the worst ways. Meanwhile it all but completely chucked any real use of the premises.

But some part of the Voyager disdain was simply franchise fatigue.

Rewatching them now, or probably 2/3 for the first time, it's not so bad, since I know what to expect and that it ain't really going anywhere. Now I can pull up a random episode and enjoy it as a lightweight TNG.
Baron Samedi
Mon, Jan 1, 2018, 10:25pm (UTC -6)
Season 7 of Voyager is described pretty well here, in that feels pretty pedestrian. The writers have firmly settled into a formula for the show, preventing both the occasional catastrophic misfires and the occasional classics. There are quite a few fairly good episodes ("Author Author," "Repentance," "Critical Care," "The Void," each installment of both two-parters), tons of mediocre ones, and only a couple outright flops ("Friendship One" and "Unimatrix Zero Part 2", both overrated here at 2.5 stars).

It's a very distinct 7th Season from the two other Trek series that have one. TNG was running out of ideas, churning out episodes of a huge range of quality. DS9 attempted to do a whole lot with a new character and a ten-part finale, to varying degrees of success. Voyager S7 just felt like more Voyager, competent and rarely challenging.

Looking back, the peak of the show was from "Before and After" through "Tinker Tenor Doctor Spy," roughly Season 3.75-Season 6.2. The end of Season 3 had a huge upward surge in quality, Season 4 shook up the status quo and took the most risks, Season 5 executed stories within that new status quo the most effectively, and Season 6 started with a random string of strong episodes. That made for a thrilling run of television, and almost all the Voyager episodes I revisit are within it.
Baron Samedi
Wed, Apr 18, 2018, 11:39am (UTC -6)
I want to note one overlooked quality that I think Season 7 did brilliantly. As the earlier seasons focused more and more on the Hologram Doctor (as well as 7 of 9) at the expense of other characters, we developed increasing sympathy for him and acceptance of him as a rights-holding member of the crew.

Season 7 built on that sentiment, even turning the tables on us at times, quite a bit in "Critical Care," "Author, Author," and "Flesh and Blood." The final moments of "Author, Author" showing at least dozens of Doctors in a mine conjure up another reference to TNG's "Measure of a Man," as we see the slavery Picard and Guinan feared would result from the a denial of Data's rights. If we accept the EMH as deserving of some rights, then what we're seeing is abhorrent injustice, precisely the result we happily saw defeated for androids in "Measure of a Man". "Flesh and Blood" also carries that idea of the EMH as deserving rights to a logical conclusion - if they have rights, then the EMH's betrayal of Voyager is valid and even moral, as the endless suffering of the hologram Hirogen hunting ground victims constitutes a perfectly valid reason for them to fight back and kill living beings in the process.

Of course, the solution to all of this may very well be to deny the EMH any rights whatsoever, but we've developed so much sympathy for him as a character over the past seven years that we don't want to. But it may be the right thing to do. I'm not sure I'd rule the same way as the presiding judge in "Measure of a Man," and I'm not sure I'd rule the way the arbitrator does in "Author, Author". Because, fundamentally, I don't think either Data or the EMG have consciousness, and I like how Voyager Season 7 cleverly suggests that we at least consider that we might have been wrong to care about the Doctor all along. Although, ultimately, I think it comes down on the side of giving some advanced holograms some limited rights, which opens a massive can of worms, but an understandable one that I don't think the show needs to explore any further than it did.
William B
Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 5:54am (UTC -6)
You know what, I'm going to do the season-end thing EXCEPT FOR ENDGAME now. Endgame is its own kettle o' fish.

Ratings, with difference from Jammer's rating in parentheses:

Unimatrix Zero Part 2: 1.5 (-1)
Imperfection: 3 (=)
Drive: 2.5 (=)
Repression: 1 (-0.5)
Critical Care: 2.5 (-0.5)
Inside Man: 1.5 (-0.5)
Body and Soul: 2.5 (-0.5)
Nightingale: 1.5 (-0.5)
Flesh and Blood: 3.5 (=)
Shattered: 2 (=)
Lineage: 4 (+0.5) (yes really -- it resonates with me in a personal way)
Prophesy: 1.5 (-0.5)
The Void: 3 (=)
Workforce Part 1: 3.5 (=)
Workforce Part 2: 3 (=)
Human Error: 2.5 (+0.5)
Q2: 1 (-0.5)
Author, Author: 4 (=)
Friendship One: 1.5 (-1)
Natural Law: 1 (-1)
Homestead: 2.5 (-0.5)
Renaissance Man: 2.5 (=)

So this averages to 2.4 or so, which isn't terrible, and there are a number of very good shows. The season also has something like arcs in the Holographic Rights material, the Paris/Torres story and in the crew's increasing connection to home, and both the midseason two-parters are good. Neelix gets a mostly good send-off, as well. On the minus side: Tuvok is pretty badly neglected and his one show, Repression, is particularly bad; the Seven material seems to mostly dry up after Imperfection, with Human Error not quite working and Natural Law being a near-total waste, losing out on one of the usually strong links; and some of the characters have either no final statements or a limp, almost pointless one (Nightingale for Kim, Shattered for Chakotay). The movement toward slightly greater serialization happens a bit too late to have a lot of impact except in terms of the Doctor and Paris/Torres (especially Torres) and there is an awful lot of chaff or sleepwalking shows. I'd say that overall, I'd recommend Imperfection, Flesh and Blood, Lineage, The Void, Workforce, and Author, Author, and that's only 7 stories, though admittedly it amounts to 9 when we count two of them as two-parters; there are, however, a lot of semi-successful eps in the 2.5-star range, including eps like Homestead, which is basically successful in its primary goal and it's just the material around it that brings it down. It's Voyager, I guess, which means it's consistently inconsistent and disappointing, with glimmers of the better show it could have been -- but enough to keep me interested, despite the negative tone I get when talking about it. We'll see how Endgame plays for me this time around.
Tue, Nov 20, 2018, 11:12pm (UTC -6)
Though I hope someday to do a rewatch and more commenting, who knows when or if that can happen, so some "final" comments on Voyager:

I think any series like this one, with limited budget and a weekly production schedule, and the usual inconsistencies with actors and directors and writers, can be mercilessly picked apart.

OR any series like this one, with great production values, some excellent actors and characters and writers, directors, etc, can be lovingly portrayed and talked up.

I love Voyager. It's flaws seem no different, no better or worse, than all the Treks. They committed more of offense X, but less of Y, than other Trek series? Eh, who knows. I'm not going to count.

And which offenses are the most egregious? Is the frequent reset button worse than frequent horrible acting in a key role, e.g.? Well, that's hard to quantify and would be a very individual call.

Voyager's major plusses:

--Excellent actress (Mulgrew) as lead, as well as great performance by Ryan, Picardo, Russ, and Dawson (in that order).

--Some of the best characters in Trekdom with Doc, Seven, Janeway, and that excellent Vulcan, Tuvok.

--The first female Captain, which could have been hokey or overdone, but was instead very well done. Mulgrew was perfect, and I loved the risks the writers took with Janeway. She was most definitely, with zero apologies or vagaries, confident and in charge. And she loved it. They didn't hide that she loved it, or portray her love of command as a negative thing, though it had its costs. They didn't soften the blow. Risky even now, much less then.

--Fantastic production values. Some great, great stuff.

There were some truly awful eps, but not too many of those. The good was really good.

I enjoyed my journey and the destination.
William B
Wed, Nov 21, 2018, 12:01pm (UTC -6)
@Springy, it's been good to read your comments on Voyager.

I was overall sort of mixed but overall enjoyed Voyager when I rewatched it last year or so (which I hope came across in my comments, even if they often skewed negative because I sometimes found it easier to talk about what didn't work for me than what did). I'd say I liked it better than when I watched it as a teenager, I think because I sort of knew what flaws to expect (some of the characters don't really get much development, especially Kim and Chakotay, some episodes are particularly bad, especially things like Threshold and Spirit Folk) and didn't let them bother me that much, generally. I also had a better chance to appreciate how good Melgrew was in the role. While I recognized how great Picardo and Ryan were when I was younger, Melgrew (and to a degree Russ, whose unshowy perfection I took for granted) flew under my radar.
Mon, Oct 28, 2019, 7:56pm (UTC -6)
Hello Everyone!

I was thinking about how they knew the series was ending, but finished it with one episode. Only Neelix got a sendoff. I still believe they missed the boat, not having something like, oh, at least a two or three episode arc, with the last half of the last one showing them getting acclimated to Earth again. I had forgotten how there were no episodes, apart from Neelix's, that allowed us to say goodbye, if even for a few moments.

I'd read a few comments over the years about them wanting episodes to be somewhat self-contained, for the casual viewer. I understand that can help if just sitting down to watch one now, but if any show screamed for continuity, it was this one. And back in the day, I didn't know any casual viewers, or any who said they watched it here and there to see a catsuit. It was all or nothing. Nearly everyone I knew who watched it, recorded it to VHS for their collection.

While there were characters I enjoyed, watching a few shows a week made me realize how some of them just had too many episodes dedicated to them. I liked Doctor and Seven, but believe they went to the well a few too many times. Also, there were no characters I truly disliked. They just "were" and I, along with my buddies, accepted them as-is. None of the folks I talked Trek with ever mentioned they hated this or that character, but we all had ones we liked a bit better.

Eh, I think that's about it for now. Thanks, again, Jammer for the wonderful site.

Take care... RT
Wed, Nov 6, 2019, 9:26am (UTC -6)
People are always saying that Voyager wasn't very good, but it miles ahead of shows like Enterprise or Discovery. I never watched them, but from what I heard, their best episodes were just good, compared to Voyager's best of episodes like "Living Witness" or Tinker Tenor. Or maybe it's just that the Doc is awesome.

Another complaint is that it has little to no episodic qualities. While that is true in the first couple seasons, once you hit seasons 7 and, to a lesser extent, 6, you get a lot more overarching story, and the series definitely ends on a high note with "Endgame", whereas Enterprise ends with the mediocre "These are the Voyages..."
Fri, May 1, 2020, 2:17am (UTC -6)
I did it! I just watched all the Voyager!

I now feel fully qualified to say: okay. Some of it was a slog, but there were some surprisingly good parts. There was more than one episode where I thought I knew what they were doing, but they dug a little deeper into the sci-fi than I expected, and they delivered.

There aren't as many great characters as DS9, but there are a few elevated ones. It doesn't have a special place in my heart like TNG, but I'll remember a few moments with similar fondness for their storytelling and humor. It doesn't strike brand new notes like the latest shows, but the production was noticeably quality and I liked the classic feel of exploration, camaraderie, and idealism.

Star Trek may benefit from the pizza rule, even when it's not that great it's still better than most. I'll raise a toast to Voyager.
Thu, May 28, 2020, 1:57pm (UTC -6)
Wanted to put down some overall thoughts on VOY (not just Season 7) having gone thru it at least a half-dozen times...

Bottom line is I like it for what it is and its place in classic Trek. No, it doesn't have many all-time great episodes for me like TOS, TNG, DS9 do but I think it managed to carve out its own territory and I can understand why it will be some people's favorite Trek.

But as many have said, and I particularly like Skeptical's comments (as usual, one of the best contributors to this forum), VOY could have been so much more. Contrast this with TOS which achieved so much with so little. VOY starts with a terrific premise of a Federation/Maquis crew stranded in the DQ trying to find their way home. The production values were great, the VFX solid, and VOY really swung for the fences with episodes like "Scorpion" and some of the other 2-parters, but in most cases the writing didn't hold up its end of the bargain.

I think the problem with VOY is that it didn't take enough risks and was content to basically be a happy-go-lucky crew wandering home and not shaking up the status quo. Way too many reset buttons, hard-headed aliens of the week, contrivances, head-scratchers (like I thought we had seen the last of the Malon/Borg/Vidiians etc.) and ultimately inconsequential action scenes are the hallmark of VOY for me.

But I think VOY managed to do certain things better than most if not all other Treks. No other cast felt as tight-knit to me as VOY's. Having a female captain and given Voyager's specific predicament, I think Janeway's concern for her crew (motherly instincts) was something unique to VOY. I also think that when VOY went for humor, it really came up with some winners -- Doc and 7 have a lot of dimensions to their characters and they developed from the exact opposite, which was fun to see over the seasons.

As for the cast, I think it's middle of the road as far as Trek series go, but it is one we can grow to appreciate and that’s what really made watching VOY in seasons 6 & 7 enjoyable. I think every cast member except Wang is at least average in relation to other Treks main cast but the Doc and 7 of 9 really stood out as the best VOY characters. Ryan and Mulgrew are the best actors in the series, though I wish the writers had done better with Janeway in terms of making her less arbitrary in her decision-making.

The “Borg episodes” were some of the better ones overall for me. One can argue about violating the integrity of the Borg or de-clawing the Borg, but more often than not, we got pretty good hours of TV out of it. I actually think one of the best things VOY did was introduce Species 8472 in “Scorpion” simply to make the Borg face a superior foe and where that leads. But then VOY took a wrong step with Species 8472 with “In the Flesh”. I’ve never been a fan of the Borg Queen but if VOY wanted to keep going back to the Borg honey hole, then this is what happens — gotta come up with new tricks.

I’ve said before that I think VOY’s 1st season was among the best debut seasons for any Trek series. The themes were fresh, the writing good, and I guess it hadn’t degenerated into what felt like just cranking out episodes (writer fatigue). But in the latter seasons, VOY could still come up with some very compelling episodes touching on ethics, character development, and real world themes — it depended on the execution which was hit and miss.

I don’t know if VOY was intended to be a sort of antithesis of DS9, but it kind of felt that way to me. Another possible take on that is that DS9 went out with a bang, but VOY went out with a whimper. I’d blame this on the writers and this probably bled into ENT that started with 2 mediocre seasons before really swinging for the fences in Season 3 and hitting a home run. ENT took a risk and it paid off, VOY preferred to play it safe the whole way through.

But I will take an average VOY episode any day over an average nu-Trek episode!

Just to end, my top 5 and bottom 5 VOY episodes:

1. Scorpion 9.5/10
2. Prey 9.5/10
3. Drone 9.5/10
4. Prime Factors 9.5/10
5. One Small Step 9/10

1. Threshold 1/10
2. Sprit Folk 1.5/10
3. Favorite Son 1.5/10
4. Q2 1.5/10
5. Demon 2/10
Sat, May 30, 2020, 12:06pm (UTC -6)
Always fun to do and I see that I didn't do it here.

Here are my VOY 4.0 episodes: (31 of them!)

Eye of the Needle
State of Flux
The 37's
Death Wish
The Thaw
Sacred Ground
Real Life
Distant Origin
Scorpion Part I
Scientific Method
Living Witness
Infinite Regress
Bride of Chaotica
Dark Frontier
Course: Oblivion
Someone to Watch Over Me
Tinker, Tenor, Doctor, Spy
Blink of an Eye
Child's Play
Author, Author

My 1.0 and below episodes: (15 of these)

False Profits
Favorite Son
Mortal Coil
The Killing Game
Nothing Human
The Fight
Unimatrix Zero I&II
Spirit Folk

A struggle for sure to limit it to my top 5, but here it is:

1. Counterpoint
2. Scorpion
3. Death Wish
4. Blink of an Eye
5. Distant Origin

My bottom 5: (not so hard)

1. The Fight
2. Fury
3. Q2
4. False Prophets
5. Favorite Son
Tue, Jul 14, 2020, 8:13am (UTC -6)
Voyager’s final season was, overall, far better than TNG’s seventh. Similar number of great episodes, but way fewer shockingly boring phoned in episodes like “Masks.”

I find Voyager way better now than when it was first run. When first run, it felt like— and was— mostly reheated leftover TNG. But add in 20+ years of distance of no new TNG, and it plays a lot better.

Voyager should have a disclaimer “abandon all continuity ye who enter here.” The lack of continuity was a deep flaw because Trekkers have long been deeply concerned with continuity. But the upshot now with streaming is you can pretty much watch any random episode and not feel lost. It really just boils down to Kes vs Seven timeframe.
Jason R.
Tue, Jul 14, 2020, 9:08am (UTC -6)
"Voyager’s final season was, overall, far better than TNG’s seventh. Similar number of great episodes, but way fewer shockingly boring phoned in episodes like “Masks.”"

Haha say anything else you like about Masks but "phoned in"? From where? Someone's acid trip maybe?

I always give shows credit for ambition and guts even when they fall flat on their faces. Masks is a failure but an ambitious one.

It's a bit like Threshold. It may have a well deserved zero star rating but I'd rather watch it than the equally rated Shades of Grey any day of the week.
Tue, Jul 28, 2020, 4:58am (UTC -6)
Favorite Voyager episodes:

10. Persistence Of Vision
9. The Voyager Conspiracy
8. Gravity
7. Future's End
6. Someone To Watch Over Me
5. Warlord
4. Retrospect
3. Resistance
2. Counterpoint
1. The Thaw

Least favorite Voyager episodes:

10. Q2
9. The Q And The Grey
8. The Fight
7. Fair Haven
6. Spirit Folk
5. Inside Man
4. Fury
3. Dark Frontier
2. Endgame
1. Unimatrix Zero
Cody B
Wed, Jul 29, 2020, 8:47am (UTC -6)

I don’t keep track of my least favorites (I have “good” and “great” list) but here’s my top Voyager episodes in chronological order

Resistance, Death Wish, Lifesigns, Futures End, Mortal Coul, Message In a Bottle, Living Witness, Someone To Watch Over Me, 11:59, Barge of the Dead, Tinker Tenor Doctor Spy, Lineage, Author Author, Endgame.

I know I have a few in there that not everyone would agree on and some left out that are most likely on my “good” list but those are the episodes I wrote down for giving me that good old fuzzy feeling right after watching :)
Edmund Bloxam
Mon, Mar 8, 2021, 8:11pm (UTC -6)
Somebody's still here watching 'Voyager'.

I used to love this show, and I thought Season Five was a peak of individual stories. When I first watched the show, I thought Season Six fell off a cliff of quality. I therefore hadn't watched until the last few months.

Quite extremely, then, watching S6 and 7 was like watching them all over again. And the individual stories, for the most part, were pretty good. Every story ever is a 'relationship story', so, yes, about time on Tom and Torres. I agree with the consensus. But considering that my expectations were for the dreck that was 'Enterprise' (Man, that show was so...damn...uneventful and boring), and 'Discovery' is just utterly ridiculous and messy and bloated and gets basic emotion wrong and fucki*g dumb, I was glad of basic storytelling competence.

Also, the critics of 'Voyager' miss that it came before serialised television, in effect. 'B5' was garbage, literal garbage, so the only shows that committed to real consequences were soap operas. Whilst, in the end, 'Voyager' suffers from this, S3 or TNG is indistinguishable from S7 and people cringingly love that show, so complaining about 'Voyager' is just a double standard. I find Voyager much more watchable than that show, even if I agree with most of the consensus.
Mon, Mar 8, 2021, 10:12pm (UTC -6)
@Edmund Bloxam
"Also, the critics of 'Voyager' miss that it came before serialised television, in effect. 'B5' was garbage, literal garbage, so the only shows that committed to real consequences were soap operas"

I'm sure someone else will point out that this is factually wrong (I'll leave it to another to list all the serialized shows that came before VOY) but I do want to add my own opinion that the garbage 'B5' is better than any and all of the Trek shows, old and new. Though I don't expect that opinion to be popular on a Trek review site such as this.
Bob (a different one)
Tue, Mar 9, 2021, 3:17pm (UTC -6)
I only got around to watching this show a couple of decades after it went off the air. After my first complete watch of Voyager I found 57 episodes that I liked. Not great, but it was nice to find almost 60 new Trek episodes to watch.

A few years later I did a partial rewatch with my father. He wasn't crazy about the show, and I found that a few of the episodes that I initially thought were good weren't so hot.

Second Watch Subtractions:

Caretaker (I)
Caretaker (II)

A week ago I started another partial rewatch, sticking to my list of "good" episodes. Well, things didn't go very well. 15 more episodes get added to my "skip" list.

Third Watch Subtractions:

Time and Again
The Chute
The Swarm
Day of Honor
The Raven
Scientific Method
The Killing Game (I)
The Killing Game (II)
Dark Frontier (I)
Dark Frontier (II)
Dragon's Teeth
Flesh and Blood (I)
Flesh and Blood (II)

So, now I'm down to 38 episodes. It's probably going to be a long time before I revisit this show.

Anyways...of the ones that I do like, these are some of my favorites:

Living Witness
Blink of an Eye
Someone to Watch Over Me
One Small Step
Body and Soul
Survival Instinct
Barge of the Dead
Infinite Regress
Year of Hell
Sun, Mar 28, 2021, 9:43am (UTC -6)
With 7 of 9 and Janeway both coming back for new Star Trek series (Picard & Prodigy) I decided to give VOY a new chance. I never liked it in its first run, was a diehard ds9 fan. I think that after 20 years, i can “have my cake and eat it”. I really enjoyed it, even with its plot holes (as big as craters). I found the characters charming and grew to understand Janeway’s decision. They used to enfuriate me!
All in all, if you are willing to just enjoy the ride, VOY surely provides a good journey
Sun, Jul 18, 2021, 1:03am (UTC -6)
I grew up watching TOS and fell in love with sci-fi. Since then I’ve rewatched the original countless times. I didn’t think I’d ever like another Trek show any more than TOS and its characters (Spok being my favorite). Then came TNG and I fell in love with that one just the same, even though it felt like cheating on my first love. And then came Voyager. The reason why I wanted to add a comment here is this: Voyager became my all-time favorite for so many reasons. Yes, sure, there are still some isolated TNG or TOS episodes which I might like better, but Voyager has my heart. So let me shock you with my unpopular opinions: Janeway is a fantastic Starfleet captain and my favorite Trek character. I loved the holodeck episodes. I really liked Neelix. I enjoyed episodes that were stand-alone and didn’t care whether they contributed to the series progression. I’m glad that it doesn’t have tons of religious undertones (unlike DS9). I loved Tuvix, but absolutely agreed that he had to separate again. Anyway, live long and prosper, y’all. :)
Wed, Oct 27, 2021, 9:41pm (UTC -6)
It's weird coming back to Voyager in the 2020s. I used to hate this show, and I still think it isn't very good. It has good episodes and some great characters with terrific performances, but the show abandoned its concept and any kind of identity early on. However, after the horrible ST: Discovery and the abysmal ST:Picard, I realize that even the most terrible episodes of Voyager are vastly more fun than anything new Trek has to show. New Trek made me value these weaker shows more and made it clear to me what I like about Star Trek - something Discovery and Picard are missing.
Latex Zebra
Thu, Oct 28, 2021, 3:23am (UTC -6)
Strange New Worlds is going to be a big test. To see if they actually capture the more episodic 1 hour adventure in space vibe of Trek of old and how modern audiences that like serialized TV will accept it.
Jason R.
Thu, Oct 28, 2021, 7:14am (UTC -6)
@Latex Zebra

Chances of that happening = 0.0
Latex Zebra
Thu, Oct 28, 2021, 7:50am (UTC -6)
@Jason R.

Haha. Yes. I will give it a go though. It has potential to be decent. Lower Decks has pleasantly surprised so hoping this will too.
Bok R'Mor
Thu, Oct 28, 2021, 8:46am (UTC -6)

'However, after the horrible ST: Discovery and the abysmal ST:Picard, I realize that even the most terrible episodes of Voyager are vastly more fun than anything new Trek has to show. New Trek made me value these weaker shows more and made it clear to me what I like about Star Trek - something Discovery and Picard are missing.'

Yes, completely agree.
Jason R.
Thu, Oct 28, 2021, 8:47am (UTC -6)
Guaranteed it will be another mystery box "fate of the galaxy / universe" plot. Guaranteed.
Wed, Sep 13, 2023, 1:39pm (UTC -6)
@Bok R'Mor

At least PIC season 3 was decent

Submit a comment

I agree to the terms of use

◄ Season Index

▲Top of Page | Menu | Copyright © 1994-2023 Jamahl Epsicokhan. All rights reserved. Unauthorized duplication or distribution of any content is prohibited. This site is an independent publication and is not affiliated with or authorized by any entity or company referenced herein. Terms of use.