Star Trek: Enterprise

"Desert Crossing"

**1/2

Air date: 5/8/2002
Teleplay by Andre Bormanis
Story by Rick Berman & Brannon Braga and Andre Bormanis
Directed by David Straiton

Review by Jamahl Epsicokhan

"Nice tapestry." — Archer; general uncomfortable-silence breaker

In brief: Some well-established further momentum on tack for the Prime Directive, but with too many disposable scenes.

A man named Zobral (Clancy Brown) invites Archer and Trip to his camp for what appears to be simple hospitality. While in orbit, the Enterprise is contacted by a government official who wants to know why the Enterprise sent a shuttle down to that region of the planet's surface, known lands of a terrorist organization. When false pretenses are revealed, Zobral says his people are forced to commit terrorist activities as their only avenue to wage a war against a nation with far superior military options. Hmmm, sound familiar?

The episode's subjects are obviously supposed to be abstractions of Israelis and Palestinians. Meanwhile, the message is that we're more likely to sympathize with people when we're more familiar with them. This is, admittedly, not a stunning revelation. If Trip and Archer had been invited as guests by the other side of the conflict on this world, no doubt we would've seen suffering on their end that would've presented arguments justifying their military action.

The rest of the show's message centers on another pre-Prime Directive issue, in what seems to be a major season theme that I'm intrigued by. Between "Dear Doctor," "Detained," and now "Desert Crossing," we're seeing exactly why the Prime Directive is going to become a necessity. I appreciated the direct reference to "Detained": Zobral sought out Archer specifically because he got an exaggerated account of how the Enterprise helped free the Suliban imprisoned there. It's very respectable use of a previous story thread to enhance this one.

Unfortunately, where "Desert Crossing" goes wrong is in taking a misguided detour from this storyline in favor of a plot where Archer and Trip find themselves stranded in the desert. The episode gives us interminable scenes of desert-survival-movie cliches. Filmed on location in the desert regions of the U.S. Southwest, the episode seemingly falls into the trap of trying to justify the expense of having shot there. There's simply too much unnecessary desert footage. Scenes where Archer and Trip walk through the desert — exhibiting the usual signs of exhaustion and dehydration, with Trip on the verge of collapse and Archer looking after him — stop the story dead in its tracks. This has all been done before, and "Desert Crossing" finds no new angle for the material. Even the scenes of Trip's suffering fail to be engaging because they come across as generic instead of specific to the character. "Shuttlepod One," another survival story, was far better than this because the characters were allowed to interact with each other and had the benefit of useful dialog.

Meanwhile, T'Pol and the Enterprise crew attempt to track down the captain, eventually coming in contact with Zobral to figure out what went wrong. I greatly appreciated that the writers let Zobral maintain his sincere personality rather than turning him into a single-minded villain. A lesser story might've used Zobral to set the plot in motion and then after that made him an unnecessary obstacle to our characters' progress. "Desert Crossing" plays fair by keeping his personality fairly consistent throughout. Clancy Brown delivers an effective performance with a faux accent, playing the character just broadly enough to give him the charisma he needs to lure us in before revealing his more serious side.

The early scenes are fairly pleasant. I laughed at a dinner moment where Archer and Trip reluctantly eat something Zobral calls "the essence of the male," to which Archer can only respond with "Nice tapestry" after a long silence. The sport-playing sequence — something that resembles sci-fi lacrosse — struck me as appropriate but at the same time redundant, especially considering that the subsequent issues of social conflict don't seem to get as much attention as they deserve.

What does get some good attention is Archer questioning himself in regard to interfering in the affairs of other worlds. Once again, he's faced with someone asking for his help. He is, in fact, faced with this latest request because he helped the Suliban a few weeks earlier.

What I especially like about this aspect of the story is how it reveals the cumulative effect that these requests and their consequences are having on Archer as Starfleet's first captain in the wilderness. With good reason, he doesn't make the choice here that he made in "Detained." And with each case, Archer is realizing more and more that decisions like these are too big for captains to be making on the spot and on their own; guidelines will become necessary. It's good to know that when the Prime Directive eventually is drafted, we'll be able to see how we got there, via a road that includes episodes like this one.

Ultimately, however, the problem with "Desert Crossing" is its level of unevenness. For as obvious as the story draws some of its subject matter from Israel/Palestine, it doesn't focus much on this world's internal conflicts or quandary-inducing political subtleties. That may be a good thing since it keeps the emphasis on the matter of the Enterprise's interference, but it seems to me that if you're going to make indirect references to the tensions in the Middle East, you owe it more than the lip service paid here. Then, of course, there's the whole matter of the desert-survival story, which seems like it belongs in an entirely different episode.

I'm also uncertain about the ending, where Archer appropriately cites the importance of non-interference ... but then says, "The irony is that I get the sense their cause is worth fighting for." Well, perhaps it is — from Zobral's people's point of view. But Archer's statement ignores the whole other side of the conflict, one Archer never got a chance to experience or even really hear from. The entire reason the Enterprise has no place taking sides here is because they are in fact a neutral party that doesn't even understand the conflict they've wandered into. Archer's final line of dialog is predictably sympathetic, but without more information about the workings of this world, it seems somewhat inappropriate to end the episode on such a note. I would've preferred something more neutral.

I dunno — in the real world is there such thing as a "neutral" party? The U.S. certainly isn't perceived as one when it comes to the Middle East situation, probably for good reason. It's perhaps worth noting that the spirit of the Prime Directive doesn't really work in a world you're a part of.

Next week: The crew finally gets to Risa. And it only took three tries.

Previous episode: Fallen Hero
Next episode: Two Days and Two Nights

◄ Season Index

9 comments on this review

Cloudane
Sun, Jun 5, 2011, 6:28pm (UTC -5)
Meh

My only comment really is that the terrorist guy sounds like he should be playing a Klingon. His voice wasn't made for anything else..
Captain Jim
Sat, Jul 21, 2012, 10:20pm (UTC -5)
I'd say Jammer's comments are about right. Not a bad episode, but it really did seem to drag.
Patrick
Wed, Sep 19, 2012, 12:41pm (UTC -5)
Meh

My only comment really is that the terrorist guy sounds like he should be playing a Klingon. His voice wasn't made for anything else..


Except for the voice of Mr. Krabs on Spongebob Squarepants.
Rosario
Fri, Nov 9, 2012, 2:33pm (UTC -5)
Of course the voice is awesome! That's Clancy Brown! The Kurgan from Highlander and Drill Sergeant Zim from Starship Troopers!

"The Desert Survival Scene[TM]"(s), could hardly be called that. They wouldn't have survived a day like that. Desert scenes should never be done in TV or movies since they are never done right. Trip who came across so optimistic in Shuttlecraft One was just revolting in this episode. Every thing he did just made me think, Knucklehead, Knucklehead, Dead Knucklehead.

I do like the continuity though. Shades of maybe, a story arc. As you say Jammer, the continued look at the prime directive's origins/reasons is, for me, one of the few things of genuine interest.

Also, Clancy Brown's wicked Kurgan-like smile when the shuttlecraft blew up the mortar was quite fun.

I didn't actually see the Isreal/Palestine comparison. Saw it more as when the british empire ended the caliphate and the desert tribes expected to be on equal footing with the ruling tribes but instead got left out in the desert. Then they got some guns! If it was Palestine then Zobral would have lots of neighbors that claimed solidarity with him but wouldn't let him take shelter so that they could use him as a grievance :P mmm cynical
Sintek
Sat, May 25, 2013, 5:46am (UTC -5)
Ok, who gave Clancy the Pee-Wee trick gum? That has got to violate a first contact rule.
Diamond Dave
Sat, Apr 2, 2016, 2:44pm (UTC -5)
Pretty desperate stuff. By far the best thing about this episode was the demonstration of how by acting in one place (in this case during 'Detained') there can be unintended consequences somewhere else - the very essence of why the Prime Directive was needed.

Unfortunately this was not what we concentrated on, instead getting vast swathes of desert trudging that didn't even give us any character development given Trip was too far gone to be coherent. This killed the momentum stone dead and the episode never recovered. 1.5 stars.
Xepth
Sat, May 28, 2016, 11:06am (UTC -5)
Seeing Trip in yet another bad spot makes me feel like he's the O'brien of Enterprise.

Other than that, it just seemed like a real drag to Archer and Trip, to drive home the necessity to formulate something like a Prime Directive.
dipads
Tue, Jun 7, 2016, 6:09am (UTC -5)
Clancy Brown (Zobral), the sadistic guard from Shawshank Redemption, was the only standout in this otherwise mediocre episode. Lawrence of Arabia it was not.
Yanks
Wed, Jul 20, 2016, 1:22pm (UTC -5)
I kept wait for Zobral (Clancy Brown) to say "There can only be ONE!!" :-)

A skipper for me. I understand there are some prime directive implications here but I'll part with Jammer here with regard to this passage:

"T'POL: What you told him was correct. Decisions to get involved in the conflicts of other worlds should be left to governments, and not starship captains.
ARCHER: I know. The irony is, I have the feeling his cause is worth fighting for. on this one. Archer's little speech at the end was"

T'Pol is of course right. Archer's response is more of a man-crush WRT Zobral that any in-depth side choosing here I think.

I think I would watch this episode more if T'Pol and Hoshi where playing beach volleyball :-)

I always think of Afghanistan and Russia when I watch this one.

Blah... 2 stars from me.

Submit a comment





Notify me about new comments on this page
Hide my e-mail on my post

◄ Season Index

▲Top of Page | Menu | Copyright © 1994-2016 Jamahl Epsicokhan. All rights reserved. Unauthorized duplication or distribution of any content is prohibited. This site is an independent publication and is not affiliated with or authorized by any entity or company referenced herein. See site policies.