Comment Stream

Search and bookmark options Close
Search for:
Search by:
Clear bookmark | How bookmarks work
Note: Bookmarks are ignored for all search results

Total Found: 23 (Showing 1-23)

Page 1 of 1
Set Bookmark
Tue, May 5, 2020, 2:07pm (UTC -5) | 🔗
Re: TOS S3: Turnabout Intruder

I have to laugh at the SJW who call sexism because Starfleet doesn't have female captains. Hello, the Federation is a MILITARY organisation. In all societies in all ages, it's men who go to war, with a few capable and heroic women thrown in, but nevertheless, a man's business. Because women are smaller and weaker and many many many of them prefer a comfortable home and children, to going off to dangerous and possibly fatal expeditions. Besides, we want people promoted due to capabilities not due to gender, to fill out quotas. Everybody who thinks the military would benefit from more women (by the way, I am one) should watch Redonkulous Can't Cut the Mustard on Youtube.
Set Bookmark
Tue, May 5, 2020, 1:01pm (UTC -5) | 🔗
Re: TOS S3: Elaan of Troyius

I was reminded of this woman with The Final Frontier, did anybody else notice the similarity between this actress and the woman they met in the prison camp?
Set Bookmark
Thu, Apr 23, 2020, 4:21am (UTC -5) | 🔗
Re: TOS S1: Arena

"Arena" is a classic, and the best part is, having seen this episode then watching Galaxy Quest. When the captain is fighting the Rock Monster, Guy shouts, "Can't you make a rudimentary lathe?" and I lost it, too funny.
Set Bookmark
Tue, Sep 24, 2019, 2:43pm (UTC -5) | 🔗
Re: TOS S1: Where No Man Has Gone Before

How are you calling this and the Cage pilots? The pilot is The Menagerie, with a different captain. Later made into episodes featuring the old captain in flashbacks.
Set Bookmark
Tue, Sep 24, 2019, 1:53pm (UTC -5) | 🔗
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi

I have thoroughly enjoyed your reviews, but I am floored you like TLJ. You're an English major and a sci-fi story expert, and you give this plot-hole-ridden suckfest more than half a star? It wrecked all the lore, uses the Force illegitimately, and is heavily SJW politicized -- the men in this movie were all physically and verbally abused by women! The horrid just will not cease.
Rey is a Mary Sue and her action figures aren't selling, that should tell you volumes. I think you need to watch the Mauler reviews and adjust that score.
And since I'm writing anyway, P.S., it's spelled, "dialogue" :)
Set Bookmark
Sat, Jan 26, 2019, 7:36am (UTC -5) | 🔗
Re: ORV S2: All the World Is Birthday Cake

Overall a fairly original scifi premise. The Orville does infinitely better when it executes new concepts instead of ripping off startrek episodes, the exception being Mad Idolatry which was well done.

My only problem is that during their escape, Kelly and Bortus killed several of the guards and destroyed property. Even if the original reason for their captivity no longer applied, surely they should be held on murder charges.
Set Bookmark
Tue, Aug 18, 2015, 6:52pm (UTC -5) | 🔗
Re: TNG S5: The Next Phase

"Still, when Geordi tells Data that Data lacks imagination, when Geordi is going around pushing random parts of the table again and again, I want to throttle the guy. How about writing "GEORDI" in big letters on the console with his finger? How about punching out prime number patterns on the console? Geordi has a chance to communicate and he mostly doesn't do anything that looks like a careful, intelligent pattern."

YES! In general I liked this episode, but that scene was almost unbearable to watch. Especially when Geordi is like, "Data, stop being so rational!" Um, Geordi, maybe you should start being rational and try to get his attention in a way that isn't easily interpreted as sensor malfunction...
Set Bookmark
Sun, Aug 16, 2015, 8:18pm (UTC -5) | 🔗
Re: TNG S5: Imaginary Friend

This episode almost felt like it was trying to be "The Twilight Zone" and falling compleely flat. The little girl playing Clara did draw me in though, so with that and Data's bunny rabbit comment, 1.5 stars seems fair.
Set Bookmark
Sun, Aug 16, 2015, 3:42pm (UTC -5) | 🔗
Re: TNG S5: Cost of Living

When I first started watching this episode I was surprised by how well Lwaxana and Alexander worked together, though confused by why on earth an episode would focus on that pairing. Then they arrived at the holodeck Land of Oz...

I stand by my fondness for Lwaxana, though, despite the fact that many of her plotlines (including in this episode) are horrendous. Her mannerisms remind me of women I know in real life, believe it or not, and I just love the way Picard and Deanna act when she's around. (Those are among the few occasions I find Deanna tolerable.)
Set Bookmark
Sun, Aug 16, 2015, 2:25pm (UTC -5) | 🔗
Re: TNG S5: Cause and Effect

I honestly think it's pretty clear why Data chose "3" as the message instead of a word, but in order to understand it, you have to think like Data.

First, and most importantly, he needed to pick a message that he could readily subconsciously insert into his day before the collision. This is why a number like "3" was preferable to a word like "Riker" - he needed something that could apply in multiple situations (e.g. the card game, the sensor readings, etc.) and that would be noticeable to others beside himself (i.e. him dealing threes at the game as opposed to him wondering why he keeps thinking about Riker, lol) in order to establish a clear motif and ensure that the message wouldn't be passed off as coincidence.

Second, Data realized that in order for the message to be effective, it would preferably *not* be understood until the final, critical moment. Why? Because the message would only work to prevent a collision if the events immediately leading up to the collision remained more-or-less the same. Suppose, for instance, that the message had been "Riker" and that the crew had realized this. How might that have affected Riker's decision-making, and therefore the order of events? Perhaps he would have second-guessed himself and provided he wrong solution in this loop. In short, when Data was programming the message, knowing that he could single-handedly avoid the collision in the next loop using Riker's suggestion *so long as the scenario played out essentially the same,* he realized the clue need only be something that he would understand, and even then only at the critical moment. In fact, it was preferable that it remain a complete mystery to everyone else until he explained himself after the fact.

Fortunately for the crew, Data could think this fast even when he was about to be destroyed in a horrible explosion. :p
Set Bookmark
Sun, Aug 16, 2015, 10:50am (UTC -5) | 🔗
Re: TNG S5: Power Play

I love any time Brent Spiner gets to play angry on the show, and like others, I'm impressed by how clearly differentiated his acting in this episode is from his characterization of Lore. I was also really impressed by Sirtis here. This episode really goes to show how much better Troi could have been if she had had been written as a consistently competent officer with more leadership skills and less of a tendency toward stating the obvious.

As SkepticalMI said above, I find possessed-O'Brien's characterization to be a little off compared to the other two. This was more than made up for by Keiko, though, who was remarkably strong in an incredibly trying situation and showed her commitment to the best interests of both her child and her ship.
Set Bookmark
Sat, Aug 15, 2015, 9:02pm (UTC -5) | 🔗
Re: TNG S5: A Matter of Time

Daniel Davis: "So all he has to do is just find his way back to New Jersey and get back in the timeship and he's back in business. And chances are, at some point he'll have access to a replicator and so be able to remake all things the Enterprise crew indignantly took back from him."

Actually, unless I blinked and missed it, I don't think they *did* take the objects back (other than the phaser). After Rassmusen and Data exit the pod, Data does say to Picard, "I believe you will find all of the missing items in the vessel, sir." However, no one is shown entering the vessel. It is possible that someone (perhaps Worf) went inside and emerged offscreen, but when the camera cuts back to the whole group as the pod disappears, the objects are nowhere in sight. I don't see anywhere an entire tray full of stolen items could have been stashed, especially in a century without pockets. :p

So if I'm correct, Rassmusen did successfully steal the technology (albeit deactivated technology). He just has to get back to New Jersey to retrieve it.
Set Bookmark
Sat, Aug 15, 2015, 5:45pm (UTC -5) | 🔗
Re: TNG S5: The Game

I tend to agree with Pat - my problem with this episode was definitely not Wesley. I actually rather enjoyed Wesley in this one - his conversation with Data at the beginning of the episode was amusing, and his interactions with Robin were entertaining and often adorable.

What frustrates me most about this episode is that for once, a Wesley-saves-the-day plotline *could* have played out in a plausible way, based on the premise that if some addictive, brain-washing device/substance/activity were spreading on-board the Enterprise, it would be more noticeable and alarming to an outsider arriving suddenly than to those who had gradually grown accustomed. Furthermore, I felt that the "solution" to the brain-washing was actually well-handled; Wesley knew enough to analyze the problem and to repair Data, and Data handled the saving-the-day from there.

For me the problem was in the details of the addictive, brain-washing device/activity - "the game." Like some other commenters, I really don't understand how Picard was convinced to play, unless Riker, Troi, and Beverly pinned him down (in which case I wish we could have actually seen that scene...). Also, as Jay points out, "being one of the first few [to play] is understandable, but when, say, 50 people are walking around stoned, wouldn't person 51 be suspicious, to say nothing of Person 51?"

In short, if Etana had used a less moronic method of mind-control so that I could reasonably buy the whole crew falling for it, I would totally buy Wesley coming in as an outsider, recognizing a problem, repairing Data, and thus indirectly (!) saving the day.
Set Bookmark
Sat, Aug 15, 2015, 3:53pm (UTC -5) | 🔗
Re: TNG S5: Disaster

Apparently I'm in the minority (or maybe even alone) in finding the Picard story absolutely insufferable, but then again I prefer my Trek without children. I would have much rather have seen Picard and Beverly trapped together. (That also would have spared us from the rather pointless Beverly/Geordi storyline...)

Troi is easily my least favorite character in TNG, but I actually really enjoyed seeing her in this scenario. More to the point, I enjoyed how Ro and O'Brien reacted to her. Overall, this surprised me by being my favorite plotline of the episode.

So I guess my ideal modification of this episode's storylines would have been:

-Troi/Ro/O'Brien on the bridge (as is)
-Picard and Beverly in the turbolift
-Data and Riker saving the ship (expanded)

While I enjoyed Worf's dialogue, I agree with others that the time spent with him and Keiko in Ten Forward limited the other, meatier plots.
Set Bookmark
Sat, Aug 15, 2015, 3:01pm (UTC -5) | 🔗
Re: TNG S5: Silicon Avatar

Data: "Your son's most intense memories revolve around a young woman named Jenina."
Dr. Marr: "A girlfriend? I never knew about that. Of course, the last person he would tell would be his mother. What was she like?"
Data: "He enjoyed her kindness, her gentleness, her physical attributes..."

I have to admit, I was a little worried that Data - being Data - was going to keep talking and give the kid's mom waaaaay too much information...
Set Bookmark
Fri, Aug 14, 2015, 4:23pm (UTC -5) | 🔗
Re: TNG S4: Half a Life

I guess I'm odd in that I'm actually fond of Lwaxana and find her infinitely more interesting and entertaining than her daughter. Put another way, if I must sit through an episode focused on a Troi, I'd rather watch Lwaxana - or Deanna reacting to Lwaxana - than just Deanna.
Set Bookmark
Fri, Aug 14, 2015, 5:55am (UTC -5) | 🔗
Re: Star Trek: Nemesis

"The crew's small, intimate memorial scene is so muted that it comes across as emotionally vacant. This provides one of those rare occasions where I will argue that less is not more. Less here is actually less."

This. The intended purpose of having Data die at the end of Nemesis - aside from harkening back to Spock's sacrifice and attempting to end the film with dramatic punch - was to complete Data's character's arc by showing how human he had become (enough to give his life for his friends). However, it completely fell short.

First of all: Data's sacrifice was essentially negated by the convenient plot device of B-4 and Data transferring his essence into his "brother." Knowing that he was leaving this part of himself behind in relative safety, it was *logical* for Data to let his android body be killed by the blast in order to save Picard, whose human existence and knowledge would otherwise have been obliterated. If the scene was really meant to emphasize Data's humanity over his logic, his sacrifice should have been made less logical. Perhaps this would have been a good time to activate the emotion chip and have Data clearly override his programming due to his feelings toward Picard and the rest of the crew.

Second, if Data's death is meant to show how human he had become, we as viewers should have seen the Enterprise crew reacting as they would to a human death, e.g. as they would if it had been Picard who died. In fact, because Data is an android, the need to emphasize his friends' emotional responses to his death is almost *more* important than if a human character had died. Otherwise, you get the feeling that when it came down to it, his life as a machine was valued less than that of a flesh and blood man (Picard), and that his sacrifice was - again - simply logical. To me, the muted memorial scene on the bridge felt like a communal, resigned, "Damn, I'm going to miss him, makes sense."
Set Bookmark
Wed, Aug 12, 2015, 12:34pm (UTC -5) | 🔗
Re: TNG S4: Legacy

With regard to others' comments about Data possibly believing he and Tasha were closer than they actually were -

In another episode, Data describes the basis of his friendship with Geordi as follows: "I never knew what a friend was until I met Geordi. He spoke to me as though I were human. He treated me no differently from anyone else..."

This is, at least in my opinion, largely why Data considered Geordi his "best friend." Obviously there were other factors - they spent a lot of time together, and they shared a lot of interests, for example - but the biggest difference between Data's friendship with Geordi and, say, his friendship with Picard or Riker, is that Geordi *consistently* treats Data like a human being unless circumstances specifically call for focus to be placed on Data's mechanical properties. (Even then, Geordi often expresses some level of discomfort, such as in "A Fistful of Datas" when the panel on Data's head is open: "I must admit, Data, I never get used to seeing you like this.")

When Data had his sexual encounter with Tasha in "The Naked Now," she essentially treated him just as she would a human male (aside from inquiring about the extent of his functionality, but that's obviously a logistical concern in that moment). I think that's why Data later placed so much value on the encounter between them. When she asked him for "gentleness, and joy, and love," and in their subsequent encounter off-screen, she made feel completely accepted as fundamentally human-like, and she allowed him to participate in a particularly intimate human experience.
Set Bookmark
Sun, Aug 9, 2015, 2:58pm (UTC -5) | 🔗
Re: TNG S6: A Fistful of Datas

I actually have a theory on where the idea for a western full of Datas came from, based on one of Wil Wheaton's memories from the show:

"I was a huge Night Court nerd when I was a kid, and from time to time I would ask Brent to do this character; hearing him say "Mi llamo es 'Bob'" in his Data makeup was as hilarious to me as it was surreal.
I remember at one point around (I think) season three, Brent started making me laugh when we were shooting on the bridge, and then pretending he had nothing to do with it when I got in trouble … his go-to bit was to just look across at me and say, very quietly, "Bob," in that character's voice. It killed me every single time."


I'm guessing Wil wasn't the only one amused by Data doing a heavy accent and that this episode was conceived as a way of working it into TNG.
Set Bookmark
Thu, Mar 12, 2015, 9:06am (UTC -5) | 🔗
Re: ENT S1: Dear Doctor

Just noticed this thread deep within my favorites bar having commented long ago.

It makes me glad that there is still a discussion going on, albeit slowly.

Whilst ultimately I'm still a bit leery about the argument in the episode, I've found that it is one I've remembered.

Best course of action, sustained investigation off screen (Vulcan council of ethics, Starfleet, whatever) about the situation on the planet. Just a little line to suggest such an action would occur would make it more palatable.

I guess this does this a good case for the creation of the Prime directive, as it doesn't (necessarily) require immediate action so time is allowed to consider the matter in its entirety.

The Prime Directive of don't interfere strait away, but report back so the wider implications can be considered. Not as concise as the captain making the decision on the spot, but much more responsible.
Set Bookmark
Sun, Jan 5, 2014, 11:51pm (UTC -5) | 🔗
Re: VOY S4: Nemesis

I had three objections to this episode (rewatching all on Netflix at present); glad to see I'm not the only one:

OP: The never-ending supply of shuttles (3 in a row!) is very hard to swallow.

Robin is right in that Neelix should not have been able to offer any insight into this area/conflict. In the previous season, they had already reached the Nekrit Expanse, which marked the limit of Neelix's familiarity with that area of space. Add to that the 9500 light years that Kes threw them, and he shouldn't have known a thing about the planet or its people or its war (no, he was not limited to just ambassadorial duties; he actually was familiar with the conflict).

Elphaba, I agree that Paris's enthusiasm to go save Chakotay seemed out of place.

Love to see so many people interested in the details!!
Set Bookmark
Sat, Apr 13, 2013, 2:27pm (UTC -5) | 🔗
Re: ENT S1: Dear Doctor

@Benjamin, I am appaled at your assertion that it would be correct for archer to grow a mustache, as a fan of trek it think it would be far more appropriate that he grew a goatee.

oh yes as for the moral quandary, I find it difficult to overlook the shoddy science, as it forms the basis of the argument for witholding the cure. (incorrect science in sci-fi.... have never seen this before).
Strangly I wish i could agree with our disturbed captain and doctor, if for no other reason than i'd enjoy to be put ill at ease with their conclusion, however I cannot accapt their argument on either emotive grounds (obviously, nor can I accept that their position is internally consistant.

A few other point that were raised in earlier posts:
TNG Ep Symbiosis, Picard justified withholding help on basis on prime directive, even though the species was capable of space flight (just not warp space flight), why this particular invention marks such an absolute threshold I think needs further elaboration.

Ultimately i find that i can only accept The prime directive in any form as a misnomer, its best (?) use i would see as one particular set of guidelines of which action can be judgeded against (not the only guidelines, i want to make that point clear, even if you find an ethical theory appaling it can still be useful to see action through the lens of that principle, if only to gain another perspective)
Set Bookmark
Wed, Apr 11, 2012, 8:27pm (UTC -5) | 🔗
Re: ENT S1: Dear Doctor

Like most of the above poster i generally disagree with the point that the episode seemed geared towards. That being said whilst I disagree with the strange understanding that led to Phlox conclusion (which was a belief not a scientific argument)I still like this episode. historypeats mentioned it earlier, it was slightly refreshing to see an episode that in which the humans view was follow so predictably (like most of the first season) I agree with the humans view in this case but i like that the show disagreed with my view. it made me articulate why this view was wrong.

The question of genocide is an interesting one, particular whether the failure to act (when one can reasonably act) can be substituted for a 'diliberate' intention to destroy in whole or part a particular culture. Honestly I'm not sure, but i want to see an argument for why it is or ist, not a statement that it is or isn't.
Page 1 of 1
▲Top of Page | Menu | Copyright © 1994-2021 Jamahl Epsicokhan. All rights reserved. Unauthorized duplication or distribution of any content is prohibited. This site is an independent publication and is not affiliated with or authorized by any entity or company referenced herein. Terms of use.