Comment Stream

Search and bookmark options Close
Search for:
Search by:
Clear bookmark | How bookmarks work
Note: Bookmarks are ignored for all search results

Total Found: 61 (Showing 51-61)

◄ PreviousPage 3 of 3
Set Bookmark
Franco
Fri, Mar 9, 2018, 6:21pm (UTC -6)
Re: VOY S6: Barge of the Dead

To me, it is an ok+ episode. Nothing more. Too much Klingon babble-lore is kinda boring.
Set Bookmark
Franco
Mon, Mar 5, 2018, 9:14am (UTC -6)
Re: VOY S5: Nothing Human

I completely agree with Georgios. A contrived ending for a contrived dilemma. It should be one star at best.
Set Bookmark
Franco
Sat, Mar 3, 2018, 7:56am (UTC -6)
Re: VOY S4: Demon

LOL. I loved the photon torpedo "The Trek novels AREN'T CANON!".
Set Bookmark
Franco
Fri, Mar 2, 2018, 12:58pm (UTC -6)
Re: VOY S4: Retrospect

It is not an awful episode per se, but damn boring. It could have been really interesting if Seven had accused a crew member, like Tom or Chakotay. Who really cares about the weapon merchant?
Set Bookmark
Franco
Wed, Feb 28, 2018, 7:12pm (UTC -6)
Re: VOY S4: Random Thoughts

No, no, no. Simply idiotic. If a premise is flawed, the whole show is screwed up. This is just a pedestrian trekkian cliche with a pertubing facist undertone: ops, one unsuspecting crew member suposedly commited a crime against the aliens of the week, who happen not to allow "bad" thoughts in their "enlighted" society.
Set Bookmark
Franco
Mon, Feb 12, 2018, 8:24pm (UTC -6)
Re: DSC S1: Will You Take My Hand?

I have enjoyed this Star Trek extravaganza first season, despite its problems sure. It does seem to me that the producers had a megalomaniac plot worth 26 (or more!) shows which has been brutally forced into those 15 episodes we actually had - just like what happened to Voq who was brutally reduced into poor Ash! I'd rather have had more story and character development and less fancy gimmicks and superfluous SFX. Maybe the producers should have spent the money more wisely and simply made more episodes to tell their story. The finale does seem particularly rushed where it should really matter.

Anyway, seeing the Enterprise it is a hell of a cliffhanger itself.
Set Bookmark
Franco
Thu, Aug 18, 2016, 12:14pm (UTC -6)
Re: TNG S2: Unnatural Selection

As I mentioned in previous posts, this episode is another proof that Pulaski could have been a great character if she stayed in the show also in further seasons; Muldaur's performance is very high and her growing relationship with members of Enterprise (in particular with Picard, Data and Troi) could have added a nice touch in other seasons and many occasions to laugh for their dialogues. With all respect, Gates McFadden's Crusher is too much flat as character compared to Pulaski.
Set Bookmark
Franco
Sat, Aug 13, 2016, 6:52am (UTC -6)
Re: TNG S2: The Child

Wow, finally you can write openly and admit that Pulaski was a very good character :-) It's so nice to see that after all these years there are many fans of her!
And to whom says that Pulaski's character development was not so good in this season, I invite you to watch it again: Pulaski is much more "evident" in one season than Crusher in 6 seasons!
Concerning a possible Pulaski-Picard affair, who did ask for that? If Pulaski stayed in TNG, we would have laughed a lot for this combination Picard-Pulaski-Data and her curiosity to learn about new cultures (see the episode with Worf).
Set Bookmark
Franco
Sun, Apr 24, 2011, 2:43am (UTC -6)
Re: TNG S2: The Child

Diana Muldaur is a good actress. Yep, she was twice in TOS (one is the episode you were referring to, "Return to tomorrow", and the other one is "Is there in truth no beauty?").
Set Bookmark
Franco
Sat, Apr 23, 2011, 1:51am (UTC -6)
Re: TNG S2: The Child

Papa.

I agree perfectly with what you write.

I add something more. It's right when you say that most of TNG fans hated her because of her skepticism for Data, at the beginning of the season.
But, come on, this is humanity; she does not underestimate him or humiliate him, she just has some doubts about the real complexity of Data. Later in the season, she seems to like him, even to understand him better than others.

Not speaking about the moment she shares with Worf which witnesses a development of the character.

Then I personally like that human and witty behaviour of her, above all with Picard; they have some communication problems at the beginning but you can feel that there is a lot of respect between Picard and Pulaski.

She is nice, sharp, brave and with strong personality; as Papa wrote, if she were in DS9 maybe fans would have loved her very much. Because DS9 focuses on characters.

I just say, let's not forget Pulaski from the universe of Star Trek characters.
Set Bookmark
Franco
Fri, Apr 22, 2011, 9:03am (UTC -6)
Re: TNG S2: The Child

Hello from Italy.
This is the first time I comment on this great site and I'd like to begin with a particular aspect of TNG season 2 on which I ask for your opinions.

The topic is DR. PULASKI, magnificently played by Diana Muldaur.

I just finished to watch again TNG season 2 and I think that Pulaski has been a fresh breeze in the slow beginning of TNG (first and second seasons).
I have read so many bad reviews about her but why?

If you compared her character with another strong character like Data, for ex., I could even understand. But if we compare her with Dr. Crusher, there is no match.
Dr. Crusher is one of the most boring and absolutely not pushed characters of all Star Trek season; you see or you don't see her, is not important.
Dr. Pulaski instead has a strong personality; someone compared her to Dr. McCoy but I'd rather say that she is just strong, determined, very human, even nice in some comic moments with Data and Picard (not speaking about the klingon ceremony that she shares with Worf).
Many fans think that she is unpolite just because, at the beginning, she innocently underestimate the real complexity of Data (but later in the season, she seems to appreciate him very much).
Basically, in just 1 season, Dr. Pulaski has a greater evolution than Dr. Crusher in 6 seasons!

So, at last, I'd like to know what you have against this poor and underestimated character.
It could have been great to have her for the whole series.
◄ PreviousPage 3 of 3
▲Top of Page | Menu | Copyright © 1994-2020 Jamahl Epsicokhan. All rights reserved. Unauthorized duplication or distribution of any content is prohibited. This site is an independent publication and is not affiliated with or authorized by any entity or company referenced herein. See site policies.