Comment Stream

Search and bookmark options Close
Search for:
Search by:

Total Found: 11 (Showing 1-11)

Page 1 of 1
Set Bookmark
Panagiotis Karatasios
Wed, Sep 13, 2017, 3:36pm (UTC -5)
Re: ORV S1: Old Wounds

So if we don't like DS9. we are racists!! Wel i haven't thought thatbefore!!!!!
Set Bookmark
Panagiotis Karatasios
Wed, Sep 13, 2017, 3:57am (UTC -5)
Re: ORV S1: Old Wounds

Jammer

as omicronpetatheti said if you are starving then you are not much interested for the quality of the food. I'm simply very very tired with dark and gritty science fiction. which is the only kind we see the last 10-12 years.
Set Bookmark
Panagiotis Karatasios
Tue, Sep 12, 2017, 3:55pm (UTC -5)
Re: ORV S1: Old Wounds

I really enjoeyd it. Not because it was great ( it was not) but because, finally, i saw an optimistic future. I' m so tired eith dark and gritty visions of the future.
Set Bookmark
Panagiotis Karatasios
Sat, Jul 30, 2016, 3:52am (UTC -5)
Re: Star Trek Beyond

@Dom
I absolutely agree with you.For me the solution to the problem is simple: stop making star trek films. Star trek never worked on cinema, it was created as tv show (and ,eventually, a tv franchise ) and it was on tv that it allways excelled (i only liked three of the movies while i found the others just watchable or even worst). And now with Discovery placed on the original timeline the franchise will find itself with an even bigger problem: a movie franchise in one timeline and a tv franchise in the other. Schizofrenia!
Ofcourse i know that it will not happen because Paramount makes money with the movies and wants to continue making money. And the division of the fans not only will continue but it will become even bigger.Sad.
Set Bookmark
Panagiotis Karatasios
Sun, Jul 24, 2016, 4:18am (UTC -5)
Re: Star Trek Beyond

Don't worry "old complainers" like me!. The original timeline comes back officially in the new series Star Trek: Disocvery


io9.gizmodo.com/star-trek-discov ... 1784196830
Set Bookmark
Panagiotis Karatasios
Sat, Jul 23, 2016, 5:27pm (UTC -5)
Re: Star Trek Into Darkness

With all due respect jammer if you give this movie 3 stars i doubt that will agree in much of anything.
Set Bookmark
Panagiotis Karatasios
Mon, Jun 6, 2016, 6:04am (UTC -5)
Re: New Trek Series Coming in 2017

And the veteran trek writer Joe Menosky

trekmovie.com/2016/05/30/cbss-star-trek-all-access-adds-voyager-novelist-kirsten-beyer-to-writing-staff/
Set Bookmark
Panagiotis Karatasios
Mon, Jun 6, 2016, 6:01am (UTC -5)
Re: New Trek Series Coming in 2017

A star trek novelist was added to the writers of the show

trekmovie.com/2016/05/30/cbss-star-trek-all-access-adds-voyager-novelist-kirsten-beyer-to-writing-staff/
Set Bookmark
Panagiotis Karatasios
Thu, Apr 30, 2009, 4:00am (UTC -5)
Re: VOY S7: Unimatrix Zero, Part II

Voyager's episodes with the borg were a real disaster for the borg idea. InTNG the borg were mysterious, truly allien, truly different, the exact opposite of humanity but yet so similar to federation. After all was perfection an absolutely different goal from humanity's objective to better itself? it was the eans that were so different and it was the means that made borg so frightening. And then came voyager. The borg were transformed from an awesome villaint to something dangerous but also trivial loosing their radical difference. just another villaint race. In comparison with voyager's borg the dominion look much more threatening amd much more different. Thy were also trandformed from a race with truly collective consciousness to one with individual leadership. Their collectiveness was also destroyed with their transformation into mindless automata but collective consciousness amd mindless automata are two different things. Well what remained? almost nothing.
Set Bookmark
Panagiotis Karatasios
Tue, Apr 28, 2009, 3:35am (UTC -5)
Re: BSG S4: Daybreak, Part 2 (April Fools Version)

Personally i can't find anything interesting in Caprica. With Caprica science fiction is deteriorating in soap opera and i'm not interested in that.
Set Bookmark
Panagiotis Karatasios
Fri, Mar 27, 2009, 2:38am (UTC -5)
Re: BSG S4: Daybreak, Part 2 (April Fools Version)

Quote "As well as being all completely acceptable within the established continuity of the show, its not like there was a specific reference to a 'God' or 'Gods' or whatever, just like Baltar said. It goes whatever way you want it to, and if I was so inclined to want to completely rationalise it (which I'm not, I don't think theres any point, considering its a TV show and all) theres still the opportunity to mark it down to some sort of scify highly evolved entity."

that's all correct after all ther are many things in the universe that we can not explain or at least perceive for example who can perceive a naked singularity that means something with infinite mass and infinite ccurvature? but we must akgnowledge that the writers rather than leaveing the answer to the question of a higher power open they gave a more definite religious feeling to it and that is what annoyed many people And definitely it was not science fiction.The end whould be much better without such a hint to a religious direction
Page 1 of 1
▲Top of Page | Menu | Copyright © 1994-2017 Jamahl Epsicokhan. All rights reserved. Unauthorized duplication or distribution of any content is prohibited. This site is an independent publication and is not affiliated with or authorized by any entity or company referenced herein. See site policies.