Comment Stream

Search and bookmark options Close
Search for:
Search by:
Clear bookmark | How bookmarks work
Note: Bookmarks are ignored for all search results

Total Found: 7 (Showing 1-7)

Page 1 of 1
Set Bookmark
Tobias
Mon, Oct 19, 2020, 5:52pm (UTC -5)
Re: DS9 S3: The Search, Part II

My take on the inclusion of Garak is that they figured out that nobody really knew what was going on with him, so they gave him such a big role to see if they could figure it out.

Also, this episode confirmed to me that KA Applegate (author of the Animorphs) was 100% a Trekkie. Symbiotic slugs, morphing into birds...
Set Bookmark
Tobias Schaechtele
Tue, Jun 6, 2017, 8:06am (UTC -5)
Re: ENT S1: Dear Doctor

I`d like to add something vital:

Archer himself brings up the fact, that he his judgement is not clouded by but lead by human compassion. He even bringt up the comparison with the Vulcan behaviour. For me, this was always the reason why the Federation worked so well, the Humans and their compassion and the Vulcans with their dry rationality outweight and balance each other.

But here Archer teams up with something entirely different, and I will never understand why: Phlox' Nihilism.
Set Bookmark
Tobias Schaechtele
Tue, Jun 6, 2017, 7:46am (UTC -5)
Re: ENT S1: Dear Doctor

This episode left me puzzled at first look (which basically is a good thing). As I continued to think about it and to read comments on both this site and on videos from the episode on youtube, I grew more and more angry on the writers and those understanding and supporting Phlox and Archers decision and moral argument (which I feel is not such a good thing).

It is blatantly shown here that the life of millions or even billions depend on the subjective and maybe fundamentally twisted mindset of two people alone. The decision of interference vs. non-interference is really to heavy a burden for a greenhorn like Archer and Phlox, which is not even an evolution specialist, is he (let alone an expert on the valerian society)? I think it is really, really not Archers decision to make (and judging by the result, he failed, too)

Why did`t they ask Starfleet or someone else for any help? Why the is there nothing like an ethics committee debating such matters? A council consisting of experts or at least representatives of the civilizations diverse points of view (this would also have made a great predecessor for the federation council btw). This is a matter where something like a social consensus HAS TO BE reached. Imagine human rights activists (or better "sentient beings right activists", as star trek tends to stupidly pun on the word "human rights") hearing from the Valakians. There would have been an outrage over the Arbitrariness of this one Starfleet executive, would´t it?
Now some will argue "maybe this was actually done", as they surely reported all mission details back to starfleet - but that is not how the story sells it.

In my opinion, it would be even more realistic, and appropriate to the matter at hand, had they - after such an encounter- made a good portion of a season or at least a several episode-long story arc about a science team staying on the planet, calling for assistance, building a joined starfleet / vulcan operation with a spacedock near the Valakian home world.
But the writers decided to use the death of millions as a one episode plot device (not unlike a "Monster of the week", but more like "dying civilization of the week") - which I find distasteful. The interference vs. non-interference theme and all its implications and complications could have been easily the single main storyline of all Star Trek Enterprise. Instead, they relied on stupid xindi and nazi war stories and god-awful temporal shenanigans. But that is another story (And yes, when you think about it, Star Trek does this all the time, but that shows, although Storytelling evolved, Enterprise was pretty much lazy and tired).

The whole thing is based on so damn much speculations. You can`t just base the deception on the speculation of the menks becoming the master race. They state is almost as a fact (as Phlox explains, that evolution is a fact…), but I render this plain wrong under the presented circumstances and context.
As for Archer withholding warp technology. I give em that, this seems reasonable - we all know that a not so peaceful civilisation could use them to build antimatter bombs etc.
But literally no other variables where taken into account.
Just take a look of other not so unlikely things to happen:
- For crying out loud, the Klingons could well coquer the Valakian home world, because the Valakians are getting to weak to defend themselves, and the Menk are not yet capable to "help them out" / replace them (or in a slight variation: "…Oh look ….the Borg assimilated the Valakian Homeworld… there goes the Menks opportunity for "greatness").
- They are developing their own warp drive, so the Menk and/or the Valakians decide to move on to other planets, rendering the whole concept of "one race must die so the other can expand" useless
- The Menk and the Valakians may manage not only continue their peacefull coexistence in the next 200 years, but to overcome the 'apartheid' entirely. Sorry, I will be forced to use some racist vocabulary here: Imagine some Aliens landing in the US and looking down on the supreme white race oppressing the black community. They theorize the white master race is going to die out because of their decadence, thus enabling the black community to rise - not taking into account that the 'apartheid' on fine day some 200 years later will cease to exist.
See my point?

Let me add something: Even if you take some of Phlox and Archers esoteric mumbo jumbo "nature decides" BS into account, you also have to think about the technological evolution. They actually developed the technology to make contact with warp civilizations by sending ships out into space. So basically, the evolution of their brain enabled them to get the sciene right and to reach out and ask for help …. for crying out loud!
Which leads me to the whole PD concept of "non-interference with pre-warp civilizations" being like drawing a really, really arbitrary line in the sand (which is not the fault of Enterprise…). What tells us that a civilization is ready for first contact only because they can fly FTL? What if they instead develop subspace communication? Imagine the egyptians miraculously developing warp technology (which, in the realms of the star trek universe, would not be the most unlikely thing to happen…)? When exactly in earths history where humans morally fully equipped to deal with the rapid progress of technology? Surely not today, or in the mids of the eugenics wars. There is and should always be a moral struggle, even with making contact with warp-civilizations. And some of the pre-warp civilizations maybe far more ready to make contact with other species and getting help than the most of the feudal, conquering, slave-trading warp-civilizations we have seen so far.

BTW: I also despise the whole "Playing god" and "let nature decides" argument (which I feel are sides of the same coin). Citing a higher power is always a cheap way out of the "moral dilemma" presented here.
Set Bookmark
Tobias
Mon, Feb 1, 2016, 1:18pm (UTC -5)
Re: VOY S3: False Profits

Let me make this brief, because I completely agree with almost every single aspect of the review. There is just one bit of criticism that I cannot resist the urge to refuse:

"What kills me is that [...] the inhabitants of this planet are dumb enough to accept them as their real Sages. All these Ferengi do all day is sit around and con the citizens out of their money. Would a real society accept this, even from their supposed gods?"

The first thing that came to my mind was the obscene wealth of the Vatican or the Church of Scientology and so on, but I think a much better (and less controversial) example is that of Peter Popoff, a televangelist who made millions in the eighties, was proven to be a complete and utter fraud on national TV by James Randi (please watch it on youtube, it's hilarious), then made a comeback in 1998 and has again been raking in that sweet, tax-exempt (!) donation money to this very day. That's how dumb real 21st century humanity is when it comes to belief. And we are talking about someone who looks exactly like everyone else ,who has not literally come from the stars like the Ferengi have in this episode and whose "miracles" have been debunked more than once, unlike the replicator.

Sorry I haven't managed to keep it brief and thanks for the (otherwise) spot-on review.
Set Bookmark
Tobias
Tue, Jan 6, 2015, 11:35pm (UTC -5)
Re: VOY S7: Friendship One

-Here's where it gets really bad
9. Voyager saves the day by clearing up the weather by shooting *photon torpedos*. First this is technobabble that makes no sense, second it looks like an attack giving the aliens a chance to react, and third, it just so happens to risk the ship to add Danger (TM)
10. Despite the entire episode showing the too black/white world of humans good, aliens bad, Janeway comes to the opposite conclusion that humans are bad for daring to explore
11. This exploration, remote spacecraft exploration, is somehow evil compared to Voyagers exploration, MANNED expeditions to "seek out new life and boldly go where no man has gone before."
12. The producers make it clear that Janeway is not experiencing a character flaw (what is a character flaw in Voyager?), but by various characters throughout the episode, that the message of the week is Exploration is Evil. Now keep in mind they aren't just saying it's dangerous, they flat out claim that exploration is evil through statements such as "the early humans didn't know what they were doing, they were less civilized back then and didn't have the prime directive" and "what if they had found the Borg? The human race would have been assimilated"

The biggest difference between what happened and what should have happened is the theme. The theme it had is that humans are good, but that through the evils of exploration they are evil...somehow. Instead the episode should have subtly shown that humans can accidentally do great evil but that we must explore despite the risks.
Set Bookmark
Tobias
Tue, Jan 6, 2015, 11:34pm (UTC -5)
Re: VOY S7: Friendship One

...continued
Set Bookmark
Tobias
Tue, Jan 6, 2015, 11:34pm (UTC -5)
Re: VOY S7: Friendship One

After watching this episode I am again frustrated by the standard Voyager way of plot and characters that make this show so mediocre. As I watched, I came up with an alternate plot that is far more interesting:

First third - Voyager goes to the planet and finds the probe, similar to the episode. NO ALIEN appears, instead they make their way back to the ship. Harry Kim goes to Janeway and asks her not to leave the planet just yet. Astonished she asks why and he replies that he wants to investigate what happened on the planet. When she disagrees, Seven points out that the probe could have had an impact on the planet.

Middle third - They return to the planet (more cool nuclear winter scenes) and split up. They each find various records shown in flashbacks. One person finds a little girl's video diary, another a father watching his children die with the planet, and finally a third finds official records about the science experiments that went wrong.

Final third - They return to Voyager, realizing that Earth caused this entire planet to die. The final third focuses on a debate - should they tell Starfleet the truth or actually lie and cover it up? Tom Paris argues to lie, as he was deeply inspired by Friendship One (he built a model afterall) and feels that Earth will be afraid to explore if they learn the truth. Tuvok argues that lying to Starfleet would be inexcusable, and covering up a tragedy would not be the right thing to do. Janeway hears both sides, and decides to tell the truth, but adds that exploration has consequences and this must be realized. She says that humanity will continue to explore, despite better knowing the risks.

Note that in my version, NO ALIENS appear. In the episode, what happens instead is:
1. aliens on a "dead" planet appear.
2. the scanners must have malfunctioned
3. aliens kidnap the crew
4. Voyager captures an alien
5. The captured alien is shown kindness and healed, turned to their side
6. One of the hostages helps the aliens, saves a baby, further showing how Voyager are the good guys.
7. The Hard Headed alien accuses Voyager of being evil purely by association
8. The aliens kill a hostage in cold blood, showing how evil they are
Page 1 of 1
▲Top of Page | Menu | Copyright © 1994-2021 Jamahl Epsicokhan. All rights reserved. Unauthorized duplication or distribution of any content is prohibited. This site is an independent publication and is not affiliated with or authorized by any entity or company referenced herein. Terms of use.