Comment Stream

Search and bookmark options Close
Search for:
Search by:
Clear bookmark | How bookmarks work
Note: Bookmarks are ignored for all search results

Total Found: 216 (Showing 1-25)

Next ►Page 1 of 9
Set Bookmark
Bendy
Sun, Aug 2, 2020, 9:04pm (UTC -5)
Re: DS9 S2: Melora

While this was for sure a meh episode, I will say the point (or at least attempted point) seemed pretty obvious to me. That ultimately, given the choice of enhancing her ability to handle a higher gravity environment or retaining her identity as an Elysian, she came to the eventual realization that retaining her cultural identity, even if it means being perceived by others as being disadvantaged, was the more important choice.

And yes, I'm, watching this series (for the first time) in 2020. So far, it's holding up surprisingly well
Set Bookmark
Ben
Sat, Jul 25, 2020, 2:00am (UTC -5)
Re: VOY S6: Fury

What never made sense was WHY Kes went crazy...oh she lost her memory and blah blah but that never made sense. She left as an all powerful transcendent and thankful being and comes back as a decrepit demented psychopath.
Set Bookmark
bencanuck
Thu, Jul 9, 2020, 5:15am (UTC -5)
Re: DS9 S3: The Die Is Cast

There's something enjoyable in the fact that, a few episodes later ("Family Business"), the replacement for the runabout they lose here (the Mekong) is named the Rubicon. The Caesar references don't stop in the two-parter.
Set Bookmark
bencanuck
Tue, Jun 30, 2020, 1:27am (UTC -5)
Re: DS9 S5: Ties of Blood and Water

Some people have commented on how Weyoun and Dukat threaten the station with a (large) Jem'Hadar battlecruiser. It seems ridiculous to some people.

It's true that they wouldn't stand a chance. But actually, Dukat, Weyoun, and the audience don't know that. Until "Call to Arms", we all still think Federation shields are useless against Dominion weapons. DS9 has no ablative armour. Even with armour, the Defiant could barely hold off against a few (small) Jem'Hadar attack ships ("The Search"). While the station is armed to the teeth, if its shields were ineffective, its civilians (or even Ops) would be in real danger from a Jem'Hadar ship of that firepower. It's a real threat. Foolhardy perhaps. But threatening.
Set Bookmark
Ben
Sat, Jun 13, 2020, 9:55pm (UTC -5)
Re: TOS S2: The Changeling

James T. Kirk. Jackson Roykirk. Doesn’t sound similar to me. Really a sophisticated computer couldn’t tell the difference?
Set Bookmark
Ben
Fri, Jun 5, 2020, 8:09am (UTC -5)
Re: TOS S1: A Taste of Armageddon

Great episode. Couple of observations. The uniforms they wear on the planet were ridiculous looking. Also I always got confused between the lead councilman’s name-Anon 7 and the planet’s name - Eminiar 7. There’s plenty of other numbers to choose from!
Set Bookmark
Ben
Thu, May 28, 2020, 7:02pm (UTC -5)
Re: TOS S1: The Conscience of the King

Interesting episode. Disliked as a child like it more now. This episode feels like no other. There seems to some sets and music that were only used in this episode so it would seem. I am tired ! And your shining brightness has stuck in my head since the 1970!’s
Set Bookmark
Gubenuj
Fri, May 15, 2020, 5:27pm (UTC -5)
Re: PIC S1: Et in Arcadia Ego, Part 2

I can’t wait to hate the new Captain Pike show (which I will never watch, and about which, I do not know a thing) already. Two months without new Trek news to preemptively hate on has really sucked!
Set Bookmark
Ben
Wed, May 13, 2020, 1:45pm (UTC -5)
Re: TOS S1: Where No Man Has Gone Before

Never understood why people give this episode such a high rating. Interesting from the standpoint that it is the first episode with Kirk and the other crew but the plot is basically one that we will see again and again. Man has superpowers which must be overcome. Not that exciting. The cage was so much more interesting although NBC rejected it for their own reasons. Glad they did since I like Shatner over Hunter.
Set Bookmark
Ben
Mon, May 11, 2020, 2:28pm (UTC -5)
Re: TOS S1: Charlie X

Disliked this episode as a kid; dislike it now. Very dated and silly. The kid with super powers. Not that interesting. Weak second episode for a brand new sci fi series. The next few are much better. Charlie was just annoying. Sorry
Set Bookmark
Ben
Thu, May 7, 2020, 3:03pm (UTC -5)
Re: TOS S3: All Our Yesterdays

Always loved this episode. One question. Why would an inhabitant of the planet choose to go back to the era that Kirk gets sent to? Seems like there are better choices.
Set Bookmark
Ben
Thu, Apr 30, 2020, 11:27am (UTC -5)
Re: TOS S3: That Which Survives

Really one of the top ten worst TOS episodes. Thought so watching reruns as a kid in the 1970’s and confirmed now. Totally ridiculous plot and over the top poor acting. Yikes!
Set Bookmark
Benito
Tue, Apr 14, 2020, 10:08pm (UTC -5)
Re: TNG S7: All Good Things...

Finding this website has been really nice on my rewatch of TNG! I could never intrest anyone i know IRL in star trek so i always felt lonely enjoying these fansastic series. But reading these reviews and the comments after each episode gave me a sence of community. So i want to thank you, Jammer, for your wonderful website and also to some of the commenters i tended to look up and read every time by their names: William B, SkepticalMI, Elliot and Luke. I cant stress enough how i enjoyed your thought out critiques and disscussions on almost every page. Thank you again.
Set Bookmark
bencanuck
Wed, Apr 1, 2020, 7:02pm (UTC -5)
Re: PIC S1: Et in Arcadia Ego, Part 2

Many people have come out and said that Data's death is a case of euthanasia.

Is it? Or is there a nuance here?

Data is essentially hooked up to a machine that is sustaining his life, but he has no option to repair his actual body. There is no hope of his body winning the fight. He cannot return to life without the life-support machine and in his own body. If the life-support machine is discontinued, Data just naturally fades away quickly.

Some people refer to this as 'passive euthanasia', but I think we normally treat 'pulling the plug' on critical life support as having different moral and legal requirements than 'active euthanasia'. For instance, Booming quoted some 'very liberal' laws. Those are almost certainly for active euthanasia (not passive euthanasia or pulling the plug), because far less liberal states have less stringent requirement for 'pulling the plug' on life support.

Perhaps, in good Trekkian style, some nuance is in order, even if the whole time we're dealing with an analogy for non-organic lifeforms.
Set Bookmark
Ben S
Mon, Mar 16, 2020, 9:55pm (UTC -5)
Re: TOS S3: Wink of an Eye

While I can overlook almost all the flaws in this episode, the one that always gets me is that Kirk fires a phaser on the bridge, but it doesn’t appear in real time (even though it should). The story just kind of ignores that he did it.
Set Bookmark
bencanuck
Sat, Mar 14, 2020, 12:20am (UTC -5)
Re: PIC S1: Broken Pieces

@Daniel

"The key is that you never see the original TNG characters (Picard, Data, Troi, Riker) use those words. I think that would have broken with the characterizations."

Is that really true, though? Picard has said 'merde' on TNG. Riker has used Romulan curse-insults (such as in "The Defector"). They definitely have these words in their vocabulary.

If it would break characterization, it isn't due to the vocabulary in itself. What distinguishes the speech of Clancy, Jurati, etc. from these characters' is the casualness of the word in the middle of the sentence, e.g., as for emphasis. In the past, when Picard and Riker used such words, it was almost deliberate and decisive.

Also, it was in a foreign human or alien language...
Set Bookmark
bencanuck
Fri, Mar 6, 2020, 7:35pm (UTC -5)
Re: PIC S1: Nepenthe

@Trent

"Also, why does Riker talk about "Newton's fourth law of thermodynamics"? As far as I know, Newton doesn't have a law of thernodynamics; he wrote about laws of motion. What's up with this line?"

Newtonian dynamics of the 18th century and the new thermodynamics of the 19th were notoriously conflictual in their view of time as essentially reversible (everything in Newtonian physics has reversible time propagation) or essentially irreversible (thermodynamics, entropy). This was a huge question: is thermodynamics real or is it an approximation from our ignorance? Some giants of the 20th century, like Ilya Prigogine, devoted their entire lives to this problem.

Riker's conflation of Newton and thermodynamics deliberately flags the law as nonsense from a scientific POV. Thus, when it becomes clear that the law is an in-joke between two old friends, it is funny.
Set Bookmark
bencanuck
Fri, Feb 28, 2020, 8:13pm (UTC -5)
Re: PIC S1: The Impossible Box

@Booming

"So I guess Raffi brought money with her"

It's pretty much a given, not some wild idea. Raffi has bet latinum with Rios on whether Soji is still alive. One would assume she has access to this latinum on the La Serena. That's a more natural notion than that she is betting money that she has no access to on a one-way trip (she plans to stay behind on Freecloud).

"How did Dajh get into school and then accepted into daystrom?"

We have known since the earth-bound episodes that Dahj didn't actually have any record of being in or at a school. She only had credentials of graduation. She never 'got into school'. She never attended. The limited lifetime/past/history of both sisters was implied much, much earlier. I assume we don't dwell on this fact in this episode, because we have been living with it for half the series at this point.
Set Bookmark
bencanuck
Thu, Feb 27, 2020, 7:50pm (UTC -5)
Re: PIC S1: The Impossible Box

@Quincy

"It's PTSD. And yes, that's exactly how it works. You have a flashback from some stimulus. You react to it as if it's real. And you're not aware of your actual surroundings."

Thank you for saying this.

Needing to hold something for support is not an unthinkable reaction to trauma resurfacing. I have this effect. Picard walked onto a bridge with no railings. It was real danger as his trauma surfaced. Not only was the danger that the episode showed realistic or reasonable, it was so realistic, I could see the train wreck coming, which made it all the more sympathetic for Picard.
Set Bookmark
benoksis
Sat, Jan 4, 2020, 4:33pm (UTC -5)
Re: ENT S3: Anomaly

Alex, good points.
Jamahl Epsicokhan, that's not an "In brief".
Generally, I found the problem with the prisoner to be that he was too helpful (even before the airlock). He was a device to set up future Expanse-verse plots, and it was all laid out in his thinly veiled exposition. As a plot device, he would have given the info for a good meal. So the airlock was just to let us know Archer means business. To bad he couldn't have demonstrated his determination in a more sophisticated manner (like ben sisko getting back into the heat box).
Set Bookmark
Bensa
Sun, Dec 15, 2019, 12:37pm (UTC -5)
Re: TNG S7: Genesis

😂😂😂
Picard: ‘Before I start swinging across the ship’

Guilty pleasure episode.
7/10
Set Bookmark
Ben
Tue, Nov 26, 2019, 1:24am (UTC -5)
Re: VOY S6: Ashes to Ashes

Someone suggested that using Samantha Wildman would have been good for this episode--I agree. I believe we don't see her again after "Once Upon a Time" so had they killed her there a reunion here with Naomi would have worked great.

Another thought I had was Kes (again if they had killed her in The Gift). It would have been a better return than "Fury" a few episodes later. Obviously you replace Kim with Neelix and you have a relationship that we at least saw for three seasons.
Set Bookmark
bencanuck
Sat, Aug 3, 2019, 7:44am (UTC -5)
Re: VOY S4: Living Witness

I remember liking this episode when I was younger, but after recently rewatching it, I have to say that my reaction is something like T'Paul's or Daniel's.

The episode is creative, certainly. And the use of fun 'mirror universe' elements to tell a substantial story and contribute to ideas of a philosophical or sociological order is really appreciated. This episode is well thought out on several fronts, as well as well produced, designed well, and acted with conviction. But...

The narrative sets up oppression that is happening, for the characters in the story, *right now*. There are people being oppressed un the *now* of the characters. Everyone knows it. It can be seen with their eyes. They just have to open them.

Meanwhile, the plot focuses in on the historical accuracy of events in the past. This is where the problem lies. Anyone with a mind for justice is more concerned with oppression that they can see is definitely, without a doubt, happening right now. But because of its design and theme, the plot of 'Living Witness' expects us to care more about the intricacies of the past, and this is framed in terms of justice, too, not just accuracy.

And that's where it all collapses. Right, establishing the truth is about justice. We can all agree to that. But this historical justice is not of a lesser value than *known* contemporary acts of oppression. Anyone who thinks that is, in practice, supporting those contemporary acts of oppression. If, today, someone were to divert thinking about contemporary racial injustice towards one specific incident on one specific day 700 years ago, most of us would consider this to be racist distraction. Conveniently shifting priorities like this is usually a sign of support for racist activity. And rightly so. Emphasis and priority say a lot.

That's why some people feel as if the episode is saying the oppressed 'deserved it'. The episode doesn't say this. But the writers *do* definitely say that, for this episode's themes and plot, definitive contemporary injustice is less relevant than historical accuracy. After all, one drives the plot, while the other is just part of the story, background, and environment.

And that... is just odd for a Star Trek ethos. It is bound to be upsetting for some people. The episode needed a significant contribution saying that the oppression that definitely exists was the major issue (because we *know* it is happening *now*), though this does not imply that historical accuracy is unimportant. But... if the episode takes this direction, it also ceases to be recognizable as 'Living Witness'. Thr narrative consistency, tightness, and focus will diminish. If, however, narrative consistency and focus win, then the implication is that the contemporary theme is secondary to the historical theme. But if the contemporary theme of *known* oppression is secondary to establishing the facts about one day 700 years ago, basically any sort of racial diversion tactics are left uncriticized. This is a gaping hole for anyone who is concerned about *both* sorts of (in)justice. Thus the episode is both a creative masterpiece and an unsalvageable thematic disaster from the get-go. Once you see what is missing and what choices were made in the narrative focus, it becomes disconcerting.
Set Bookmark
bencanuck
Sat, Mar 23, 2019, 12:29am (UTC -5)
Re: DSC S2: Project Daedalus

@Skyelord

"speaking crew on the actual ship"

Bryce and Rhys are male characters; they're on the bridge in most episodes (in season 2, nearly every episode or perhaps every episode). They have names and talk. They're certainly more important characters than Pollard ('Replacement Doctor').

Not sure why you don't see the black man and the Asian man on the bridge. They're there.
Set Bookmark
Ben
Wed, Mar 20, 2019, 2:21pm (UTC -5)
Re: DSC S2: Project Daedalus

It's tough to root for team nu-Trek when they change so much, shit all over what came before, drastically underperform in the writing department, then act so smug and SWJ self-righteous about it when they can't even get their facts right about what DID come before... you know, the ST content that became popular, inspired a franchise and created the opportunity for these people to have a JOB creating new Trek these days?

https://twitter.com/startrekcbs/status/1108443091025956865?s=21

Tower of Babel is an episode?

This is a nitpick, but that SMG error embodies the "end of history" that's happening in modern works today. Who cares about the old? Who cares about the standards of what came before? Let's just redo Trek, and redo it in a self-absorbed way that clearly misses the mark on so many levels. SMH.
Next ►Page 1 of 9
▲Top of Page | Menu | Copyright © 1994-2020 Jamahl Epsicokhan. All rights reserved. Unauthorized duplication or distribution of any content is prohibited. This site is an independent publication and is not affiliated with or authorized by any entity or company referenced herein. See site policies.