Star Trek: The Next Generation
"The First Duty"




Air date: 3/30/1992
Written by Ronald D. Moore & Naren Shankar
Directed by Paul Lynch
Review by Jamahl Epsicokhan
The Enterprise returns to Earth so Picard can deliver the commencement address at Starfleet Academy, but upon arrival the crew learns that cadet Wesley Crusher and his flight team, an elite group on campus called Nova Squadron, has been involved in an accident during a flight exercise that has resulted in the death of one of their team members. An investigation has been opened to find out what caused the deadly crash. As we follow the courtroom-like proceedings of the hearing (and the young cadets' ominous conversations behind closed doors), it becomes clear there is more to this accident than they have claimed.
After years of being a punch line on this series because of his ridiculous tendency to always be a step ahead of the adults on the show, at long last we finally have a believable episode where Wesley Crusher isn't so goddamned perfect. (Though it's still so unthinkable that Wesley could do something wrong that his mother doesn't even consider, for one second, the possibility that he has lied when the evidence clearly indicates that he might have. She instead believes the evidence must surely be false.) No, here Wesley is a grounded human being looking at the real possibility of his future going up in smoke.
"The First Duty" is in the storied tradition of the courtroom drama, and on that level it's effective. The facts are clearly laid out, the evidence is sensibly and logically presented, and the parts where the cadets get caught up in the inaccuracies (i.e., lies) of their story generate real suspense, especially with the intimidating Admiral Brand (Jacqueline Brookes) overseeing the proceedings. You see, the rest of Nova Squadron doesn't want to come forward with the whole truth, so Wesley finds himself caught uncomfortably between his conscience and his comrades. The leader, Nick Locarno (Robert Duncan McNeill, whose character here would later be slightly retooled into Tom Paris on Voyager) makes a convincing-sounding argument that the team should be placed higher than any individual on it. (His argument, of course, leaves out the part about being willing to sacrifice their integrity — not to mention the reputation of the dead pilot — but I suppose no cover-up is perfect.)
Enter into this fray Picard, whose own forensics into the matter (at first to help clear Wesley) lead him to discover what Nova Squadron was actually trying to do and now is trying cover up. This leads to a tense confrontation between Picard and Wesley where he lays out what he knows and tells Wesley that he must come forward with the truth. It's a classic Picard speech that draws a moral line in the sand and says, hey, there is no gray area here. It's the sort of earnest speechifying that makes TNG uniquely what it is — and it works powerfully here.
In addition to its solid storytelling, I like how "The First Duty" adds to the canvas of the TNG universe. I believe this is the first time we actually see Starfleet Academy, and it comes across as a real place inhabited by real people — right on down to Boothby (Ray Walston), the curmudgeonly old groundskeeper who remembers Picard from his academy days and offers useful tidbits of wisdom and insight — about mistakes made in the past, as well as the present.
Interestingly, I remember hearing or reading somewhere (not sure where; maybe it was a BSG commentary track) that Ron Moore's original script for this episode had Wesley not coming forward with the truth, and instead the incident was covered up. That ending was rejected by the bosses, but what a fascinating alternate episode that might've been — and a very different one. Whether it would've been better or worse, I can't say. But I can say that the actual version of "The First Duty" is a standout TNG outing and a captivating morality play, and easily the best Wesley Crusher episode ever made.
Previous episode: Cause and Effect
Next episode: Cost of Living

99 comments on this review
Wed, May 11, 2011, 6:58am (UTC -6)
The Kolvoord Starburst is very cool--and watching them piece together how it really happened was awesome. Joshua Albert's father did a wonderful job, and meeting Sito Jaxa here was great. I had actually seen "Lower Decks" before seeing this one, so realizing the continuity was there was nice.
The entire supporting cast was great--but I hate the loss of continuity with Locarno. Every time "Locarno" was onscreen, there was a "clunk" (not Paris) in my brain.
Wed, May 11, 2011, 8:35pm (UTC -6)
Anyway, amazing episode, in my top ten easily. FOUR STARS.
Agreed about the Paris/Locarno thing. I basically imagine they are the same character.
Wed, May 11, 2011, 11:50pm (UTC -6)
So they were trying to screw Moore and Shankar? Berman...figures.
Thu, May 12, 2011, 12:42am (UTC -6)
Thu, May 12, 2011, 4:03am (UTC -6)
Yet I had no problem with Gul Dukat being Gul Macet and 3 or 4 other characthers within Trek.
Oh, great episode easily a 3.5.
Thu, May 12, 2011, 2:47pm (UTC -6)
There's a hint even in Tom Paris' name -- Locarno is a town in Switzerland.
Fri, May 13, 2011, 7:26pm (UTC -6)
If anyone is interested on the changes from the original script, there's a detailed discussion on the Memory Alpha page for this episode, including quotes from Ron Moore and Michael Piller about the ending.
As for Locarno/Paris, an alternative explanation offered by the producers is that they thought that Locarno as a character was irredeemable.
Fri, May 13, 2011, 7:57pm (UTC -6)
As it stands, this is the episode which makes me frown at the whole Sisko/Eddington arc in DS9--first duty is to the truth becomes first duty is to the uniform. Yeah, I think Picard should have stuck around that station to supervise, dismiss and eventually incarcerate Sisko. But hey, instead he got a medal!
Fri, May 13, 2011, 7:58pm (UTC -6)
That makes perfect sense, given how often Jammer wrote about Voyager's aversion to storytelling risks. That show would've been much more interesting with a preening jerk at the helm instead of the Rebel Without a Clue viewers were forced to watch.
Interesting how the main critiques of this episode are of choices that *didn't* get made.
Sat, May 14, 2011, 7:16pm (UTC -6)
If that's the case, I'd say it is a pretty weak explanation. Why would he be irredeemable? At the end Locarno showed us he's not a completely rotten apple. Delta Quadrant is a perfect place for some redemption methinks.
Wed, Jun 1, 2011, 9:36am (UTC -6)
They Voyager totally destroyed the Paris character turning him into a bad 1-line delivering chump.
I heard back in the day, that Voyager was supposed to be a less captain-oriented show, and Paris was supposed to have at least equal footing, if not the main character. They wanted to have him Kirk his way across the Delta Quadrant. But then that was shelved when Mulgrew came on board.
The first few Voyagers were quite Tom heavy I seem to remember.
Anyway, back to this episode.
I've been in Wesley's position at school (Nothing like the death of person, just a stupid gang-fight when we were 10, those happy days where everyone jumps in and no one really gets hurt).
There are times when you know that keeping quiet will win through, and other times, like this one, where owning up is the only answer. Plus of course there was the "permanent record" threat, and I was still young enough to take it seriously and wanted to join the airforce, so...
Mon, Aug 22, 2011, 1:47pm (UTC -6)
I did not find Brand intimidating at all.
Thu, Aug 25, 2011, 6:37pm (UTC -6)
Because Starfleet requires an expertise in militarism without condoning its use. It's akin to the man who owns a gun he never plans on using or, hell, the Jedi who fight in only the most extreme of circumstances. If you teach a child how to use a gun, but also to abhor it's use, you minimise the danger to that or any other child's life, for if he should need to use it, he can, but will (hopefully) never use it unless he needs to.
I will say though, I found the idea of spectacular air-shows in the style of the modern military to be beyond the purview of real Star Trek. I have no difficulty in chalking that one up to the writing credit.
Sun, Sep 4, 2011, 3:27pm (UTC -6)
Voyager was conceived as a ship running into Adventures of the Week (AotW) with a far less perfect crew than TNG's. The story of redemption is very much a Tom Paris thing. It would have been every bit as much a Nick Locarno thing. So yes, to this day it kind of irks me.
Thu, Sep 8, 2011, 9:37pm (UTC -6)
Thu, Oct 13, 2011, 7:24pm (UTC -6)
Those were more likely training shuttles than fighters. I took the whole thing to be simply a show of pride in their training and skills as pilots.
Fri, Oct 14, 2011, 1:56am (UTC -6)
Fri, Oct 28, 2011, 3:01pm (UTC -6)
Thu, Dec 15, 2011, 12:30am (UTC -6)
Thu, Dec 29, 2011, 12:21am (UTC -6)
So if you follow that to its logical conclusion, if they had made kept the character as Locarno for Voyager, Moore & Shankar would have been paid residuals for every single episode of Voyager that featured the Locarno/Paris character. I agree it would have been cool, but I can also see why TPTB wouldn't have wanted to shell out all that residual money when instead they could just rename the character.
Wed, Apr 25, 2012, 2:18am (UTC -6)
Thu, Jun 28, 2012, 9:15am (UTC -6)
It's also all a bit hokey and simple but the drama is there and it builds well.
Ultimately the ending does feel a bit of a let off for Wesley and Co but I guess this is as raw and real as TNG was allowed to get.
Fri, Jul 27, 2012, 1:01am (UTC -6)
If I recall correctly (and it's been many years), once Wesley confessed, Locarno took full responsibility, officially stating that the other cadets were only following his lead and that he deserved the brunt of the punishment (and they obliged). Of course, this makes the official story about Locarno being "irredeemable" an absolute joke.
"The royalties thing is more complicated than just one payment that they screwed Moore & Shankar out of. The WGA has rules on "character payments" that basically say that if you write an episode with a particular character, and that character gets used again in future episodes, you are owed a fee for the use of your character. "
That makes it worse, in my opinion. The WGA negotiated and fought for those rules for a good reason: to ensure that writers are paid for their work. The powers that be found Moore and Shankar's character so compelling that they even sought out the same actor for the role several years later, and then used the exact same backstory, but basically changed the name to avoid paying royalties. If they didn't want to pay for the character, they were more than welcome to invent one of their own... but either couldn't or wouldn't.
Mon, Dec 3, 2012, 11:04am (UTC -6)
Mon, Dec 3, 2012, 3:28pm (UTC -6)
I agree in principle -- however, the creation of characters in a writer's room is MUCH more complicated process than who gets credit for the episode. The stories are usually all 'broken' by the entire room, meaning every writer contributes to how each scene will play out. Once that has been agreed to, only then do the writers go and write their draft. So Moore & Shankar, for all we know, may not have named *or* created the Locarno character.
It's also possible (but unlikely) that the episode was also rewritten by other members of the staff (like the Executive Producers/showrunners) after the writers have turned in their first draft.
What I'm getting at is that it's entirely possible that the character, name and backstory of Nicholas Locarno were created by Michael Piller and Rick Berman, who were running TNG at the time. So even though Moore & Shankar may have written the episode, the character might have been originated by the people who eventually went on to create VOY. And IF that is the case (and it's a big IF), then I would understand why they would change the character name to get around paying 7 years worth of residuals for a character that they created.
As I say, a pretty big if.
Fri, Jan 18, 2013, 7:08pm (UTC -6)
Sat, Feb 16, 2013, 12:43am (UTC -6)
The second time I watched it, I got to the point where he threw Josh Albert's reputation under the bus and lost all sympathy for the guy.
Mon, Mar 11, 2013, 1:00pm (UTC -6)
Sun, Mar 24, 2013, 9:34pm (UTC -6)
Sat, Jul 6, 2013, 10:19am (UTC -6)
It has to be said, there isn't a whole lot of competition on that one. It was refreshing in this episode to see Wesley undergoing, at long last, some actual character development and moving beyond being the infallible, perfect creator's pet.
As for the Tom Paris/Nick Locarno issue, I always think of them as being the same character and ignore the difference of name. After all, they are essentially the same character, with the same actor. The excuse that Locarno was irredeemable is just BS.
Wed, Jul 24, 2013, 7:35pm (UTC -6)
Sun, Dec 1, 2013, 1:11pm (UTC -6)
Fri, Jan 3, 2014, 4:26pm (UTC -6)
The only difference is that it happened while he was a Starfleet officer - he actually graduated before. Which makes sense - Janeway would never have recruited (or even heard of!) a former cadet booted out before graduation.
Fri, Jan 3, 2014, 4:28pm (UTC -6)
The only reason they wanted that is that they didn't believe a female Captain would be enough to keep the show together. Thank God Mulgrew convinced them of the contrary and Voyager was just as captain-centric as every other Star Trek series. It's what makes them successful (and yes, I loved Voyager and love Cpt Janeway)
Fri, Jan 3, 2014, 4:53pm (UTC -6)
I think Mulgrew, mostly, did a nice acting job on Voyager. But as was the case for much of Voyager, the writing wasn't very good. Janeway's actions were often quite unjustifiable. Granted, the "real" Janeway didn't initiate the chain of events in "Endgame." But the writing staff's idea that Janeway would change everyone's future for (really) just Chakotay, Seven and Tuvok was typical and really poorly conceived. I know there's a line in the finale about other crew members dying. But Janeway didn't seem to care about all the others who died before "Endgame."
Many of her actions, from killing Tuvix to going crazy on the Equinox to forming an alliance with the Borg, were really out there. Now, the creators could have done something interesting with this and made Starfleet (later in the series, when regular communication was possible) or members of the crew hold Janeway accountable -- while she defended her maverick behavior by citing Voyager's unique situation. But other than some minor conflict with Chakotay, we saw none of this. Like almost all of Voyager, consequences didn't matter -- only that hour's plot did.
This is why Voyager is the fourth, maybe fifth, best series.
Now, Paris as a sort of co-star might not have worked well either, but McNeil usually was one of the show's better actors and was one of the few who was given much in the way to do after the first couple seasons (other than the series' crutches of Seven and the Doctor).
Wed, Jan 15, 2014, 2:45pm (UTC -6)
Tue, Jan 21, 2014, 6:24pm (UTC -6)
What utter nonsense.
Tue, Jan 21, 2014, 10:41pm (UTC -6)
I should have mentioned in one of my posts that I like this episode for what it makes of Wesley's character, the introduction of Boothby, and the sheen it places on Picard's moral compass, but it skirts that DS9 line of overemphasising Starfleet's military qualities.
Wed, Jan 22, 2014, 3:45am (UTC -6)
Having an an air display team is pretty fluffy compared to pitching officers against itself in missmatched battles or putting them in no win scenarios.
Even if you roll your eyes at the idea of Starfleet being a millitary organisation a display team is hardly against the ethics of the Federation.
Wed, Jan 22, 2014, 8:04am (UTC -6)
Wed, Jan 22, 2014, 10:49am (UTC -6)
Wed, Jan 22, 2014, 1:40pm (UTC -6)
James Kirk in Errand of Mercy: "I'm a soldier, not a diplomat."
Scotty in A Taste of Armageddon: Diplomats! The best diplomat I know is a fully activated phaser bank!"
For someone who is supposedly so obsessed with the legacy and "myth" of Star Trek, you do seem to conveniently forget everything that runs contrary to your preferred interpretation.
Wed, Jan 22, 2014, 2:20pm (UTC -6)
Wed, Jan 22, 2014, 4:08pm (UTC -6)
What I care about and what in my opinion is alpha and omega of any TV show are the things right there on the screen.
You are constantly reinforcing your idea of what Trek is and what place its myth has, and whether something is true Trek or not, and yet in the process of this passionate defense of the very core of Trek (as you see it), you commit the most fatal mistake time and again - you start with TNG, outright dismissing evidence from the show twenty years its senior.
TOS is where Trek started, that's where its legacy begins. And in TOS we have a militarised Starfleet quick to draw weapons, we have human governors who murder one half of a colony's population, we have Kirk flagrantly and repeatedly meddling into internal affairs of numerous species, not to mention that a disturbingly high percentage of humans we meet in the show are of dubious morals, often itching for a good lynching of anything they don't understand.
It's not so much humans or the Federation, it's Enterprise and her crew that oftentimes seem to be the only sane ones battling for a better world that is generally infested with idiots, bureaucrats, cowboys and frontiersmen with too short a fuse.
My problem with your eloquent and fun to read analyses is that you cherry-pick the starting point of your grand Trek mythology and insist that anything that runs contrary to this, frankly myopic, view is a perversion of Trek ideals.
And even if that was true, so what? I have no problem watching and enjoying and loving a perversion of an original if it's a quality thing I see before my eyes. And honestly, as someone who's been around the Internet for a long time, it's such a tediously familiar sentiment.
When TNG began, it was the betrayal of Kirk and Spock, when DS9 came along, it corrupted the very essence of Trek, reimagined Galactica was scorned and hated by many as it was only a travesty not worthy of the original (indeed, it was often called GINO - Galactica in Name Only), and today I see the same with Game of Thrones -- a bastardy of everything that is good and holy just because it isn't the carbon copy of the books. As someone who read (and obsessed about) those many years before the show, I can tell you it's all, well, bullshit.
Wed, Jan 22, 2014, 4:20pm (UTC -6)
@Elliott: "When Gene got to make his show exactly the way he wanted and create a cogent philosophy for his Universe (a philosophy from which the myth takes shape), he was rather uncompromising in his vision."
This piece of evidence you offer is honestly quite damning to your case. TNG was a very weak show in its first two years. The first season in particular was often abysmal and hard to watch (though I enjoyed it in all its hilarious glory). The show truly came into its own and became a great drama during its third season after Roddenberry had been forced to take a back seat and relinquish the creative control over the show. Michael Piller, who took over the writer's room, is the guy most responsible for TNG's enduring legacy.
Wed, Jan 22, 2014, 7:18pm (UTC -6)
"Code of Honor" clearly establishes Yar as a combat officer, both in backstory and current role on the Enterprise. "The Battle" describes Picard's prior involvement in, well, battle, up to and including note of his "Picard Maneuver", which is further described in "Peak Performance". Why would a non-military organization participate in clearly military action, including the teaching of specific military strategies with the use of said maneuver? Granted, season one is generally abysmal, but then in "Too Short a Season" we see a Starfleet admiral choosing to arm both sides in a conflict to "even things out". In "Conspiracy", the military ethos of Starfleet seems fairly clear (my own interpretation, admittedly), but then in "The Neutral Zone" the ship is dispatched as an envoy to the Romulans.
Now, so far you could certainly argue that Starfleet fills a diplomatic role extensively alongside its military role; arguably this is unintentionally disturbing, as if anything it suggests a weakness of civilian government in the Federation. We tend to see very few civilian diplomats or civilian officials of any kind apart perhaps from the Federation President. In "A Matter of Honor", Riker participates in a crew exchange program with the Klingons, which would be nonsensical outside a military context. In "Peak Performance" the Enterprise takes part in battle simulation. What kind of non-military organization engages in that?
Further examples of Starfleet's military function occur in "The Enemy", "The Defector", "The Best of Both Worlds", "The Wounded" (see both Maxwell and O'Brien), "The Drumhead", "The Mind's Eye", "Redemption", "Unification", "I, Borg", "Chain of Command", "Descent", "The Pegasus", "Lower Decks", "Journey's End", and "Preemptive Strike", along with Star Trek II, Star Trek VI, and First Contact, among others.
It's true that Picard once said that Starfleet was not a military organization, which is only true insofar it is not exclusively so. The argument could be made, however, that its activities are far too broad and appear to crowd out many of the civilian governance functions of the Federation. Picard may be an "accomplished diplomat", but where are the civilian diplomats and politicians? At least on DS9 we got some sense of civilian life on Earth and elsewhere, something given short shrift on TNG.
So, as near as I can tell by Elliott's argument Gene's vision encompasses a Federation run mainly by a quasi-military Starfleet that assumes almost all exploratory, scientific, security, and diplomatic functions, to the relative exclusion of civilians. While organizational hierarchies exist throughout society, a consistent limitation of TNG in particular is a poor depiction of civilian life outside the Starfleet command structure, along with a failure to examine the political significance of military vs. civilian governance (see DS9's "Homefront" and "Paradise Lost").
Wed, Jan 22, 2014, 8:08pm (UTC -6)
Thu, Jan 23, 2014, 3:20am (UTC -6)
A display in a few shuttles is not disimilar. It's not like kids are being asked to carpet bomb a city and then do a loop the loop.
Thu, Jan 23, 2014, 8:19am (UTC -6)
Wed, Apr 30, 2014, 6:08pm (UTC -6)
Good episode, though!
Sat, Aug 2, 2014, 11:48am (UTC -6)
Sun, Aug 3, 2014, 3:17am (UTC -6)
Maybe Picard was reevaluating his use of a betazoid after they used one in the Drumhead in the same manner.
Sun, Aug 3, 2014, 1:42pm (UTC -6)
Sun, Oct 5, 2014, 1:37am (UTC -6)
I also forgot that Wesley and Josh went to CALGARY, of all places. (And they probably only name-dropped it cause of the '88 Olympics, haha). Of course, if you were actually going to the Canadian Rockies, then Whistler, Jasper or Banff would make more sense as destinations. Or maybe they went to Calgary and did a side-trip to Banff. WHATEVER. I just have a little inner *squee* when something Canadian is mentioned...especially on Star Trek!
Fri, Oct 24, 2014, 11:28pm (UTC -6)
Sun, Feb 15, 2015, 5:15am (UTC -6)
"Nick Locarno had real honour. He took the blame and didn't grass his team up. In a real world situation, Wesley would be an outcast for good."
Well, if he had real honor, then shouldn't he have taken the blame from the beginning, instead of in the end when he had nothing to lose from it. On the contraryy: As Whimsy pointed out above, taking the blame in the end was really working in Locarno's favor.
He ordered his squadron to perform a forbidden, extremely dangerous maneuver only for the show, and one team mate died while practicing it. One could argue that it had been the duty of every team member to object to the maneuver and to report Locarno's orders to a higher authority within Starfleet. But as squadron leader, Locarno was also responsible for the actions of the squadron, and he certainly was responsible for the effects of them carrying out his orders.
Locarno was loyal to his team, but he put this loyalty above his loyalty to Starfleet as a whole, since he compromised Starfleet's virtues ("The first duty is to the truth") and put Starfleet's reputation at risk (if the truth about Albert's death had been found out, the ensuing scandal about a group of the Academy's top graduates would have brushed off on the Academy and Starfleet as a whole).
Moreover, Locarno put his loyalty to the team above the good of the individual team members. He sacrificed Albert's reputation to save the reputation of the rest of the team. And of course, this rest included himself. So essentially his loyalty was more to his personal interests than to the team or anyone else. If it had been about the team, then he should have taken full responsibility from the beginning, thereby being loyal to the team (the others' reputations and career chances would remain mostly intact) as well as to Starfleet (by sticking to the truth, since it really was his responsibility).
On the other hand, Wesley chose to come forward with the truth at a point when he had everything to lose from it. He and the others had just been acquitted and he could have just gone on with his career (though with a big guilty conscience). But he put Albert's reputation and the principles of Starfleet above his friendship to Locarno and the remaining team mates. Wouldn't you agree that Wesley's actions are much more honorable than Locarno's?
Oh, and by the way: What does "DLPB" stand for?
Sun, Feb 15, 2015, 5:32am (UTC -6)
1) A recurring theme in Wesley's arc is his search for a father figure. In "Family", we learned that his father being a Starfleet officer was what made Wesley want to join the organization himself. In "Final Mission", he explicitly told Picard what had been hinted at many times before: That his main motivation for pursuing perfection in Starfleet was to make Picard proud of him. Here, we see that after leaving the Enterprise and joining the Academy, Wesley has found a new father figure in Locarno. When his old father figure Picard comes back at the table, Wesley is faced with a conflict, because these two fathers represent different ethical convictions: Picard's loyalty is to the society (the Federation) as a whole and to its principles, while Locarno is loyal to his friends (to a certain degree), whom he knows and cares for personally. Wesley is conflicted by this because he is not sure yet what his own ethical beliefs are. While on the Enterprise, he had taken Picard's side ("I'm with Starfleet, we don't lie"). But in the light of this episode, it is probable that this had not been because this was his own conviction, but as another attempt to impress Picard and to be accepted by the senior crew. Then at the Academy, he probably leaned towards Locarno's side for the same reasons. At the end of the episode, he has returned to the previous stance, but this time he has come to these beliefs because he sees that it is right. Though part of his decision might still be due to his fear that Picard will not respect him anymore if he keeps on lying...
2) What was the deal with Albert's father? I understand that he probably was supposed to be in pain, but his facial expressions and the way his torso rocked left and right while walking gave me the impression that he was having a stroke. It was mildly irritating.
Sun, Feb 15, 2015, 1:56pm (UTC -6)
I am not buying the silly "We pressured him into it" as that was a deliberate red herring by the writers.
Tue, Feb 17, 2015, 10:35am (UTC -6)
Sat, Mar 14, 2015, 11:17pm (UTC -6)
Fri, Apr 3, 2015, 10:16am (UTC -6)
That door, unusual to have that in star trek. Sometimes it makes a noise when you open it, sometimes not. It was also incredibly rude (& unbelievable) when Wesley asks Pic & Mum to leave. Could you imagine that? Asking a vastly superior officer to piss off?
Finally, weird to see Wesley walk on the grass at the end at a military institution.
Wed, Apr 29, 2015, 9:58am (UTC -6)
@ Paul M. "It's not so much humans or the Federation, it's Enterprise and her crew that oftentimes seem to be the only sane ones battling for a better world that is generally infested with idiots, bureaucrats, cowboys and frontiersmen with too short a fuse.
Yes! THIS exactly! It's what made TOS great. To me, the weakest points of TNG come when it's suggested that all of humanity has somehow evolved to attain nearly-Picardesque perfection. A large part of what makes Picard a strong and compelling character is what viewers could presume to be the relative rarity of his qualities. It's just not believable that, in the next 300 years (or even another 3,000), society will somehow have been perfected. Unfortunately, there will always be petty bureaucrats, criminals, con men, would be despots, etc. among us. Look at our own history...Improvements in technology and economics have made life far better for most compared to 300 years ago, and most of the brutality that was commonplace then (public executions, genocide, colonialism) is now morally unthinkable (at least among most modern Western cultures), but our modern society is still very FAR from perfect. Will humanity continue to improve in the future? I certainly hope so. But perfection does not seem realistic to me.
Tue, Jul 7, 2015, 12:46pm (UTC -6)
This episode has some of the best acting and it is easy to forget the writing. Even minor characters like the pudgy Vulcan really come off as completely authentic.
The story itself is well tailored to Wesley. Here is basically a perfect kid, capable and brilliant who finds himself following the leader. You can witness Locarno putting the screws on Wesley and you see how the other members got caught up in it. Something similar happened to my brother in the army.
As for an alternative ending, I think Wesley would come clean since Picard already knew.
Small comment about Robert Duncan McNeill's dual role. I recall seeing a "Voyager" preview and the producers mentioned that they were looking for a Robert Duncan McNeill type character and eventually decided why not reuse him. I agree with other posters a great continuity payoff would be to retool Locarno and add some backstory about how he was able to graduate. Fanboys love nuance like this and you can see how much discomfort renaming him caused.
Tue, Jul 7, 2015, 1:05pm (UTC -6)
The official version is that the writers found Locarno to be irredeemable. It's BS. If they couldn't find a way to redeem him they are pieces of trash writers who should be fired and replaced with fan-fic writers.
The ACTUAL answer is that the writer for THIS episode would need to be paid royalties for every episode of Voyager that they reused his character in.
Wed, Aug 19, 2015, 9:06am (UTC -6)
"The First Duty" is better than "Cause and Effect," however. It has wonderful world-building (which, again, I love in my Trek), great performances, a magnificent Picard Speech (it's too bad Wil Wheaton didn't take that advice to heart in his real life) and a nicely multi-layered guest character in Locarno. Where it stumbles, and this is really getting repetitive, is its depiction of Wesley.
I agree that there definitely was an attempt made here to make Wesley a little less than perfect, possibly even actually human. However, they just couldn't help themselves, could they? Even when they actually make the attempt to bring the character down a peg or two, they still had to make him special. Wesley is the only member of Nova Squadron to have any reservations about what they're doing? The only one?! Right from the get-go we have the whole "humanize Wesley" angle destroyed. I'm not saying they had to have another Nova Squadron member be as hesitate as Wesley all along, but at least something was necessary. It couldn't be Locarno, since he's the ring leader of the cover-up; that would be rather odd. But couldn't at least one of the others have at least a moment's doubt? Couldn't one of them say something like "maybe Wesley's right" only for Locarno to immediately re-persuade her? No, we can't have that, can we?! That would mean that Wesley wouldn't solely occupy the moral high ground among the four of them. And that's just not acceptable, isn't it?! God, enough already! I'm sure some people will think that I'm letting my rather visceral hatred of Wesley Crusher influence my perception of this episode, but I don't think so. Just one brief moment of doubt from another conspirator is all I'm asking for; I don't think that's too much. It would have been extra nice if it was Sito who had the hesitation since she later appears (as a character we're meant to have a great deal of sympathy for) in "Lower Decks."
Now, let's talk about Boothby for a minute. I'm not quite sure what I think of this character. I like the idea of him as he was originally conceived - as a kind of figure Picard looked up to in his youth but who doesn't remember Picard all that well. Eventually, however, he becomes a kind of mentor figure to just about everyone who attends Starfleet Academy. I think I remember from one of his VOY appearances that its said that "he has the ear of every Captain in the fleet." Why? I don't think he's detrimental to this episode, but the transformation is already apparent. Instead of being someone who Picard happened to know years ago and looked up to, he's now someone who had a tremendous impact on Picard's life, has followed Picard's career with great interest and has his finger on the pulse of virtually everything that happens at the Academy.
Ultimately, "The First Duty" is a damn fine episode with a great moral conundrum at it's core and some wonderful world-building. It's just a shame that they couldn't help but put Wesley up on a pedestal (even if it they did it differently this time.)
There, I made it through an entire review of "The First Duty" without mentioning the Locarno/Paris controversy.... oh shit!
8/10
Wed, Aug 19, 2015, 10:17am (UTC -6)
Sito does get upset even before Wesley that Nick blames Josh for the accident. I actually think Wesley feels the most hesitation not because he's the most moral but because he LITERALLY has his parental figures breathing down his neck. It's harder to lie in front of Jean Luc Picard.
Sat, Sep 26, 2015, 3:11pm (UTC -6)
I don't get the idea that Wesley is being played out of character. He spent his time on the Enterprise acting beyond his years, mentored by the father figure Picard. Locarno also promotes him above his years, while offering a similar role model to look up to. That Wesley's moral compass shows him that his direction is wrong - even if it requires the riveting attention of Picard to kick him into acting on it - seems utterly grounded in what we have seen before. For Wesley to have covered up the truth would have corrupted the character beyond repair. 3.5 stars.
Thu, Mar 3, 2016, 6:31am (UTC -6)
To who? All series are owned by the same company. Do you mean to a specific writer? That's not how IP works. Whoever told you that is fuzzy on what "royalties" means.
Fri, Mar 18, 2016, 11:38am (UTC -6)
Imagine that the rehearsal went well and nobody died and they performed the starburst at the ceremony. It's still a forbidden manoeuvre, isn't it? Did they think that the Academy authorities would cheer wildly and tell them it didn't matter? Or would they be up in front of an Inquiry on charges of being so stupid?
Fri, Mar 18, 2016, 12:06pm (UTC -6)
Are rules always just? The Kolvoord Starburst was banned 100 years prior. If the maneuver could have been performed safely in the 24th century, it may have shown Starfleet that the rule was obsolete.
Sat, Mar 19, 2016, 4:00pm (UTC -6)
Good point. I didn't consider that. Now when I see the episode I won't spend most of it thinking: 'Hang on a minute...'
Thank you!
Mon, Apr 18, 2016, 10:24am (UTC -6)
To who? All series are owned by the same company. Do you mean to a specific writer? That's not how IP works. Whoever told you that is fuzzy on what "royalties" means.
<
Actually, you could have just used Google and found out that the original writer would have had to be paid for EVERY episode that "Nick" appeared in. Use Google before commenting.
Mon, Apr 18, 2016, 10:59am (UTC -6)
Memory Alpha lists numerous *possible* reasons for not making Paris and Locarno the same character including royalties, but no official reason was ever given by the creators.
Thu, Jul 14, 2016, 12:00am (UTC -6)
Russ was on bridge as extra in The Motion Picture. He wasn't Tuvok.
So why not McNeil as Locarno in Next Generation. He wasn't Marseille lol.
Thu, Jul 14, 2016, 12:12am (UTC -6)
Dorn was, in fact, Worf in Star Trek VI. Colonel Worf.
Thu, Nov 24, 2016, 12:33am (UTC -6)
To me, this is a huge fallacy in the story. What was the plan if Nova Squadron HAD successfully completed the Kolvoord Starburst?
Everyone acts as if they would suddenly all be given a free pass as long as the maneuver was successful. As Picard put it: "Locarno would graduate a living legend".
But wait a minute - They all knowingly engaged in a highly dangerous and illegal flight maneuver. They all knowingly lied and filed a fraudulent flight plan.
Why would the academy ever let them fly again after a stunt like that? Their flight privileges would be revoked permanently, and they would have severe reprimands placed on their permanent records, which would follow them around everywhere. Good luck getting a captain to trust one of them at the helm of a ship after that.
Basically, it would have ruined their flight careers, their team would be disbanded, and Locarno might not have even been allowed to graduate at all.
So was it really worth it?
Chrome stated: "If the maneuver could have been performed safely in the 24th century, it may have shown Starfleet that the rule was obsolete".
Okay - They might eliminate the rule in the future, but that has no bearing on the present, where Nova Squadron willingly disobeyed a standing regulation that banned the maneuver.
As others stated, I also wondered where Troi was during this entire episode. Even non-betazoids could see that they were hiding something. Troi would have known instantly that they were all lying, and a great scene would have been Troi coming to Wesley's room and having a heart to heart discussion with him.
Thu, Nov 24, 2016, 7:22am (UTC -6)
They might get a slap on the wrist, but public opinion would've been on their side IF they were successful. At least, that's what they were banking on. Picard's dialogue you mentioned implies that Starfleet would've been dumbfounded enough by them pulling it off that they'd let it slide.
Thu, Nov 24, 2016, 10:30am (UTC -6)
Yes, that has merit, especially when you go back and listen to all of Boothby's comments about Nova Squadron. Basically, they were considered super-celebrities on campus, so they were betting that the massive celebrating that would ensue would dwarf the one that Boothby talks about when "Nova Squadron won the Rigel cup", and this would put enormous pressure on the faculty to be lenient.
Whether that would actually happen or not is debatable, especially when you see what a hard-lined approach Admiral Brand took.
It was a gamble, and Locarno (as well as the others) may have been caught up in their own fame, and thought they could get away with almost anything. Wesley even alluded to this during his final speech to the inquiry: "We thought we could do anything".
Mon, Dec 5, 2016, 2:59am (UTC -6)
Mon, Dec 5, 2016, 4:58am (UTC -6)
Mon, Jan 16, 2017, 8:23pm (UTC -6)
Sun, Feb 5, 2017, 12:06pm (UTC -6)
Sure we do. I live in a house much of which was built in the around 1450. We have plenty of latch doors - the "handle" is a lever that lifts up a latch - the design of which goes back to the medieval period. Many of the buildings in my college at university were of roughly the same age and had big ring handles which will also have been familiar to people in the Middle Ages and probably back to Roman times and before.
Tue, Feb 7, 2017, 5:05pm (UTC -6)
That's literally the only way I can watch his Locarno scenes without my brain screeching to a halt, haha. It's not just the same actor-- it's the same CHARACTER, in basically every detail but name.
Fri, Feb 24, 2017, 7:20pm (UTC -6)
I think it's a joke for them to tell us that (in canon) that these two characters are different people who just happen to both be master pilots. Give me a break.
Locarno IS Paris, who made a mistake, got sent to the penal colony, and was then recruited by Janeway because of his incredible piloting skills.
I thought Locarno's plea for leniency for the others on his team was a noble thing to do...unfortuately, Wesley left Starfleet, Sito was sent on a rotten mission that she didn't return from by Picard, and we're never told what happened to the fourth member of the team (Jean Hajar).
Sun, Mar 19, 2017, 1:23am (UTC -6)
Fri, Mar 31, 2017, 12:31pm (UTC -6)
I do really like that they continued to bring this actor back once in awhile on different shows.
Sat, May 13, 2017, 6:01pm (UTC -6)
I understand them wanting to pursue a more episodic feel for Voyager and not to go down the DS9 road of having a grand soap opera. But the problem is that it was antithetical to Voyager's premise to make it episodic and pretty much ruined it from the getgo. This small decision to spit on series continuity turned out to be an omen of things to come.
Mon, Jun 5, 2017, 10:11pm (UTC -6)
Mon, Jul 31, 2017, 1:22pm (UTC -6)
I think I have discovered the best way this episode could have ended, while remaining true to the cliche of the courtroom drama:
Admiral Brand asks "Do any of you wish to add to your testimony?" Awkward silence, camera focused on Wesley's face. She's about to pronounce judgement, but is interrupted momentarily by Boothby who enters the courtroom and shuffles to a seat in the back. Wesley makes eye contact with him. Then he looks at his feet, and stands up and confesses.
This would have been much more noble, and would also have given Boothby's character the meaning for which he was originally intended (when Picard first mentioned him many episodes ago): he is supposed to be a force which kept Picard grounded.
Wed, Aug 2, 2017, 1:57pm (UTC -6)
On the flip side of that, you could also make the case that Wesley stood up and confessed DESPITE the fact that they were only getting the equivalent of a slap on the hand for the actions they had taken, because there was simply not enough evidence to prove what the judges already knew really happened anyway.
While Locarno kept beating the idea of 'protecting the team' into Wesley, he should have responded with:
"What about protecting the team's honor and telling the truth? What good is our team if we have no integrity and lie about what we've done and try to cover it up? How is a team like that even worth defending?"
Tue, Aug 22, 2017, 12:51am (UTC -6)
I've always liked my characters a bit darker and w/some edge, which is probably why ST: DS9 is my favorite. Darker characters. Less goody-goody actions. More human dilemmas and moral questions. That said, this is a good episode!
I loved Nick Locarno. He was interesting and definitely not irredeemable, IMO. think the royalty reason is the probably the real reason why he was not brought onto Voyager. RDM did a great job w/Nick. I really liked the character and was happy to see "him" on Voyager when it premiered. At the time, I thought "Tom Paris" was "Nick Locarno" since I didn't remember "Nick Locarno" was the name of the character on TNG. I just assumed it was the same character from this episode. I thought it was cool that they brought back the "character" and gave him a role on the new series, esp since he was such an interesting character. It wasn't until I saw this episode again that I realized they were two different people. LOL! I like to think of them as the same person though.
Tue, Aug 22, 2017, 9:17am (UTC -6)
Tue, Aug 22, 2017, 10:32am (UTC -6)
"At the end of the day, no one forced that guy to participate. It's a shame he died, but that's the risk they all took. I wanted Wesley to stick w/the lie and not confess."
The episode makes it pretty clear that Joshua would not have participated had he not been pressured into it by his team. They all took the risk, but him alone taking the blame for a risk they all took is pretty shameful.
Tue, Aug 22, 2017, 10:47am (UTC -6)
"PICARD: You knew what you had to do. I just made sure you listened to yourself. Goodbye, Cadet."
I think it's Picard looking out for his own.
If the truth would have ever come out, who recommended his entry into Star Fleet?
Tue, Aug 22, 2017, 12:59pm (UTC -6)
Picard was totally looking out for Wes, I just think the threat was excessive and that the choice should have come from within.
@ Chrome - "On the other hand, Wesley may not have confessed if Picard hadn't made that threat. He was pretty far deep into the lie at that point anyway."
That depends on how the writers wrote his conscience :P
It's a minor point, but I would have preferred that Picard guide him to what was right, not strongarm him. In the end his 2 choices were tell the truth or call Jean Luc Picard a liar to his face. I'd have preferred that his choices were tell the truth or lose Picard's respect is all.
Minor complaint.
Tue, Aug 22, 2017, 1:09pm (UTC -6)
Tue, Aug 22, 2017, 1:26pm (UTC -6)
"It's a minor point, but I would have preferred that Picard guide him to what was right, not strongarm him. In the end his 2 choices were tell the truth or call Jean Luc Picard a liar to his face. I'd have preferred that his choices were tell the truth or lose Picard's respect is all."
I understand this, it isn't a new idea here as several people have brought it up over the years. But I can't imagine a scenario where Picard wouldn't report Wesley to Starfleet. This episode drives home how principled Picard is because of his past at the academy. So, really it's a matter of Wesley getting a false choice or Picard revealing his intentions.
Tue, Sep 26, 2017, 3:56pm (UTC -6)
I guess Locarno and Tom Paris from VOY are cut from the same cloth - so not a stretch for McNeill to act them both. Almost immediately when Locarno showed up in the episode, it was pretty clear he wanted to make sure Wes hid something.
But mainly, this is an episode where Wesley is truly just an ordinary dude stuck in a situation where he has done wrong and needs to do the right thing. He'll upset Locarno but even worse, he'll upset Picard and himself. The Boothby character was a nice touch tipping off Picard on Locarno, I think (saying the squadron members would do anything for the team etc.).
It all plays out in a very believable way -- Dr. Crusher can't believe there could be anything fishy and so is standing behind Wes who is trying to push her away -- nice dynamic there to create some tension/intrigue.
A strong 3 stars for "The First Duty" -- a good story, good characters but I don't see this as an exceptional TNG episode worthy of 3.5 or 4 stars. I'd agree this is the best Wesley episode so far as he's portrayed most realistically (though not hard to make an improvement from earlier portrayals). Good episode for Picard too.
Wed, Nov 29, 2017, 6:55pm (UTC -6)
Not particularly crazy about this one. Took a while to get where going. The mystery and inquery regarding the accident pretty flat. I’m also someone not all that crazy about cadets—for that reason didn’t like Valiant or Red Squad and dreaded rumors of an Acadeny Trek series over the years. I’ve always liked Wes so his portions worked better than the other three cadets who didn’t do much for me. Locarno I couldn’t stand. He came off as your typical popular “jock” who has an entitled attitude and looks out for himself Known plenty of those guys in high school
The best scenes in the episode featured Picard and Boothby. Overall the episode checked off all the things you’d expect in a story like this which was far from original. It has been done many times before—a military cover up and duty. It was merely dressed up here with Star Trek accoutrements but that didn’t do much to elevate it in my opinion.
Submit a comment
◄ Season Index