Comment Stream

Search and bookmark options Close
Search for:
Search by:

Total Found: 34,964 (Showing 1-25)

Next ►Page 1 of 1,399
Set Bookmark
Sat, Oct 1, 2016, 4:38pm (UTC -5)
Re: TNG S4: Future Imperfect

The most GLARING plot hole (in my opinion) was Worf still being just a helmsman after 16 years.

Yes, someone else mentioned that many of the officers should have gone on to other things by now, but Worf's position was by far the most ridiculous, unbelievable part of this story.

Really? SIXTEEN years of additional Starfleet duty and Worf is still just a helmsman? And Riker doesn't even have one single reaction to it except to pat his chair when he sees him for the first time? That should made him very suspicious right away.

That was extremely lazy by the writers, as was the fact that they must have blew all their money on the futuristic Sick Bay set - so much so that they left the Enterprise bridge virtually unchanged with no advancements whatsoever.

I get that it's all supposed to be a fantasy created for him - but if Riker's mind gave him a futuristic Sick Bay, why not the rest of the ship including his quarters?

Was it really so hard to believe that Data could finally use the word "Can't" after sixteen years? (this was an idiotic idea from the start of the series - Data can use complex words in a poem about his cat, but is unable to use contractions??)

Also, the fact that the boy called the Romulan "Ambassador Tomalak" was extremely trivial, and shouldn't have been the event that smashed the house of cards. For all Riker knew, Tomalak had the boy call him that all along in case they needed to use him later. Again, just trivial.

I also liked how Riker saw Minuet perfectly a couple times in the video and had no reaction to it - but then the final time, he finally reacts to it..... And why the hell would it pick Minuet instead of Diana? Diana was actually real and IN HIS LIFE every single day. You would think she would have been much more prominent in his mind than a holodeck fantasy from years past....

You'd think they'd send an away team down at the end to take advantage of the advanced alien technology the boy used the whole time. But don't get me started on new technology suddenly being Voyager returning home with transphasic torpedoes and armor hull plating, yet it's no where to be seen in Star Trek Nemesis. Lazy ass writers.....

All in all it's still a fun episode to watch. However, when you watch these things over and over again, you can't help but notice all of the errors and inconsistencies.

Lastly, this must have been a fun episode for Geordi. Levar Burton often said in interviews that it was a pain in the ass trying to walk around with the visor on, which he could barely see through. At least he got a break for a couple scenes.

Set Bookmark
Sat, Oct 1, 2016, 3:15pm (UTC -5)
Re: VOY S7: Endgame

Just finished a rewatch of this series, and this finale is much more hollow than I remember it being. The whole thing screams of utterly sloppy writing. There is the borg civil war from Unimatrix Zero that is completely ignored. It was earlier established that Seven could NOT have a relationship because of one of her implants, yet now she has one with Chakotay with no issues (a relationship that just came out of nowhere and is not believable in the slightest.) Why would Admiral Janeway go to that particular point in time? Why not use the technology to simply bring Voyager back across the galaxy? Why is the exit point of the transwarp hub so close to Earth? Wouldn't it have been seen before? (They allude earlier that the exits are static: "That one leads to the Delta Quadrant.") If the Borg have trans-warp hubs, why haven't they ever sent an army to cripple Earth? With that kind of traveling power, one would think the Battle at Wolf 359 would have been a cakewalk for them.

I love Voyager but it could have been so much more. The whole story line with the Maquis is left unanswered - it's alluded to earlier in the series that the Maquis will face severe consequences when they get back! How does Seven integrate into society? What about the Doctor? Echeb?

My hope was that with the new Star Trek Discovery, we would at least get to see what happened to some of these characters via guest appearances, but turns out the series will be set before TOS. I don't have much hope for the Trek franchise anymore.
Set Bookmark
Sat, Oct 1, 2016, 12:34pm (UTC -5)
Re: DS9 S4: The Sword of Kahless

I've seen this episode many times and love the richness of Colicos acting. Dorn keeps up with him beautifully which is no small feat. Klingon natures would naturally become very inflamed on acquiring the Sword. Kor and Worf are very heavy hitters even for Klingons. Dax was equal to the task of moderator and deserves her place as a heroine.

Kor at one point stares at Worf for 3 hours (and Worf does not exaggerate!) Kor as old as he was and after walking and fighting all day could still concentrate and stare at Worf for 3 hours. (Try concentrating for 5 minutes after a long work day.) Kor has incredible Will. Remember at the end of TOS ' Errand of Mercy' Kor took delight in a possible challenge of Wills with Kirk and the Federation. Kor values strong will even for a Klingon.

Lastly Kor and Worf ended as understanding friends. I believe that Kor learned to respect Worf for his single mindedness. These things are the most important for Kor. All in all Kor admires strength, courage and will. Worf has all of these.
Set Bookmark
Sat, Oct 1, 2016, 11:21am (UTC -5)
Re: TOS S3: The Mark of Gideon

The Mark of Gideon was good because of the issue of overpopulation, and Odona is/was so very attractive. I wouldn't have minded and empty ship with her.
Set Bookmark
Peter G.
Sat, Oct 1, 2016, 8:45am (UTC -5)
Re: DS9 S6: Far Beyond the Stars

@ RJ, "It would have been generations since racism would have been a problem on earth so why, why why why why would be mean so much to Cisco?"

It's been 'generations' since WWII. Do you think it 'makes no sense' that the Jews are still concerned about the Holocaust? Do you think in a hundred years they'll be 'over it'? Not a chance. It's been *centuries* since the Spanish Inquisition and even more since the crusades. Do you not notice that people are still railing about these? But it "makes no sense", according to you. There are no crusades now, and no inquisition.

But we can bypass modern comparisons and look at Sisko himself. It was established already in S3 that Sisko has an interest in history; specifically, the history of oppressed peoples. He knew all about the Bell Riots, he had an apparent interest in the Bajoran history of spaceflight and how the species that was more advanced than the Cardassians in some ways was the one to be subjugated, and so now we're hearing from him about black history. Should this come as a surprise, since the casting of the show is distinctly *about* a member of a previously oppressed race helping a recently injured race to heal?

"Far Beyond the Stars" is about social and political pressure to keep someone's identity down. Whether that means being black, where one has to lie low and pretend not to be a human being, or that means being the emissary, where Starfleet and other forces want Sisko to dismiss his identity - in both cases it's about being willing to stand alone, if need be, and to refuse to deny who you are. There is nothing timely about that message; it will always be true.
Set Bookmark
Sat, Oct 1, 2016, 3:12am (UTC -5)
Re: DS9 S5: Blaze of Glory

We don't have replicators so hard to know. However, enjoyment of food has a lot to do with the brain. If you THINK this tomato from your garden will taste better than the one from your friends garden; you will likely taste it and feel that way. Replicated wine or chicken may be 100% identical; however, the knowledge that it is 'not real", can affect perception when tasting it
Set Bookmark
Sat, Oct 1, 2016, 1:51am (UTC -5)
Re: DS9 S6: Far Beyond the Stars

Wow, wrote my above comment on a WP and copied and past, it changed Ben Sisko to Ben Cisco on me, I guess it wanted me to think that the good captain was a company.
Set Bookmark
Sat, Oct 1, 2016, 1:49am (UTC -5)
Re: DS9 S6: Far Beyond the Stars

I wasn't a big fan of this episode for one big reason: in the setting IT MAKES NO SENSE. Why would racism matter to Ben Cisco? Just like in the seventh season's Badda-Bang episode, this episode makes it look like Cisco has race issues to deal with, when in reality, it would have never existed for him ever. It would have been generations since racism would have been a problem on earth so why, why why why why would be mean so much to Cisco? Do people get that upset about something that has never effected them and hasn't impacted their life in any way? Earth in Star Trek is an Eden, Cisco would have never had to deal with human on human racism. It should be so far removed from his life and thinking, being only the stuff of ancient history, that it should not have a single emotional impact on him.
As for being social commentary about race, the whole episode is forced and is twenty five years too late.
Set Bookmark
Sat, Oct 1, 2016, 12:55am (UTC -5)
Re: Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country

I thought the movie did show that Spock's forced mind meld on Valeris was a huge violation of her person. Look again at the crew's faces as the camera pans on them-most of them are horrified, Uhura looks almost like she's witnessing a rape. Spock and Valeris are both nearly in tears afterwards, it's clear he didn't want to have to do it and she's been horribly violated. No one says anything because he did what he had to, and none of them were Vulcan, so even though they could sort of sense how horrible what he did was, they probably didn't truly know the depth of it. What could they say, really? "Captain, I wish you hadn't had to mindrape that girl in order to save the galaxy"? What would that accomplish? I thought the more subtle reaction shots of the crew, as well as Spock and Valeris' reactions, we're enough to drive the point home.
Set Bookmark
Sat, Oct 1, 2016, 12:51am (UTC -5)
Re: DS9 S5: Ferengi Love Songs

always a good laugh to go back and see Jammer ripping on Ferengi episodes.

Yeah, he hates them. We get it.....
Set Bookmark
Fri, Sep 30, 2016, 11:49pm (UTC -5)
Re: Star Trek III: The Search For Spock

I wondered, if it was so important to bring Spock's body back to Vulcan, why didn't the crew know so? Surely it would have been stated as part of his operating contract, or Saavik would have said something about Vulcans' bodies needing to be returned home for final rest. The way the film presented it, it was expected that Spock's body would be returned to his family and Sarek wasn't happy about their failure to do so.

Spock's death in the last film seemed unnecessary. There were so many people in radiation suits down there who could have gone in, or Spock could have taken a second to suit up. It seemed more rash impulsiveness than true necessity that caused his death. We were supposed to think time was so essential, only to watch Spock struggle and fumble as he fixed whatever it was he was fixing, costing precious seconds that could have been used in better preparation. Him slowly dying and Kirk watching through the glass was a truly heart wrenching moment, but Spock's decision to sacrifice himself like that didn't come off as "the only solution" so much as a knowingly suicidal impulse, a "I will go down fighting for those who matter", akin to a desperate act a cornered Kirk would pull (and probably succeed at, as Kirk seems to have some higher entity making sure his luck never truly runs out). He did it, knowing he would die, but I'm not sure if the film did a good job of showing what he did was truly necessary, and I'm uncertain if that's deliberate or not. Was Spock's death really the only way to save everyone, or was Spock blinded by his own desire to save his friends, and acting irrationally? Agape-the love of others over self, to the point of dying for them- is a powerful emotion to portray, but can be mis-written and come off as needless death or foolhardiness. His death felt more necessitated by design than truly integrated into the story. The film ends with hope, Spock's body landing on Genesis, the planet of rebirth, and already his sacrifice feels a bit cheapened, from the knowledge that he will most likely be brought back, his death a convenience of the story to make a point, rather than fully the character-defining moment it needed to be. Knowledge that Spock's death was forced into the story due to contract demands by Nimoy, rather than it arising naturally as a result of events, just confirms this feeling that his death was much too "convenient". It doesn't come off as a deliberate, well thought out development on the part of the authors, woven into the story as part of the main theme. Another character, introduced as an old friend and developed through the film, being put through the same end would still have served to fill the same thematic goal, and would perhaps have even done a better job at fulfilling this part, having been given the proper character arc. Spock's decision in the end is not part of a series-wide or even film-wide arc so much, although it could have been written as such. It comes off as just another decision, a bit shocking and out of the blue, as it does not march up with any thematic overture of the film. The story of Project Genesis is not self-sacrifice, the subplot with Kirk's son, not self-sacrifice, the fight against Khan, not self-sacrifice. This ending was not properly tied into the themes, and as such does not come off feeling like the end the story was meant to have.

Sorry for the departure into WOK discussion and the short novel, I found I have more feelings and confusion about that movie than I realized when I mentioned it. Back on topic.

We spend much time on Genesis with David, Saavik, and the naked child who would be Spock, but unfortunately very little happens there. We don't learn much about either Saavik or David, and they are clearly not that important other than as caretakers of the Spock shell. The writer's only reasons for placing Saavik there seems to be so that she can "help" him with Pon Farr. (On another tangent, why is it that he undergoes Pon Farr as a teenager this time around, when last time he didn't until much, much later? Is this supposed to be part of the Genesis effect, early onset Vulcan puberty? Or was he reborn different? Is that the normal age that they start rutting, and if so are all the men of Vulcan either married or murderers? What effect does being married/a murderer from a young age have on their society? Or do they have some sort of concubines to get around that problem... Vulcan culture is even worse for women than was previously depicted, if so.)

The threads with Kirk's son were never fully explored. He existed, and he died, but we weren't given a chance to grow attached or to care about him as a character. We lamented his death because of his relation to Kirk, rather than because we cared about him as a character in his own right. His death served to deal a blow to Kirk, nothing more. Saavik could easily have died in his place and pretty much nothing would have changed, except Kirk would have a little less motivation to fight the Klingons, but really he already had more than enough. It was almost like the writers were tying up loose ends: having no idea what to do with the character, they simply killed him off. His appearance in this story was completely unnecessary, and his absence wouldn't have made a difference. The writers probably brought him in only to kill him as a "death is inescapable, in order to revive one loved one you must sacrifice another" kind of thing, but they really didn't do a good job of that either. We barely knew the guy. Kirk seemed to barely know him. We felt for Kirk when he died, but to us the only loss was the hope that the character would develop into an important and likeable one, which given how he was used thus far, this hope was already pretty low. The loss of the Enterprise better served that purpose-we know the Enterprise. She is not a character, really, but still important, still beloved, to the audience as well as to Kirk. We know that Kirk loves the Enterprise, he loves it like the wife he could never have, and has said so many times. It is downplayed in the movies, where he has already been forced to give her up before, but we still know this. Her loss would be a devastating blow, sufficient to show one cannot regain what is lost without also losing something else. The beloved, iconic ship, blown to bits and gone, sacrificed to regain something Kirk realizes he values more. Instead, the destruction of the Enterprise comes off almost as a revenge for the death of Kirk's son. The son both he and we never knew, the lost opportunity for Kirk and the audience to learn more about himself. The Enterprise is an afterthought, overshadowed by the fact that we know that both we and Kirk should feel worse about the loss of his son, that he lost all chance to reconnect with this youth and try his hand at being the father he never could be, at growing as a person in ways he probably didn't think he could. In the wake of this lost character potential, the destruction of the Enterprise is just added melancholy rather than the deep, impacting moment it was meant to be. A huge fumble by the writers. We are left mourning the loss of potential rather than the actual death of the character, and the Enterprise blows up in the background.

The confrontation with the Klingon adversary wasn't altogether satisfying, but he was a sufficient villain, if a little too quickly cast into Mt. Doom after causing Kirk to lose both his son and the Enterprise. I liked him better here than in the My Favorite Matian movie where he was screaming about ice cream. A shallow villain, well, at least at the end. His willingness to sacrifice his loved one for the secrets of Genesis implied something more at the beginning, but he had to be offed in a dramatic struggle before too long because ultimately, this movie is about Spock, not Kirk's battles, and at the end of the day, the guy who ruined everything really can just be another grunt from the opposite side rather than an important entity of pure evil.
Set Bookmark
Peter G.
Fri, Sep 30, 2016, 11:09pm (UTC -5)
Re: DS9 S5: Things Past

In theory it sounds cool for Kira to have been along for the ride. In practice, however, it would have made the story untenable. Not only would Odo's explanations of the realities of the station be partially superfluous (since Kira knew that already) but more importantly, she would have immediately noticed the inconsistency in timeline between Thrax and Odo. The structure of the episode rides on the fact that Odo is misleading the others about what really happened because he doesn't want to own up to what he did. Despite being in his mind, if any of them just happened to know better the game would be up and Odo wouldn't have the chance to basically force himself to admit what he did.

Additionally, and this isn't so minor, we're already had plenty of Kira in scenes showing disgust for Dukat, and having that happen again here would have been both overkill and a sidetrack. And yet she would have had made just this kind of disparaging comment since part of the plot involved one of them having to endure Dukat's BS.
Set Bookmark
Fri, Sep 30, 2016, 10:00pm (UTC -5)
Re: VOY S1: State of Flux

Heya heya Everyone!

Upon first viewing in the 90's, I had been rooting for Seska after her impassioned plea toward the end. That she turned out to be a Cardassian spy, I felt it was a bit contrived. It was interesting, no doubt, but it just didn't feel right to me.

Now, upon viewing again after these many years, I had to wonder about something. Voyager knows more baddies are going to show up, but after getting their console/technology back, they just sit there. Were they going to scold the Kazon? (They wouldn't care, and would try to get the technology any way they could, because it was their space, after all). Were they going to attempt to question them? (Not likely they'd get any answers, because of my above note). So why did they just sit there? I'd figure they'd get the replicator back, then get the heck out of there at high warp. There was no reason to stay, except to give Seska a place to beam to. Period. Seemed silly to me they hung around until the last moment...

Overall, I really liked the episode, I just can't get past the fact they stayed right there...

Enjoy the day Everyone! RT
Set Bookmark
Fri, Sep 30, 2016, 9:35pm (UTC -5)
Re: Star Trek V: The Final Frontier

As someone pointed out the other night while we watched this film, of the big three Kelley and Nimoy have already passed on, Shatner remaining. Looks like Kirk really will die alone, in a sense. It kind of puts his somewhat melodramatic campfire confession into a darker context, considering the reality that followed.

I don't think this movie is as bad as Trekkers say it is. It probably holds closer to canon and previous continuity than ST:IV, and while the humor's more uncomfortable this time around, there are some genuine moments. The franchise would suffer from the excision of these moments.
Set Bookmark
Joey Lock
Fri, Sep 30, 2016, 8:49pm (UTC -5)
Re: TNG S5: The Masterpiece Society

I've always liked this episode because of the idea of a closed society of people who believe they're superior end up needing to be saved by "inferior" people. It's a great analogy that just because you enjoy poetry, have a grand education or are generally smart doesn't mean you're superior.

Also the whole Troi situation in this episode was a little irritating, they made Troi act like a blushing school girl whose fallen head over hills within the first minute of meeting this guy then everytime he's mentioned she smiles like when shes speaking to Picard about him, it's like shes thinking with her heart (Or her ovaries) instead of her brain when judging from past episodes shes usually more analytical than this.
Set Bookmark
Fri, Sep 30, 2016, 8:39pm (UTC -5)
Re: DS9 S5: Things Past

I'm not sure why I remember it this way, and I could be wrong, but I believe Visitor had already had her baby by the time "The Darkness and the Light" was filmed, but her pregnancy was part of the plot, so they carried it through.
Set Bookmark
Fri, Sep 30, 2016, 8:19pm (UTC -5)
Re: Star Trek: The Motion Picture

@ohx over two years later, long after you've long and gone, I came, I saw, and I laughed much too much at your assessment of things. "Spock flying into a giant butthole" indeed. The resemblance was not lost on me in my first viewing of this movie, and your hysterical description of events has only served to make sure I will always see it as such each subsequent viewing, probably to the confusion and annoyance of fellow watchers. I thank you for this, wherever you are now.

This movie seemed in love with its own special effects, and I found myself waiting for it to stop showing me what I'm sure were awe-inspiring and moving visuals. The focus on Ilia and Decker seemed pointless, I found that I couldn't bring myself to care about two new characters that didn't integrate with the old cast and took screen time away from them.

Killing off Sonak after only giving him one line was extremely disappointing to me, especially in a chillingly horrific transporter accident. I was looking forward to seeing the portrayal of a normal Vulcan Starfleet officer (Spock clearly had issues and wasn't really a good representation) and to seeing the rest of the crew's reaction to Kirk's preference for Vulcans in the top science spot and an exploration of what that said about Kirk and his longing to see Spock again, as well as Spock's own reaction to being obviously missed and replaced, but sadly that was never to be.

Kirk seemed oddly untroubled by Spock coming back out of the blue and resuming his post while ignoring his friends and clearly having his own agenda. McCoy comments on this but Kirk is just glad to have another familiar face around and doesn't mind that Spock could easily be replaced by a robot and no one would know the difference, and this whole arc is quickly guillotined with a round trip through a giant space sphincter and some brief hand-holding apparently reconciling Spock to his friends and convincing them he won't betray them.

V'ger was immediately obviously Voyager. There wasn't any surprise, from the first time I heard the name I knew this was a movie-length rehash of "The Changling" except this time we were supposed to be glad that the murdering space junk moved on to a higher plane of existence instead of blowing up. And Decker loving it even though it killed his girl and stole her form... Hmm.

All in all, not necessarily a bad movie, but I feel like I would have enjoyed it more had it not been Trek, or if I hadn't watched TOS and this was my first outing with the franchise.
Set Bookmark
William B
Fri, Sep 30, 2016, 5:35pm (UTC -5)
Re: DS9 S5: Things Past

There are certainly advantages to the way the episode played out, but I do think that having Odo have to deal with Kira seeing the truth (rather than her finding out about it afterward) probably would have made a kickass episode. However, I suspect that the primary reason Kira couldn't be included is pragmatic -- I think that Kira may have been excluded so as to lighten Nana Visitor's load during her pregnancy. One could say that the amount of material in The Darkness and the Light coming up suggests that they weren't really trying to do that, but I think that episode is an exception -- like they decided that if they were going to have Kira in much of an episode late in NV's pregnancy, they would make it count (and also make it a story which has to happen while Kira is pregnant).
Set Bookmark
Fri, Sep 30, 2016, 5:18pm (UTC -5)
Re: DS9 S5: Things Past

I'm interested in the decision the writers took not to have Kira as part of the regression group. In a way it would have made Odo even more uncomfortable and vulnerable. Maybe it was so that the last scene could play out between the two of them as a reversal to Necessary Evil in the same muted manner.
Set Bookmark
Fri, Sep 30, 2016, 2:43pm (UTC -5)
Re: ANDR S2: The Things We Cannot Change

Sorbo personally championed Wolfe's firing, only to reverse that stance when Andromeda (and any hope for Sorbo getting an A-list career) ended.
Set Bookmark
Peter G.
Fri, Sep 30, 2016, 11:55am (UTC -5)
Re: VOY S5: Course: Oblivion

@ John,

"Harry Kim as s sex addict"
-Reduces a passionate affair to: "sex addict". Check.

"Marriage is nothing more than the economic merger of two people."
-Defines other people's marriages for them, insisting there is no inherent value in them other than monetary. Check.

"how the fuck is a Borg drone more enlightened and less clueless than a mainstream 24th century person like Torres about the existence of open relationships and polyamory?"
-Takes a personal opinion about polyamory in the present and implies that someone in the future must hold his current opinion in order to be enlightened. Check.

Conclusion: Apparently in order to count as "futuristic" people of the future are expected to hold the personal opinion of one person in the present, and also to reject any belief that anyone has had in the past. "Progress" apparently means never sticking by any conviction from the past, and yet paradoxically means sticking by convictions of people right now who are 'already enlightened.'

Set Bookmark
Flamingo Bob
Fri, Sep 30, 2016, 10:28am (UTC -5)
Re: TNG S5: Silicon Avatar

Star Fleet's mission is to seek out new life and establish contact, not exterminate every potentially dangerous lifeform so colonization can go forward. The Klingons killed a lot of humans at first, but a way was found to cohabitate and the Federation was stronger for it.

As for the "prior communication" argument, we have no idea what Lore told the CE about humanity or what kind of impression it got regarding us with him as our sole representative. Marr's actions precluded any chance of clearing that up and, just by the way, made sure humans who encounter another CE lifeform (unlikely that there's only one) in future won't be able to communicate with it to perhaps save their lives. She will be responsible for any future deaths.
Set Bookmark
Fri, Sep 30, 2016, 3:11am (UTC -5)
Re: TOS S3: The Empath

I'm most curious about what the doomed species that was deemed not worthy of surviving (having lost out to Gem's species) was like.
Set Bookmark
Fri, Sep 30, 2016, 1:24am (UTC -5)
Re: TNG S5: Ethics

I agree this is a great one. Makes really good use of the characters—the best we've seen from Crusher and Troi, and maybe Riker, all season. (There's been *a lot* of Troi lately, but not until her few scenes here did I feel like she really clicked. There's been very little Crusher, so it's refreshing to give her something this good.)

I also liked Half a Life more than the consensus—probably the last episode that had me saying "wow, this is good" (sorry, Darmok)—so I guess I've got a soft spot for ethical dilemmas involving suicide in alien cultures.
Set Bookmark
Thu, Sep 29, 2016, 10:53pm (UTC -5)
Re: TOS S1: Charlie X

Pretty cool episode, I agree with the rest of the crew :P this is a bit creepy. The guest actor was a good one this time around.

I think the ending is not a cop-out but thematically consistent with the story. Charlie was basically a (superpowered) teen playing around while his parents weren't looking. And I can't think of many other choices of an ending, either self-destruction or some way to stop him (his parents). He was beyond reasoning or redemption since he banished Rand.

The basic idea of the episode reminds me of the classic short story "It's a good life". Charlie would have ended up like the kid from that story if he wasn't stopped. And yeah, Charlie was a sympathetic character, unlike some other ones I've seen so far (the thing of "The Man Trap"). Overall, I am satisfied.

And btw, I think I am watching the episodes in production order, because this was my eight episode of TOS instead of the second.
Next ►Page 1 of 1,399
▲Top of Page | Menu | Copyright © 1994-2016 Jamahl Epsicokhan. All rights reserved. Unauthorized duplication or distribution of any content is prohibited. This site is an independent publication and is not affiliated with or authorized by any entity or company referenced herein. See site policies.